evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Miscellaneous > Welding & Fabrication
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 8, 2009, 09:07 PM   #31
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis Area
Posts: 201

Drives: 03 Evo 8

Thanks for the heads up Mike...I appreciate your input. I also have a few questions about an 8 injector intake manifold. I will shoot you a pm.
__________________
AMS Tuned/2.0L/GT950R

http://www.amsperformance.com/e_null.php
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2009, 01:44 PM   #32
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SO. CO.
Posts: 236

Drives: K20 EJ1 68mm turbo, 03 EVO8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports View Post
You need to run the car at the track with and without the filter.. Thats how youll see the gains.. as for losing only 5hp.. whoever said that has no clue about what they are talking about.. they are guessing and are wrong..

Mike
I did a pull with my hood closed on the dyno on a k series car I had, with a filter on. Then did a pull with it open without a filter...want to guess the outcome!

Your right mike no clue what im talking about.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2009, 02:05 PM   #33
Plat Vendor
Personal Sales Rating: (128)
 
Mike@AwdMotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4,960

Drives: 2005 Evo RS.. 1st Street Evo in the 8's!!

Send a message via AIM to Mike@AwdMotorsports Send a message via MSN to Mike@AwdMotorsports
Quote:
Originally Posted by less10 View Post
I did a pull with my hood closed on the dyno on a k series car I had, with a filter on. Then did a pull with it open without a filter...want to guess the outcome!

Your right mike no clue what im talking about.
Do a pull down the track with the hood open.. then tell me the results..

Your right, i dont know what i am talking about..
__________________
Tel. 954-753-6006
AIM= mikeatawd
www.AwdMotorsports.com
  • 2003 Black Evo GSR - 8.75@163mph (US Quickest 4g63 Evo )
  • World's Quickest Evo 8 Street Car - 8.98@156mph
  • World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Turbo Evo - 10.21@133mph ( Most-Wanted )
  • World's Quickest Mivec Evo 9.05@157mph( Most-Wanted )
  • Florida's Quickest Evo IX Street Car - 9.75@143mph ( Shaun's )

Modifying the 4g63 for only 2 years.. Yes Only 2 years.. Hard to believe with the records above..
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2009, 02:10 PM   #34
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SO. CO.
Posts: 236

Drives: K20 EJ1 68mm turbo, 03 EVO8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports View Post
Do a pull down the track with the hood open.. then tell me the results..

Your right, i dont know what i am talking about..
Sure the mph will change 5-7mph, but its not a drag car. Its going to be on the street with spirited driving. And yes on the dyno it will only change minimally. So its cool to have the filter off and damage a wheel because its going to go 5mph faster on the street wow sounds like a winner winner chicken dinner to me.

Dont you have some selling to be doing, or just some whining?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 03:04 PM   #35
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SO. CO.
Posts: 236

Drives: K20 EJ1 68mm turbo, 03 EVO8

Here is some updates. Time for a tune soon and I think were gonna get to start it up and do a little heat treatment lol















Down pipe clearance, just gotta turn your head!!




Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 03:41 PM   #36
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (23)
 
raiceboi697's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,194

Drives: like a old lady

Send a message via AIM to raiceboi697 Send a message via Yahoo to raiceboi697
Quote:
Originally Posted by less10 View Post
Sure the mph will change 5-7mph, but its not a drag car. Its going to be on the street with spirited driving. And yes on the dyno it will only change minimally. So its cool to have the filter off and damage a wheel because its going to go 5mph faster on the street wow sounds like a winner winner chicken dinner to me.

Dont you have some selling to be doing, or just some whining?
as someone who drives a FF turbo kit everyday on the street i think i can say that this kind of set up with no filter is completely safe if you want it to be. if you tailgate a truck thats throwing rocks from its rear wheels then its your stupidity, just like if you want to drive in a downpour. if you ask any good tuner once the car is tuned on the dyno they will take the car on the street and make some fine tuning because the dyno enviroment dosent change like the outside world does. ive had my turbo for over 3 months now with a trip to ohio for the shootout and PA to sell my old cage and my turbo is just fine. or talk to the guys at STM, they drove the ricer for over a year with the first FF turbo kit without a issue. as to the comment about"spirited" driving, if you are driving like that on the street with anything modded this much your asking for trouble IMO. also to the OP those are some real drastic bends right off the flange for that manifold which will give you some high EGTs

but what does mike@ AWD motorsports or emery@STM know, one has the first street evo 8 in the 8s and the other has the fastest stock block evo record for the last year...
__________________
Just another stock block STM tuned evo
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 07:13 PM   #37
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
 
dsm25psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 744

Drives: 2005 evo 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by less10 View Post
Edit:: nevermind not getting into a debate with you. Thanks for all your concern.
thats what he said about ETS FF kit too lol, but nice looking kit, looks great
__________________

(700hp)6.6@111mph on Stock SSL car, With a sunroof lol
762hp and 608tq on the stock ecu!
771hp & 606tq - New
800s are next

Sponsored by:
ETS

JM Fab
Force-Fed Performance
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 09:29 PM   #38
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SO. CO.
Posts: 236

Drives: K20 EJ1 68mm turbo, 03 EVO8

Well since you want to stand behind your 90* bend being a sharp bend, then how about all these manifolds? Are all these companies horrible builders as well?

I know i cant get alot of pics, but there are things that would impede flow way more than a 90* bend off the head flange. One thing is a huge collector angle, and what about equal length? I see a few manifolds that are not equal length and seam to be half the length of the runners that are on the manifolds I have helped eric build.








Last edited by less10; Sep 23, 2009 at 09:50 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 05:34 AM   #39
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (23)
 
raiceboi697's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,194

Drives: like a old lady

Send a message via AIM to raiceboi697 Send a message via Yahoo to raiceboi697
i do enjoy seeing my car brought into this, and i can say the pic dont do the gap justice on mine as i can fit my hand all the way down to the flange and the bend is no where near as drastic as a from the top picture makes it out to be. now if that is the case then i gladly retract that bit of my statement. as for the full race manifold, a twin scroll set up will draw the exhaust pulses away in a different fashion then a single scroll, but on there one runner i do think that it is to drastic of a up bend, i also dont see the need or huge gains of twin scroll, thou that is not the conversation we are having at the moment but i would be more then willing to share my opinion on that in private. as for the ETS & peakboost top mount kits, those bends both use that style to let the turbo breath more efficiently at the top end and those bends go down which will actually help the exhaust gasses power the turbo. as for senior bushurs kit, there is no drastic bend there. you can probably fit to small Asian children in the space between the head and the runner. the welds do look awesome thou!
__________________
Just another stock block STM tuned evo

Last edited by raiceboi697; Sep 24, 2009 at 05:37 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 12:56 PM   #40
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
 
dsm25psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 744

Drives: 2005 evo 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by raiceboi697 View Post
i do enjoy seeing my car brought into this, and i can say the pic dont do the gap justice on mine as i can fit my hand all the way down to the flange and the bend is no where near as drastic as a from the top picture makes it out to be. now if that is the case then i gladly retract that bit of my statement. as for the full race manifold, a twin scroll set up will draw the exhaust pulses away in a different fashion then a single scroll, but on there one runner i do think that it is to drastic of a up bend, i also dont see the need or huge gains of twin scroll, thou that is not the conversation we are having at the moment but i would be more then willing to share my opinion on that in private. as for the ETS & peakboost top mount kits, those bends both use that style to let the turbo breath more efficiently at the top end and those bends go down which will actually help the exhaust gasses power the turbo. as for senior bushurs kit, there is no drastic bend there. you can probably fit to small Asian children in the space between the head and the runner. the welds do look awesome thou!

lol u are funny, look at STM pic and ETS, the 2 middle runners coming off the flange on both kits look the same "same bends" your STM pics got 3 90* bend to where ETS only got 2 and you still talk ****.

__________________

(700hp)6.6@111mph on Stock SSL car, With a sunroof lol
762hp and 608tq on the stock ecu!
771hp & 606tq - New
800s are next

Sponsored by:
ETS

JM Fab
Force-Fed Performance
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 12:59 PM   #41
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
 
dsm25psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 744

Drives: 2005 evo 8

less10 nice kit again, he just doesn't want to realize that his stm kit uses the same bends coming off the flange ass you do.
__________________

(700hp)6.6@111mph on Stock SSL car, With a sunroof lol
762hp and 608tq on the stock ecu!
771hp & 606tq - New
800s are next

Sponsored by:
ETS

JM Fab
Force-Fed Performance
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:37 PM   #42
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SO. CO.
Posts: 236

Drives: K20 EJ1 68mm turbo, 03 EVO8

Yup its all 90*'s my friends no short radius ones, no cheater cuts...all natural!!!

Oh and I bet my runners are equal length and longer!!!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2009, 11:21 PM   #43
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
whitepwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sucktown, MO
Posts: 126

Drives: 04 WW SSL Evo/BlkonBlk single 2jz Lexus SC400

I think some of you guys are getting carried away about horsepower numbers and track times and forgetting why they made it to fit a filter.. safety is the sole purpose behind adding a filter to the turbo. I don't make a $100,000 a year so if I just spent $1,500+ on a turbo I'd rather not see it grenade because a June Bug wasn't watching where it was going. The peace of mind that a small rock, water, or whatever else won't get into your turbo or motor is well worth the loss in performance IMO.

But then you could argue, "why put a FF kit on your car if you're going to run a filter?" Well I'm sure they won't be running a filter when they're racing it down the track or when they are headed out to race some local loud mouth over the weekend. But on the ride to work or to school who really cares if the car makes 650whp or 450whp.. lol

And I kind of agree with Mike. You aren't going to notice the difference on the dyno. You are going to notice the difference on the track. I would actually like to see someone who's a pretty consistent driver on the track run a FF kit with a filter and without a filter and see what his difference in times are, I'm just throwing a guess out there but I bet it'd be pretty substantial. That's just my .02 cents though.
__________________
2004 WW Evo8 SSL - OUT-OF-ORDER: Built Motor, Big Turbo, Big Power.. coming soon.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
6765, erikevo, evo, facing, ff, fit, forward, front, location, manifold, precision, pte, scroll, stock, t3, turbo, twin

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0