2002 civic si - Page 2

b_tapper · Mar 24, 2002, 09:10 AM

se-r
slow
ugly
stupid engine choice
not much potential for the engine
does have that sweet tranny though

why can't they just drop a sr20det in it?
it fit nicely into older sentras

DEVOTED · Mar 24, 2002, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by EvoSouL

Is this post really necessary? Although this car doesn't please me I don't think it's cool to put it down unless you've fully tested one out.

How Ironic of you to say that...

You ever drove a Lancer??

lanceroz84 · Mar 24, 2002, 10:21 AM

EVER DROVE A LANCER OZ WITH $1000 OF MODS .YOU WOULD BE SURPISED I KNOW I WAS IT'S JUST GREAT

OzRally02 · Mar 24, 2002, 10:46 AM

BTAPPER YOU ARE KILLING ME, you think the SeR is ugly and the new SI is good ARGH!?! And no its not a the best engine but it still out performs the SI when it comes to Civic or Sentra I would take the Sentra, but I guess you are entitled to your opinion

Lan Evo · Mar 24, 2002, 12:48 PM

Guys, I hope you can keep this discussion as civil/logic/objective as possible. You're free to express you opinion, however, I would not like to see flaming on other members.

I do not have the chance to test drive a new Civic just yet, so I can't express my throught on this topic; however, please be rational on your discussion. Until then, everything is just PERSONAL OPINION...

chill, guys

EvoSouL · Mar 24, 2002, 09:26 PM

PERSONAL OPINION and personal preference is correct. Of course Mitsubishi owners are going to flame whatever cars they can pick on for Hondas, etc. or whatever they don't own and I'm sure muscle heads like to flame the rest of us. It's an endless battle on what's better and what's not. So what's the use with all the fuss?

EvoSouL · Mar 24, 2002, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DEVOTED

How Ironic of you to say that...

You ever drove a Lancer??

As for this question, I'll let out my PERSONAL OPINION not meaning to flame anyone... I would rather test drive the new SI way b4 even considering getting into a lancer. I have friends who own VW Corrados, Nissan Maximas/Sentras, Mitsubishi Eclipses, etc. most who all think of the u.s. spec lancer as a "fake" representation of the Evo. Heck they even hate civics for the same reason that people "rice" it out etc., etc.
It all comes down to what you have and what you don't to chose sides and to say one thing is better than the other.

Angel · Mar 29, 2002, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by b_tapper
se-r
slow
ugly
stupid engine choice
not much potential for the engine
does have that sweet tranny though

why can't they just drop a sr20det in it?
it fit nicely into older sentras

You have no taste at all Bry but then I guess we should have figured that out by what you drive right now.

Angel · Mar 29, 2002, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by b_tapper
The new SI is a great DRIVERS car. May not be straight line fast but it handles like a kart does. I like how it looks too.

A drivers car ohhh really...do tell. Now your starting to sound like those i-club assses.

Angel · Mar 29, 2002, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OzRally02
I'm just saying that there are better cars out there for the money but people are gonna just buy it cause it says \-/ on the damn hood..... Ford Focus SVT, Sentra SeR, VW Golf GTI are all better cars in all areas: handling, acceleration, comfort and they all cost just about the same amount but so many people are gonna buy the SI and its just annoying, then they will put their big "TYPE R" in the front window thinking they are cool.... Its just very annoying, I am not anti Honda, I am just anti-civic

Civics are not bad cars at all..but you can't put it in the same categpry with a s-er and gti imho....the focus I'm not a fan of.

I'd take a gti and old se-r(hell I'd even take a new one) or a civic hatch and hook them up before I wasted my money on that new si.

I say waste cause i p[ut money into cars and I'd rather have something worth spending on.

OzRally02 · Mar 29, 2002, 11:19 PM

I LOVE YOU ANGEL!!!! MORE POWER TO YOU!!!

lanceroz84 · Mar 30, 2002, 01:00 AM

the 2000 civic si was some much better then the 2003. Higher topspeed and a way better engine to work with to mod it.so i think the 2003 civic si suckass .check these out
lancers oz=$16,587
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 6.3 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 8.9 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 11.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 15.9 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 20.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 28.5 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.9 mph

civic si 2003=$19,895

0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.5 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.2 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.7 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 8.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 10.4 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 13.1 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 17.5 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 22.4 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.1 s @ 86.8 mph

civic si 2000=$11,360 to $18,600
2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.0 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.4 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 7.5 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 9.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 12 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 15.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 20.0 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.7 s @ 89.6 mph

sentra spec-v=$18,832
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.4 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 3.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 4.8 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 7.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 8.9 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 11.3 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 14.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 18.9 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.3 s @ 91 mph

2002 Volkswagen GTI 1.8T=$19,910
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.3 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 3.7 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.1 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 6.6 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 9.0 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 11.6 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 14.3 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 18.8 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.3 s @ 92.8 mph

Angel · Mar 30, 2002, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lanceroz84
the 2000 civic si was some much better then the 2003. Higher topspeed and a way better engine to work with to mod it.so i think the 2003 civic si suckass .check these out
lancers oz=$16,587
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 6.3 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 8.9 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 11.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 15.9 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 20.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 28.5 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.9 mph

civic si 2003=$19,895

0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.5 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.2 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.7 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 8.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 10.4 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 13.1 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 17.5 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 22.4 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.1 s @ 86.8 mph

civic si 2000=$11,360 to $18,600
2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.0 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.4 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 7.5 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 9.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 12 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 15.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 20.0 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.7 s @ 89.6 mph

sentra spec-v=$18,832
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.4 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 3.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 4.8 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 7.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 8.9 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 11.3 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 14.9 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 18.9 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.3 s @ 91 mph

2002 Volkswagen GTI 1.8T=$19,910
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.3 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 3.7 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 5.1 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 6.6 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 9.0 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 11.6 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 14.3 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 18.8 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 15.3 s @ 92.8 mph

you yourself raced all thses right? didn't think so.....no mag racing please that's so lame. Go out to the track them come back and spew numbers to me with some time slips.

Angel · Mar 30, 2002, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by OzRally02
I LOVE YOU ANGEL!!!! MORE POWER TO YOU!!!

Thanks you very much...

Mar 30, 2002, 01:24 AM

I really like the civic si's shift position, wish that came on the Lancer.