Forced Performance Buschur Racing HTA86 .82 turbo review 700awhp DLL @40psi stock ecu - Page 3

Mellon Tuning · Feb 5, 2009, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

You know tephra v6 is gonna have gear-dependent boost tables?

This would mean no more switch flipping for you!

I considered going with the Eboost2 for that feature a while back. The only reason I'd consider changing the greddy out now is if I decide to run more than 43psi (the max it can control) I'm happy with it.

Boost3dxEvO · Feb 5, 2009, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

That's his EBC, kinda why I asked about switching to ecu-controlled boost to begin with.

Side note: Mellon, you know I'm not hatin, right?! Do what you want, it's your car man!

Scheides, I think you should personally line up next to mellon and show him that bad boy gm solenoid and then see if the minor differences of the EBC and gm solenoid truly do make a difference

rockbmx1 · Feb 10, 2009, 01:39 AM

When did you make full boost by with your hta3582r? Also when do you make full boost by with your hta3586r? I am trying to decide between these two turbos, and I can't make up my mind. Right now I have a t3 60-1 with a p-trim turbine in a .82ar housing. I am only making 5psi at like 5-5200rpm. I hate the lag. Also the top end isn't worth the lag. I don't mind lag as long as there is something worth waiting for. Thanks.

Mellon Tuning · Feb 10, 2009, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockbmx1

When did you make full boost by with your hta3582r? Also when do you make full boost by with your hta3586r? I am trying to decide between these two turbos, and I can't make up my mind. Right now I have a t3 60-1 with a p-trim turbine in a .82ar housing. I am only making 5psi at like 5-5200rpm. I hate the lag. Also the top end isn't worth the lag. I don't mind lag as long as there is something worth waiting for. Thanks.

I don't have the answers

scheides · Feb 10, 2009, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boost3dxEvO

Scheides, I think you should personally line up next to mellon and show him that bad boy gm solenoid and then see if the minor differences of the EBC and gm solenoid truly do make a difference

Don't be silly. I'm just trying to give friendly advice/ideas to someone who's doing amazing things with their car. If he doesn't want to even try it, I will roll my eyes but still drool in amazement at how fast it is.

Boost3dxEvO · Feb 10, 2009, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scheides

Don't be silly. I'm just trying to give friendly advice/ideas to someone who's doing amazing things with their car. If he doesn't want to even try it, I will roll my eyes but still drool in amazement at how fast it is.

Hehe. I know I'm silly

I'm just poking some fun!

Kracka · Feb 10, 2009, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning

I like to keep my boost control simple. Some people see the slight boost increase towards redline as a problem, I see it as an advantage

I don't blame you for that! Scheides talked me into a GM BCS and I've regretted it since day 1. First I tried load-based and that was just dumb, then I dropped another $150 on a JDM 3-bar MAP sensor and that was a lot better, but still time-consuming and tedious to adjust. I wish I would have stayed with the $38 Joe P MBC since they are cheap, effective, and easy to adjust.

vboy425 · Feb 10, 2009, 09:36 AM

man looking like you have boost creep issue too even with a 44mm WG. I guess my issue is normal.

Mellon Tuning · Feb 10, 2009, 09:38 AM

boost creep isn't an issue!

vboy425 · Feb 10, 2009, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning

boost creep isn't an issue!

i guess not anymore. I thought i was the only one. All this and that people said my WG was too small blah blah. Now look, even with a 44mm WG you have still boost creep.

scheides · Feb 10, 2009, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S2kracka

I don't blame you for that! Scheides talked me into a GM BCS and I've regretted it since day 1. First I tried load-based and that was just dumb, then I dropped another $150 on a JDM 3-bar MAP sensor and that was a lot better, but still time-consuming and tedious to adjust. I wish I would have stayed with the $38 Joe P MBC since they are cheap, effective, and easy to adjust.

Try harder. Just because you haven't spent the time to make it work doesn't mean it sucks. I have been using this setup for a year and a half, love it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vboy425

man looking like you have boost creep issue too even with a 44mm WG. I guess my issue is normal.

Mellon's right, he does not. That's the reason I'm suggesting the ecu controlled boost, instead of a static hz value boost onset can be improved and top end can be leveled off.

vboy425 · Feb 10, 2009, 10:08 AM

Scheides, ECU boost control would not work for what we do. We race on a road course and time is very limited. For every pit stop, we have others crap to look at rather than trying to adjust the ecu boost table. MBC is a better setup for me.

TakaseEVOIXSE · Feb 11, 2009, 11:44 AM

wow Chris 700whp?! that is indeed an accomplishment. 9s for sure! incredible...

stunt1o1 · Feb 11, 2009, 03:36 PM

mellon, your car is sick and your tuning is on point..I can't wait for my car to run like yours r even better

Good luck this tear

mrtalon20 · Feb 11, 2009, 06:27 PM

I love this car.