 |
|
Feb 22, 2006, 11:31 AM
|
#1
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867
Drives: goggles and a speedo
|
What's the resultant effects of nozzle location?
Can anyone share any info on the theory of nozzle location, the effects, and ideal location in respect to TB for most power (disregarding fit and integrety).
Assume it's on a typical setup - a system about to be installed on a 300whp evo using 80 - 100% methanol with say 375ml/min @ 60psi nozzles, planning to boost to 26 psi..
Like what does moving it closer or further away from TB result in or any other stuff?
Thanks
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 22, 2006, 08:11 PM
|
#2
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 39)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 356
Drives: FWD :(
|
I am also interested in hearing various opinions from people who have experimented with nozzle location !
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 22, 2006, 08:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,458
Drives: a drunken IX
|
60psi against ambient pressure (0 psig) = 375ml/min
60psi against 26 psig boost = ((60-26)/60)^0.5*375 = 282ml/min
You loose about ~25% of injection + atomization will suffer slightly. Why only go with 60psig pressure?
just wondering......
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 22, 2006, 08:36 PM
|
#4
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 24)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: thrillville, IL
Posts: 2,018
Drives: 300+ yards
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Can anyone share any info on the theory of nozzle location, the effects, and ideal location in respect to TB for most power (disregarding fit and integrety).
Assume it's on a typical setup - a system about to be installed on a 300whp evo using 80 - 100% methanol with say 375ml/min @ 60psi nozzles, planning to boost to 26 psi..
Like what does moving it closer or further away from TB result in or any other stuff?
Thanks
|
+2
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 22, 2006, 08:40 PM
|
#5
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 36)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791
Drives: EVO METH MACHINE
|
response is better closer to TB ...i've tried further away...temps are better with nozzle closer and angled to cover more cylinders. I run 100% tried running at 50/50 and car felt weaker...depends on tune.
my 2c
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 12:29 AM
|
#6
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 7)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 584
Drives: 06 GG MR
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evoryder
angled to cover more cylinders.
|
how do you angle for more cylinders?
__________________
AMS 37R Built and Tuned By AMS Assembled By Pepe in JPP Garage 537 awhp 92 w/alky 26 PSI 673 awhp c16 w/alky 39 PSI
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 07:43 AM
|
#7
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 36)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791
Drives: EVO METH MACHINE
|
with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 09:27 AM
|
#8
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 39)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 356
Drives: FWD :(
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evoryder
with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
|
I totally agree with you about spraying WITH the air flow for getting FULL and EVEN water dispersement.
Last edited by Saikou_kun; Feb 26, 2006 at 08:05 PM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 11:16 AM
|
#9
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Coast of MA
Posts: 1,048
Drives: '03 BBY CT9A GSR Vishnu V390
|
thats an interesting idea but i think its already been done. not positive though
__________________
2003 BBY CT9A Evolution GSR Vishnu V390 - Made in October 2003. Bought March 25, 2004.
2004 MS CS6A OZ Rally - Stock
2002 Durango SLT 5.9L - Stock with 3" lift and K&N
My Page:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/709068
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 12:37 PM
|
#10
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 7)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 584
Drives: 06 GG MR
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evoryder
with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
|
nice, might have to try and get that going before saturdays tune
__________________
AMS 37R Built and Tuned By AMS Assembled By Pepe in JPP Garage 537 awhp 92 w/alky 26 PSI 673 awhp c16 w/alky 39 PSI
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 03:32 PM
|
#11
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 36)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791
Drives: EVO METH MACHINE
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EvilBlueEvo8
thats an interesting idea but i think its already been done. not positive though
|
its' definetly been done...
...ive seen it many times...i have my nozzle welded to a hard pipe b4 my TB ...so i'd have to buy a new nozzle. This can be done DIY from parts from a Home Depot/lowes...but having something preconstructed is good...oh and make sure its stainless steel...100% meth is corrossive if using that...like muah
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 03:47 PM
|
#12
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867
Drives: goggles and a speedo
|
Makes sense with closer to TB allowing vapor to go to a gas deeper into compustion.
About how close to TB are we talking about? With it closer the chances of equal distribution to each cyl decreases.
With a 160psi shurflo, exactly what psi sits at the nozzle at max pump setting, and full power?
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 06:18 PM
|
#13
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 87
Drives: 2003 Mitsu Evo
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Makes sense with closer to TB allowing vapor to go to a gas deeper into compustion.
About how close to TB are we talking about? With it closer the chances of equal distribution to each cyl decreases.
With a 160psi shurflo, exactly what psi sits at the nozzle at max pump setting, and full power?
|
is it running progreessive or on/off?
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 23, 2006, 06:24 PM
|
#14
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867
Drives: goggles and a speedo
|
Progressive
|
|
Offline
|
|
Feb 24, 2006, 01:09 PM
|
#15
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Drives: Heavily Modded Pt Cruiser
|
On the cars I have installed it on that are similar to the Evo, I have found that as long as you use small nozzles (for better atomization) and a high pressure pump, the closer to the intake the better. The computer gives full timing advance without messing with your boost levels by seeing a false low temperature by the sensor being saturated with the water/meth. Don't get me wrong, the temps are lowered for the air charge, but the water is still cooler than the surrounding air, so as it hits the sensor, the temp readings are lower than they actually are.
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|