evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > Water/Alcohol Injection & NOS
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 9, 2006, 10:08 AM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (24)
 
EvoTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,401

Drives: 03 BBY

Check Valves with Alky Injection.

I am running a SMC kit and I have a check valve right before the nozzle and a gauge a bit downstream of the valve. Once off boost the line pressure drops immediatly. What if I were to put another check valve down at the pump to try to maintain line pressure for better response. Anyone try this yet?
__________________
Most sports use one ball. Racing requires two!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2006, 12:10 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (20)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ozark, MO
Posts: 1,689

Drives: AMS Equipped EVO VIII

Send a message via AIM to GTVEVO
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvoTech
I am running a SMC kit and I have a check valve right before the nozzle and a gauge a bit downstream of the valve. Once off boost the line pressure drops immediatly. What if I were to put another check valve down at the pump to try to maintain line pressure for better response. Anyone try this yet?
You can but I wouldn't think you would see any better responce since the lines really don't expand and fluid don't compress. Everything should be pretty instant but if not it won't hurt. You can purchase higher crack pressure valves but this would only be safe depending on the tuneability you have in the car.
__________________
EVO VIII
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2006, 09:07 AM   #3
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12

Thats not going to work with the 2nd check valve. You can do it with a solnoid, which i am not a fan of using them. They tend to break at the worst time. It takes a fraction of a sec for the system to pressrise its not even worth the extra cost imo
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 12, 2006, 09:17 AM   #4
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
DSMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Blairstown, NJ
Posts: 697

Drives: 03 Yellow Evo, 90 Talon AWD

I cn attest to the solonoid issue. I put together a DIY kit and used the Mcmaster water solonoid tht was recomended in a few DIY online sites. It's plastic body with 3/8 pipe thread in/outlets. Mine would leak through the threads even with very liberal teflon paste or teflon tape. The plastic body evenutally cracked from tightening the pipe thread fitting before it sealed. I replaced it with a metal body NOS fuel solonoid for now. Planning to go with a check valve next.
__________________
03 Yellow Evolution 11.2 @ 126.5
90 Talon AWD 10.0 @ 147

www.DSMotorsport.com
Modifications that work.
Nitrous & AEM EMS Experience

My reply to false allegations by ASA Sung Park:
http://www.diamondstarmotorsport.com/evomreply.shtml
Take a look if you didn't see my side of the story before the thread was deleted for vendor bashing.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 08:11 AM   #5
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15

Drives: Heavily Modded Pt Cruiser

A solenoid will do exactly what you are wanting to do. Just be sure to get one that is designed for that purpose. The DIY ones you see are people trying to 'make due' with easy to access parts. I have hundred's of solenoids being used, with 100% success rate. Not trying to sell anything, just saying to use the right tool for the job.

Thanks,

Greg
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 10:30 AM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
DRWN KIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hesperia & Riverside
Posts: 139

Drives: Silver Evo VIII

Lightbulb Check valve reality

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvoTech
I am running a SMC kit and I have a check valve right before the nozzle and a gauge a bit downstream of the valve. Once off boost the line pressure drops immediatly. What if I were to put another check valve down at the pump to try to maintain line pressure for better response. Anyone try this yet?
Don't forget that almost any check valve that is set up in the free flow direction will reduce the nozzle pressure downstream by two values. The first is the spring pressure which holds it shut and the second is the flow resistance of the valve when open. If you can blow through the valve with your mouth in the free flow direction then the valve has a light spring.
With multiple check valves in a line these pressure drops are added together.
Since most of the systems are developed through experience this is not a problem unless you deviate from how it was developed. In the industrial fluid power world one can buy check valves with various cracking pressures from very low to 60 psi or more in special circumstances. If you install a check valve with a 30 psi cracking pressure spring it will reduce your pressure at the nozzle by a little more than that.
The flow will also be reduced by the pressure in the manifold because the flow is mostly dependent on the pressure differential from the pump to the outlet of the nozzle. I can imagine a system with 30 psig boost, a 30 psig check valve and a 75 psi pump putting out very little flow out of the nozzle. Also the flow you see with the pipe open may or may not be similar to the flow you see with the pipe open during testing.
Also, if you have a perfectly sealed line with a gauge in it that you close behind the check valve the line should stay pressurized to the cracking spring pressure. If you don't see that on the gauge then you have a leak in the solenoid valve seat, lines or the check valve is not sealing.

Another interesting fact about nozzles and orifices is that the flow out of the nozzle is only somewhat linear to pressure in the designed flow ranges. Above a certain limit increasing the pump pressure a lot might only increase the flow a little.

I am looking forward to installing one of these systems on my Evo in the near future. I plan on buying a commercially developed system to piggyback on the knowledge and success of the developer.

Theory is great and a guide but real world experience (understood in the light of theory) is best.
__________________
That purveyor of Puntuated Equilibrium- DRWN KIX
Buschur SAFCII and MBC numerous RMR pipes, AEM short ram,Works Emotions,big custom FMIC,evoVll tail lights, Robi alignment, rear sway bar.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 07:07 PM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (24)
 
EvoTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,401

Drives: 03 BBY

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRWN KIX
Don't forget that almost any check valve that is set up in the free flow direction will reduce the nozzle pressure downstream by two values. The first is the spring pressure which holds it shut and the second is the flow resistance of the valve when open. If you can blow through the valve with your mouth in the free flow direction then the valve has a light spring.
With multiple check valves in a line these pressure drops are added together.
Since most of the systems are developed through experience this is not a problem unless you deviate from how it was developed. In the industrial fluid power world one can buy check valves with various cracking pressures from very low to 60 psi or more in special circumstances. If you install a check valve with a 30 psi cracking pressure spring it will reduce your pressure at the nozzle by a little more than that.
The flow will also be reduced by the pressure in the manifold because the flow is mostly dependent on the pressure differential from the pump to the outlet of the nozzle. I can imagine a system with 30 psig boost, a 30 psig check valve and a 75 psi pump putting out very little flow out of the nozzle. Also the flow you see with the pipe open may or may not be similar to the flow you see with the pipe open during testing.
Also, if you have a perfectly sealed line with a gauge in it that you close behind the check valve the line should stay pressurized to the cracking spring pressure. If you don't see that on the gauge then you have a leak in the solenoid valve seat, lines or the check valve is not sealing.

Another interesting fact about nozzles and orifices is that the flow out of the nozzle is only somewhat linear to pressure in the designed flow ranges. Above a certain limit increasing the pump pressure a lot might only increase the flow a little.

I am looking forward to installing one of these systems on my Evo in the near future. I plan on buying a commercially developed system to piggyback on the knowledge and success of the developer.

Theory is great and a guide but real world experience (understood in the light of theory) is best.

Great response. Thanks
__________________
Most sports use one ball. Racing requires two!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alky, check, injection, running, system, valve

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0