 |
|
Aug 2, 2009, 01:33 AM
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCali
Posts: 94
Drives: 2006 EVO IX MR, 2007 Porsche GT3, 2002 Ford Ranger with new tires.
|
Skunk2 Intake manifold Review
Disclaimer, this is my experience with the new Skunk2 Evo intake manifold, Wow!!!
Product Installation
Nothing but problems and all with the installation... first off I wanna quote "Skunk2's all-new, cast-aluminum Evo Pro Series Intake Manifold�which was tested and developed on the company's own Evo Time Attack race car�is a direct-fit replacement and offers ... blah, blah" well they don’t say whether their Time Attack car is an evo IX because if it is I’d like to know how they got it to fit without hitting the MIVEC Control module and the Cylinder head water pipe (larger than the Evo VIII)???? I had to take the manifold to a machine shop and have it machined (professionally) for it to fit, wow BIG DISAPPOINTMENT!  If anyone of you guys have ever taken an intake manifold off before, it’s a real pain in the ass!!! I never would have thought in a million years that this thing would be such a *****, oh well that’s why I paid to have it done, but I couldn’t help but feel for them.
The second problem and I will quote (again, Skunks advertisement) “ Skunk2's Evo Pro Series Intake Manifold is a simple bolt-on affair. Unlike other intake manifolds, Skunk2's incorporates the factory configuration, leaving the throttle body in its original location, which means the original intercooler piping and hoses can be reused.” The throttle body is not kept in the original position, because if it was it would have fit flawlessly like my stock manifold w/ TB did connecting to my ETS UICP (short route), now you can play with the wording all you want ie “original intercooler piping and hoses can be reused.”, yes they can, if the original intake manifold will fit my ETS piping flawlessly then it should fit the Skunk2 intake manifold flawlessly, I mean they did say it!!! incorporates the factory configuration, leaving the throttle body in its original location It didn’t it was off and I mean SHORT, real short! They (my tuner) had to really pull on it to get it to connect while another person used an electrical ratchet gun to fasten the T bolt down, “simple bolt-on affair”, hardly the case!!!
Product Quality (quality control)
The whole point of this purchase was for the so called OEM style cast design and simple install, I won't even get into all the casting debris that filled the runners  total downer, and as far as the smooth transitions from the throttle body opening to the plenum to the runners, well put it this way. They are now, special thanks to James at Reese Tuning for the time and effort 
I'm not to worried about all the casting imperfections on the undersides of the manifold but on the visible and in plain sight, there are just way to many for my liking. One of my brass fittings is actually cracked abit, wow how do you miss that?
Tuning and Performance
Wish I had Tuning results to share, but we ran out of time!
Now maybe I just a lemon or maybe inspector 17 just had a bad day, I'd hate to think all these intake manifolds are like this, so buyer beware
__________________
FP Red // Cosworth // Skunk2 // Brain Crower // Buschur // Perrin // MIL SPEC // Spark Tech // GM // AMS // ETS // Synapse // Cobb // Invidia // ACT // ARP // JMF //PTE //E85
Reese Tuned
443whp/408tq @32psi MD500 euro
stock ecu
stock maf
stock block&head
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 01:44 AM
|
#2
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 499
Drives: 2003 Evolution VIII
|
damn strike 2 for skunk2 so far their throttle body and intake manifold are bad reviews
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 02:02 AM
|
#3
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 10)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: southcal
Posts: 15
Drives: evolution VIII
|
dam im glad that you wrote this review cuz i was debating on get a milspec ported mani, the skunk mani, and reese ported mani!
I guess that ill send my spare mani to milspec.
I wanna see the power!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 02:57 AM
|
#4
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 27)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 744
Drives: 2005 evo 8
|
wow, skunk really dropped the ball with the evo market. First the tb was FAIL then this lol.
__________________
(700hp)6.6@111mph on Stock SSL car, With a sunroof lol
762hp and 608tq on the stock ecu!
771hp & 606tq - New
800s are next
Sponsored by:
ETS
JM Fab
Force-Fed Performance
|
|
Online
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 08:55 AM
|
#5
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Posts: 1,467
Drives: 05 electric Blue Evo, 04 Blue R1, 95 Nissan pickup lowrider
|
Not good
__________________
3" turbo back exhaust , Forge MBC, Walbro 255 fuel pump ,Helix lower I/C piping, Exhaust Manifold with o2 housing, Synapse BOV , huge I/C, 272 HKS cams, Head studs, Buschur Upper i/c pipe, Braille mini battery, Buschur intake pipe with cone filter, ported and polished intake manifold, 65MM Throttle body, Meth with 50/50 mix, 30psi custom tune by Chris Black at AMS
380WHP
392WTQ
JDM rear bumper
Recently added Spoolinup COP setup
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 08:59 AM
|
#6
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 15)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Colony, TX
Posts: 2,581
Drives: Wicked White Evo IX GSR
|
Not surprising to hear their intake manifold is a total POS just like their throttle body is. Rip that crap off your car and get a nice ported stock IM/TB combo and be done with it.
|
|
Online
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 09:08 AM
|
#7
|
|
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: ( 7)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lansdale
Posts: 2,677
Drives: Tarmac Black IX SE- Blown Transfer Case
|
haha....just as I thought. Sorry bro, I'm not laughing at you. One of the things I noticed by the pics is that the plenum seemed too short and it definately looked like it would put the throttle body in a different spot. Aftermarket companies really suck sometimes.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 09:14 AM
|
#8
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,958
Drives: 05 Evo8 SSL
|
Do you have any pics of the issues you saw?
What a disappointment
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 09:29 AM
|
#9
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 15)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 362
Drives: 2001 Mitsu Evo7 RS-2
|
That sucks, there throttle body got bad reviews and well. Enough that i knew i wouldn't have purchased this from them.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 12:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 13)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas and HATING it
Posts: 2,765
Drives: WW Evo IX Buschur Race car. 97 GTi VR6T, self built and tuned. 98 Jetta VR6 DD.
|
Sorry to hear about all this. I just searched for there manifold and it looks like a Nice unit, combined with the t-body 1 would think it would be an awsome setup. But it apairs all there sh*t sucks?
I am looking to get a new intake manifold, I wanna get this Wilson junk off my car asap! Its looking like I will go with Buschurs new manifold or the new DI?
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 12:42 PM
|
#11
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 287
Drives: evo 9 mr
|
I think they should just stick to hondas i had good gains from their intake manifold on my type r....
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 05:36 PM
|
#12
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 74)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,448
Drives: Evo MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwjeff
I wanna get this Wilson junk off my car asap!
|
Now Wilson is junk? Allow us to agree to disagree on that "small" point.
I sincerely hope you never run a business, because karma can be a beotch.
__________________
GO HERE TO SEND US A TB: http://forums.evolutionm.net/showpos...&postcount=158
GET 100 cell race cats: http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sal...available.html
GET MIL.SPEC TB'S HERE:
AMS CHICAGO, IL
CBRD YORK, PA
ENGLISH RACING CAMAS, WA
GST HAYWARD, CA
MAP PLYMOUTH, MN
MFQ BURBANK, CA
SPEED ELEMENT FREMONT, CA
REESE TUNING SANTEE, CA
TTP ORLANDO, FL
TUNING TECH COLTON, CA
Last edited by Erik@MIL.SPEC; Aug 2, 2009 at 06:11 PM.
|
|
Online
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 05:39 PM
|
#13
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 5)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gator Nation(UF)
Posts: 617
Drives: 06 Evo IX SE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
Now Wilson is junk? Allow us to agree to disagree on that "small" point.
|
please explain guys....i always though wilson was a great brand and we saw many great results 
back on topic:
i guess this sucks too..aww well there are better ones out there right
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 05:46 PM
|
#14
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 137
Drives: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDRINKV8'S
I think they should just stick to hondas i had good gains from their intake manifold on my type r....
|
^^^ Same here, I had good gains on my b-series powered teg... They really should just stick to Honda
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 2, 2009, 05:56 PM
|
#15
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: FLA-HI-SoCal
Posts: 1,000
Drives: 2.slow Evo IX
|
Did James recommend this...? You should have had Aby/Mil.Spec make you the new R2 intake manifold...
Great Review, to bad it didnt work out for you...
__________________
-MattDennison-
TuningTechnologies ROBISPEC /// MISHIMOTO PROSPORTGAUGES MIL.SPEC SPYOPTICS+
2009 Redline Time Attack - Stock-AWD - Champion
ahh...ocean life
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
|
Tags
|
evo, hondas, im, install, intake, invidia, manifold, manifolds, performance, pro, review, skunk, skunk2, type, wilson  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|