mcwop23

iTrader: (7)

Mods: Buschur 3" TBE, filter, and MBC, Turboxs FMIC, Nisei LICP, Injen UICP, Works TB seal, Ebay O2 housing

93 Pump made 373WHP/328WTRQ @23psi
93/100%meth made 406WHP/379WTRQ @26.5psi

For reference I have trapped 114.22MPH on straight 93 octane with 329WHP/325WTRQ.

Meth graphs:

leecavturbo

how is meth added?
water injection jet and pump combo?

jaxredevo1

iTrader: (1)

yes it is

IXmr321

iTrader: (3)

Awesome numbers man!

Ultimate CC

iTrader: (122)

nice curve..

leecavturbo

i thought 50/50 water meth was
100% proven better at det suppression
charge cooling?
great numbers tho for little mods

crcain

Nice results but I hope you don't mind me questioning something. No doubt your car is working awesome so this isn't a dig but...

It's just that I would have thought on a Dyno Dynamics a stock Evo would be around 190 - 220 atw. Now your making double that without changing the turbo? Just seems unrealistic to me that a stock turbo would ever make more than maybe 320 atw on a Dyno Dynamics, which is a lower reading dyno than both Mustang and Dynojet.

Boost_Inspired

iTrader: (37)

impressive numbers man , wat are u using for engine management?

scheides

iTrader: (10)

What dyno was that on (i.e. who's dyno dynamics) and what was the correction factor set to? The numbers seem abnormally high. Not trying to hate, but I have never seen a stock IX turbo make that much power. 380 is the most I've ever seen on dyno dynamics, and it was on E85 and 28-29psi of boost!

Good numbers regardless!

KillaItalian904

iTrader: (16)

let the hating begin lmao let me know when u got the cams well push it harder people will believe better when they see the #'s on the 1/4.

scheides

iTrader: (10)

No hating, just curious for more facts man! Dyno Dynamics dynos are very consistent from dyno to dyno, unlike mustangs and dynojets. The only way to throw inconsistency in is with correction factors or loose strapping.

jaxredevo1

iTrader: (1)

let the hating start lol i know what all he has i work on hes car some times and i was at the dyno when he did it.

justboosted02

iTrader: (31)

the numbers do seem high for basic bolt ons and 23psi

Ted B

iTrader: (6)

Who was present doesn't matter. Scheides was simply pointing out that the correction factor for this DD appears not to be "1.0". When the correction factor is changed, the dyno reads higher. This DD seems to be set to give numbers more like a Dynojet - not an uncommon thing these days. Not everyone will realize this, so it is an important detail.

EnzoFerrari

People need to start posting graphs of DD dyno's in shootout mode.
When in Shootout mode DD dyno's cannot have any correction factors changed.
Also all test conditions will be posted on the bottom right hand corner of the graph..

This will stop people argueing about what extra correction was used should be used, etc, etc...