Pure Tuning Borg Warner S259 Dyno Results!
#1
Pure Tuning Borg Warner S259 Dyno Results!
Borg Warner S259 Dyno Results.
Test were performed on our Mustang Dynamometer MD-1100-AWD-SE.
Car: 2003 Evo 8
Engine: 2.0L
Fuel: 93 octane / 118 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S259 / Open T3 .55ar Stainless Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: Magnus (Street)
Cams: HKS 272
Max Boost: 23psi on 93oct / 37psi on 118oct
Atmospheric Temp: 76Deg
Relative Humidity: 5.7%
We will be testing the Kelford Cams and the New Magnus Intake Manifold on this car and will post the results when finished.
Test were performed on our Mustang Dynamometer MD-1100-AWD-SE.
Car: 2003 Evo 8
Engine: 2.0L
Fuel: 93 octane / 118 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S259 / Open T3 .55ar Stainless Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: Magnus (Street)
Cams: HKS 272
Max Boost: 23psi on 93oct / 37psi on 118oct
Atmospheric Temp: 76Deg
Relative Humidity: 5.7%
We will be testing the Kelford Cams and the New Magnus Intake Manifold on this car and will post the results when finished.
Last edited by Keith-PURE Tuning; Oct 27, 2008 at 06:15 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Different dynos will read different though giving a misconception, so you have to compare and use the proper reference.
Thought I would post some pictures of the engine bay.
#10
I would have to look at some of the logs to see if the heat went up drastically enough to cause a loss of power but I highly doubt it did. Again the cars supporting parts including motor design will determine the power layout more than the turbo. I am not a big fan of the cams or the intake manifold that were chosen for the car so we wil be looking to get rid of the engines weaknesses asap. Just thought we would toss up the initial graph for initial viewing.
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, I kinda spoke a lil too soon for my personal experiance. DDL shows I am at 431whp and 401 tq. Another friends car made 420's on pump on a 2.0 last year on a 30r
On the other hand, I didnt think to acount for the .55 housing. I have never heard of 1 that small. I and my friend ran the .82 housing, which might have contributed to the difference in results
Car looks sick tho.
On the other hand, I didnt think to acount for the .55 housing. I have never heard of 1 that small. I and my friend ran the .82 housing, which might have contributed to the difference in results
Car looks sick tho.
#15
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems to spool late for the .55 housing. Curious why you didn't use the .70 T3 housing? I'd love to see a BW S200 series with the divided T3 housing on a divided manifold, should outspool the other housings with more top end.