Keith-PURE Tuning

iTrader: (1)

Borg Warner S256 Dyno Results.

Test were performed at Pure Tuning on Mustang Dynamometer MD-1100-AWD-SE.

Dyno Graph 1
Car: 2003 Evo 8
Engine: 2.0L
Fuel: 93 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S256 / Open T3 .55ar Stainless Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: Magnus (Street)
Cams: Tomei Pro 260 / 11.5ex, 11.5in
Max Boost: 22psi @ 4500rpm
Atmospheric Temp: 92Deg
Relative Humidity: 2.7%


Dyno Graph 2
Car:2004 Evo 8
Engine: 2.3L
Fuel: E85 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S256 / Open T3 .70ar Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: HKS Kansai
Cams: Crane 280 / 12ex , 12in
Max Boost: 23psi @ 4800rpm / 26psi @ 5000rpm
Atmospheric Temp: 77Deg
Relative Humidity: 22%

justboosted02

iTrader: (31)

nice numbers, looks like a monster street turbo

YellowEvilEvo

iTrader: (4)

on the second car, you can probably attribute 50 awhp to that 1700 dollar intake :-)

chuntington101

need some pics of the setups now!

Chris.

EvoKnievo

wow, pretty good spool for those numbers.

ONRAILS

iTrader: (7)

wow, that really shows the difference in intakes huh. I wonder how much more power the first car would've made with a stock one

shivaswrath

iTrader: (9)

pictures of it installed?

where can one acquire such a turbo?

thatsMR2u

iTrader: (19)

where these twin scroll or the bullseye t3 single scroll

FullOutPwr

iTrader: (12)

Right from their website. Click Me

mrdevo

iTrader: (4)

Did the housing really add that much lag despite having a 2.3l? Full spool went from 4500 to 4800 with a 2.3l, bigger housing, and intake manifold.

mitsuboost30

iTrader: (34)

Awesome cant wait to get my BW on the dyno...

Exciting News

iTrader: (6)

Thought the same thing. I figured the increased displacement would have offset the the housing and intake manifold size increase. Second chart looks a little peaky.

I like the first setup more.


My guess is that it's an open housing.

Keith-PURE Tuning

iTrader: (1)

The .70ar hotside caused a little of the later spool on the 2.3, but I did forget to put the cam info in the specs. The 2.3L was running some 280 Crane Cams and the 2.0L was running a set of 260 Tomei Cams which is the real reason for the difference in spool.

I'll have to look for pics of the two cars. Not sure if I took any?

Both turbos where standard open T3 turbine inlet.

I'll edit the specs to include the info you guys have brought up.

I'll say that the 2.0L reved crazy fast through the power band. I thought it reved fast on the dyno when I tuned it, but when I took it to the street, third gear is completely unusable because you run into traffic fast when 100mph comes in 2-3seconds.

Thanks for looking

Exciting News

iTrader: (6)

Which Tomeis?
PonCams (low lift) or ProCams (high lift)? They both come advertised as 260.

Keith-PURE Tuning

iTrader: (1)

Procams 260 / 11.5