evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > Water/Alcohol Injection & NOS
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 22, 2006, 11:31 AM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (8)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867

Drives: goggles and a speedo

What's the resultant effects of nozzle location?

Can anyone share any info on the theory of nozzle location, the effects, and ideal location in respect to TB for most power (disregarding fit and integrety).

Assume it's on a typical setup - a system about to be installed on a 300whp evo using 80 - 100% methanol with say 375ml/min @ 60psi nozzles, planning to boost to 26 psi..

Like what does moving it closer or further away from TB result in or any other stuff?

Thanks
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2006, 08:11 PM   #2
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (39)
 
Saikou_kun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 356

Drives: FWD :(

I am also interested in hearing various opinions from people who have experimented with nozzle location !
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2006, 08:34 PM   #3
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
SlowCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,458

Drives: a drunken IX

60psi against ambient pressure (0 psig) = 375ml/min

60psi against 26 psig boost = ((60-26)/60)^0.5*375 = 282ml/min

You loose about ~25% of injection + atomization will suffer slightly. Why only go with 60psig pressure?

just wondering......
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2006, 08:36 PM   #4
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (24)
 
lexat20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: thrillville, IL
Posts: 2,018

Drives: 300+ yards

Quote:
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Can anyone share any info on the theory of nozzle location, the effects, and ideal location in respect to TB for most power (disregarding fit and integrety).

Assume it's on a typical setup - a system about to be installed on a 300whp evo using 80 - 100% methanol with say 375ml/min @ 60psi nozzles, planning to boost to 26 psi..

Like what does moving it closer or further away from TB result in or any other stuff?

Thanks
+2
__________________
Kuniiizzzeee Dial-IN

stock and aftermarket parts 4 sale:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/sale-part-outs/183121-need-help-cleaning-out-my-garage-sale.html

This forum requires that you wait 15 seconds between searches. Please try again in 47 seconds....wtf?

MY EVO FOR SALE: http://forums.evolutionm.net/sale-ca...52k-miles.html
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2006, 08:40 PM   #5
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (36)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791

Drives: EVO METH MACHINE

response is better closer to TB ...i've tried further away...temps are better with nozzle closer and angled to cover more cylinders. I run 100% tried running at 50/50 and car felt weaker...depends on tune.

my 2c
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME



Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 12:29 AM   #6
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
 
AlohaEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 584

Drives: 06 GG MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evoryder
angled to cover more cylinders.
how do you angle for more cylinders?
__________________
AMS 37R
Built and Tuned By AMS
Assembled By Pepe in JPP Garage
537 awhp 92 w/alky 26 PSI
673 awhp c16 w/alky 39 PSI
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 07:43 AM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (36)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791

Drives: EVO METH MACHINE

with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME



Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 09:27 AM   #8
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (39)
 
Saikou_kun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 356

Drives: FWD :(

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evoryder
with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
I totally agree with you about spraying WITH the air flow for getting FULL and EVEN water dispersement.

Last edited by Saikou_kun; Feb 26, 2006 at 08:05 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 11:16 AM   #9
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
EvilBlueEvo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Coast of MA
Posts: 1,048

Drives: '03 BBY CT9A GSR Vishnu V390

Send a message via AIM to EvilBlueEvo8
thats an interesting idea but i think its already been done. not positive though
__________________
2003 BBY CT9A Evolution GSR Vishnu V390 - Made in October 2003. Bought March 25, 2004.
2004 MS CS6A OZ Rally - Stock
2002 Durango SLT 5.9L - Stock with 3" lift and K&N

My Page:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/709068
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 12:37 PM   #10
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
 
AlohaEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 584

Drives: 06 GG MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evoryder
with an L bracket/nozzle...vs just having the nozzle spray down ...it sprays past the TB covering more ....
nice, might have to try and get that going before saturdays tune
__________________
AMS 37R
Built and Tuned By AMS
Assembled By Pepe in JPP Garage
537 awhp 92 w/alky 26 PSI
673 awhp c16 w/alky 39 PSI
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 03:32 PM   #11
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (36)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 5,791

Drives: EVO METH MACHINE

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilBlueEvo8
thats an interesting idea but i think its already been done. not positive though
its' definetly been done...
...ive seen it many times...i have my nozzle welded to a hard pipe b4 my TB ...so i'd have to buy a new nozzle. This can be done DIY from parts from a Home Depot/lowes...but having something preconstructed is good...oh and make sure its stainless steel...100% meth is corrossive if using that...like muah
__________________
TEMEVO
"I'm addicted to 100% Methanol : ) "
MACHINES GONE WILD
FOR SALE: FORGE WASTGATE/PERRIN INTAKE CLICK ME



Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 03:47 PM   #12
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (8)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867

Drives: goggles and a speedo

Makes sense with closer to TB allowing vapor to go to a gas deeper into compustion.

About how close to TB are we talking about? With it closer the chances of equal distribution to each cyl decreases.

With a 160psi shurflo, exactly what psi sits at the nozzle at max pump setting, and full power?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 06:18 PM   #13
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
moto17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 87

Drives: 2003 Mitsu Evo

Quote:
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Makes sense with closer to TB allowing vapor to go to a gas deeper into compustion.

About how close to TB are we talking about? With it closer the chances of equal distribution to each cyl decreases.

With a 160psi shurflo, exactly what psi sits at the nozzle at max pump setting, and full power?
is it running progreessive or on/off?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2006, 06:24 PM   #14
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (8)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 3,867

Drives: goggles and a speedo

Progressive
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 24, 2006, 01:09 PM   #15
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15

Drives: Heavily Modded Pt Cruiser

On the cars I have installed it on that are similar to the Evo, I have found that as long as you use small nozzles (for better atomization) and a high pressure pump, the closer to the intake the better. The computer gives full timing advance without messing with your boost levels by seeing a false low temperature by the sensor being saturated with the water/meth. Don't get me wrong, the temps are lowered for the air charge, but the water is still cooler than the surrounding air, so as it hits the sensor, the temp readings are lower than they actually are.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0