Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

AMS EVO X Test: Part Two - Boost Control and Fuel Pump test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2008, 12:57 PM
  #1  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (42)
 
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
AMS EVO X Test: Part Two - Boost Control and Fuel Pump test

After it became very clear that the boost tapered off poorly the next course of action was a boost controller and also to check the condition of the factory Fuel Pump

Below is a statement by Martin Musial of AMS (President, Head tuner and Engineer)

"Well we quickly bypassed the factory boost control system, which oddly enough has two boost control solenoids. We set boost to peak at the same factory level of 22psi but this time it held to 16-17psi at redline. Peak power now climbed to 265-270whp, that’s more like it! So now we’re holding roughly the same boost or 1psi more than an EVO IX and we’re making 10-15whp more, looking good"



While we were tearing things apart we thought it would be a good idea to test the limits of the stock EVO X Fuel Pump

Again a statement from Martin:

"We pulled the fuel pump and threw it on fuel pump test rig. Running the voltage supply at 12V and then 14V we measured flow rates at various pressures, from 40psi up to 100psi. The results where a little surprising as the stock EVO X fuel pump flows about 15%-20% more than a stock EVO IX pump. Depending on what the stock injectors are rated at the EVO X could have a stock fuel system that is capable of handling over 350whp."




Stay tuned guys, we are not slowing down anytime soon LOL

Eric
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:03 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SpyderBite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: THE LOU
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow...That's a hell of an increase from just a boost controller.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:09 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
NRGotenks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you guys are moving!
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:16 PM
  #4  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Looks good, keep the info coming!!!
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:28 PM
  #5  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (12)
 
DirectorSe7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More more more!! Now we just need some final produts for sale.

BTW, are these parts going to work on the MR?
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:47 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Robevo RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Park Ridge N.J.
Posts: 10,528
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
nice!
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:49 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
EVIL_EVO_VIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lake Mary,FL
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wow very impressive..Exhaust, intake, piping and fmic should put the car around 350whp+! The question in everyones mind is now, how much power will these new motor hold reliably?

Eric, have you guys had a chance to pull the head off yet? Would be interesting to see how the new head is compared to the IX

Last edited by EVIL_EVO_VIII; Jan 31, 2008 at 01:54 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 01:52 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Guerillah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool, good info.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 02:11 PM
  #9  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
[I]"Well we quickly bypassed the factory boost control system, which oddly enough has two boost control solenoids.
looks like they may have gone to ECU controlled boost rather then load based boost control.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 02:25 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Guerillah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
I disagree here. The IX is still only peaking it's boost at 19psi. Wouldn't it be an apples-to-apples comparison if the IX had 23psi peak boost? This would make it hold even higher boost (than 16-17psi) to redline because the IX won't taper as much. I would gauge from peak boost not tapered boost.
Do you not understand the relationship between boost and the powerband?

Where is peak torque made? You guessed it, right around when full boost hits, roughly 3000~rpm.
Where is peak horsepower made? Towards the upper part of the rpm spectrum, when boost isnt the same as it was at peak torque! WOW

The EVO X makes 22psi peak at 3000rpm! Where peak horsepower is made its not running 22psi, is this so hard to understand? Man you really get on my damn nerves, you try and nit pick anything you can. Now you're disputing with a shop that has made the fastest evo in the world.

The only thing you can gauge off of peak boost is the torque numbers, not horsepower unless it holds the same psi all the way to redline!!!

Last edited by Guerillah; Jan 31, 2008 at 02:29 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 02:33 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 2,046
Received 75 Likes on 65 Posts
Nice.
Old Jan 31, 2008, 02:36 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
 
08LancerEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now thats more like it!!!
Old Jan 31, 2008, 03:13 PM
  #13  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by MR Turco
looks like they may have gone to ECU controlled boost rather then load based boost control.
You mean target psi based instead of target load based. Both are ECU controlled.

I would imagine they have gone to target psi based as it looks like the 10 has a 3 bar MAP sensor.

Once we see the roms we will know more...
Old Jan 31, 2008, 04:11 PM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (42)
 
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Martin went ahead and mapped the Walbro pump in the mix as well

The X Pump is pretty good

[/QUOTE]
Old Jan 31, 2008, 04:37 PM
  #15  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
You mean target psi based instead of target load based. Both are ECU controlled.

I would imagine they have gone to target psi based as it looks like the 10 has a 3 bar MAP sensor.

Once we see the roms we will know more...
yes that is what i meant.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 PM.