Notices
ECU Flash

Pill Placement for ECU Boost Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2007, 08:45 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Question Pill Placement for ECU Boost Control

If I understand correctly, a pill with a smaller hole is needed to increase boost control with the ECU along with modifying the boost tables in the ECU.

My question is this: Is it better to place this pill on the solenoid side or the wastegate side of the boost control hose? What difference would it make putting it one way or the other?

I know that Works places their pill on the wastegate side and not on the solenoid side. What diffrence does it make?

Thanks guys.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 09:59 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
mchuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: h town
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have no idea regarding that. I do know that I use to have 100 for wastegate duty values and got a max of 21-22 psi on my boost gauge, I removed the pill before the solenoid and I get the same effect at 80 duty cycle. Have not logged it, but so far the gauge looks the same.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 11:21 AM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Another method is to remove the pill at the BCS and put in its place a bleeder with a ~0.057-0.059" hole. This is what I'm using to achieve a very flat boost profile at approx 22.5-23 psi.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 01:20 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
 
burgers22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 953
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wastegate side of the T. You may also need to adjust the restrictor at the boost soleniod. On my JDM 7 this was 1.2 mm ID and no mater what I did to the other pill I could not raise boost. I have drill the one near the boost silenoid out to 2 mm ID and run 22 psi.

MB
Old Apr 4, 2007, 02:44 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Just in case you need a diagram to help think about it
Attached Files
File Type: zip
boost.zip (10.9 KB, 75 views)
Old Apr 4, 2007, 03:14 PM
  #6  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
...

Last edited by mrfred; Apr 10, 2007 at 08:44 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 06:30 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wrcwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
OK i have tried multiple pills on the stock system. Here's what i have found

If you go smaller on the wastegate pill, you will boost higher no question. Going from .042" ID ( #58 drill size ) to a .039 ID ( #60 drill size ) will result in ~30 psi. This in combination with #58 BCS pill. You will not be able to regulate it with the BCS, it will just overboost. If you use a #58 turbo pill in combination with a #56 ( .045" ) ID BCS pill you will be able to get 21 tapering to 18.....All this assumes a DV and stock WGA ( 11 psi from factory ).

Removing the turbo pill will only allow wastegate pressure boost ( 8-12 psi )

Removing both requires re doing the system to restrict air to the wastegate. If you place a bleeder in the line to the wastegate you can control the signal to it.
The remaining air signal can be regulated by the BCS going to waste. Not as easy to do .

If you replace the WGA with one from Forge ( i have seen this done ..no other mods..a new piston style WGA ) rated at 17-18 psi and set the preload as per the stock WGA ( 1/2 hole preload ~ 3-4 turns ) using a #58 pill by turbo and #56 by BCS you will see ~25-28 psi but will not be able to regulate it much lower.

The way i see it....the pill by the turbo sets the base boost, while using a bigger BCS pill or none at all allows a bit more. The way i think of it is a boost leak ( turbo pill...smaller= more boost larger turbo pill bigger leak less boost ) . A smaller turbo pill also reduces the amount of air going to the wastegate, allowing it to stay closed longer. OK so why does a larger BCS pill work to add 1-2 psi??? Because it allows for removing the air signal to the wastegate faster. If you stick in a smaller BCS pill you will lose 1-2 psi because the pill restricts the amount of air bled off to ATM letting the signal start to move the WG open slightly.

So If you are running 93 and are using the stock BCS, stock turbo and want 22 tapering to about 19 use a #58 turbo pill and #55 bcs pill. Adjust your table 2 WGDC, error correction, load offset, boost desired load, and Max boost

Set the WGDC initially at 20% at 2500 up to 7500 then log and adjust upwards until you are hitting 22 peak. You can tweak the load offset down to move down in load ( load offset + desired load ) ie 80 +120 = 200 load cell on timing and fuel maps or move it up a bit . You can also tweak the desired load up or down to hit the appropriate load cells. Some tuners set the max boost to 319 max desired load to 159 and zero the error correction table.

<disclaimer>

Do not boost above 23 psi on stock head bolts as this may lead to bad things in time. Use of a good tuner is thoroughly recommended as is a wideband, EGT, accurate boost gauge , and plenty of tuning time changing one thing at a time only.

Old Apr 4, 2007, 08:03 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Spec'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
If I understand correctly, a pill with a smaller hole is needed to increase boost control with the ECU along with modifying the boost tables in the ECU.

My question is this: Is it better to place this pill on the solenoid side or the wastegate side of the boost control hose? What difference would it make putting it one way or the other?

I know that Works places their pill on the wastegate side and not on the solenoid side. What diffrence does it make?

Thanks guys.
Bingo !


These are thread I had book marked.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ede+boost+pill

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...8&postcount=19
Old Apr 4, 2007, 08:27 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
In other worse, the more rectricted pill you put in there, the less duty cycle will be needed to raise your boost X psi.
That is exactly what Works does. They use a pill with a smaller orifice that stock on the turbo side and then they lower the duty cycle from the stock 100 level. They leave the Boost limit table unchanged and boost control offset unchanged. They almost max out the BDEL tables.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 08:36 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Spec'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
That is exactly what Works does. They use a pill with a smaller orifice that stock on the turbo side and then they lower the duty cycle from the stock 100 level. They leave the Boost limit table unchanged and boost control offset unchanged. They almost max out the BDEL tables.
That's interesting. Thanks for sharing that information.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 10:48 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
They leave the Boost limit table unchanged and boost control offset unchanged. They almost max out the BDEL tables.
Sounds like they didn't put too much effort into tuning the boost IMO.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 11:04 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracerut
Sounds like they didn't put too much effort into tuning the boost IMO.
From what I read and from what I was told by a Works P2 flash user, the boost spikes to 21 psi and holds to 19 by redline. That is just right for 91 octane gas IMO.

Since I have their flash and the pill, I will test the boost tables and log the results and report back what I find.
Old Apr 4, 2007, 11:30 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
From what I read and from what I was told by a Works P2 flash user, the boost spikes to 21 psi and holds to 19 by redline. That is just right for 91 octane gas IMO.
From what you described as their settings, it sounds like a sort of 'brute force' tuning, for the lack of a better term.

If their BDELs are almost maxxed out, a relatively stock/minor bolt-on car is not going to be anywhere near those levels in the upper rpm range. So the ECU will just try to crank up the WGDCs to try to hit those loads. Sure, it'll do the job, but not very much 'finese' to it I THINK it'll lead to somewhat erractic boost as the ecu is trying to adjust the wastegate duty cycle based on the values in the correction table.
Old Apr 5, 2007, 06:33 AM
  #14  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by wrcwannabe
OK i have tried multiple pills on the stock system. Here's what i have found

If you go smaller on the wastegate pill, you will boost higher no question.
...

Last edited by mrfred; Apr 10, 2007 at 08:44 PM.
Old Apr 5, 2007, 08:32 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracerut
From what you described as their settings, it sounds like a sort of 'brute force' tuning, for the lack of a better term.

If their BDELs are almost maxxed out, a relatively stock/minor bolt-on car is not going to be anywhere near those levels in the upper rpm range. So the ECU will just try to crank up the WGDCs to try to hit those loads. Sure, it'll do the job, but not very much 'finese' to it I THINK it'll lead to somewhat erractic boost as the ecu is trying to adjust the wastegate duty cycle based on the values in the correction table.
Check this post out from Works. I know it is from the vendor and vendors are suspect, but if their testing results is correct, then they have pretty good boost control.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...63&postcount=6

Here is the full thread.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ht=Works+boost

I will test their system and see for myself.


Quick Reply: Pill Placement for ECU Boost Control



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 AM.