Climate change treaty...

[LT1runner]

...that will be law in this country. So they don't have to pass a climate change bill/carbon credit tax bill through our legislative bodies. They just have to sign a eurpean style treaty (because our so-called leaders love european\globalists law) that will be enforced via the UN delegated to local eco police type organization. The UN will be telling you what to do through this treaty that will be signed by obama in dec. Know that this will be a carbon tax. It will take precedence over the US Constituition. This is scary stuff. This is from the un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.

Check this vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...ayer_embedded#

Pay attention to this. See for yourself at the sections I'm highlighting.

Here's the PDF

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/doc...hagen-2009.pdf

Page 17
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on
adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds
and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will
operate as such, as appropriate.

The "scheme" will be a gov't unto itself. A gov't "ruled by the COP..." It just gets worse with the (b) section

Page 35 subsection (c)
taking away tax breaks.

Page 43 section 41
[Providing financial support shall be additional to developed countries’ ODA targets.]
(c) [Levies on CO2 emissions [from Annex-I Parties [in a position to do so]];]
(d) [Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties;]

So taxes on CO2 emissions and carbon based products. Can you think of anything in your house that is carbon based? How about human beings? How about floors and stuff.

Page 64
(vii) Progressive reduction or phasing out of market imperfections, fiscal incentives,
tax and duty exemptions and subsidies in all greenhouse gas emitting sectors that
run counter to the objective of the Convention and application of market
instruments;

You are not going to be getting any exemptions. Only the big corps are going to get them not the little guy.

Page 83
(f) [Cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes] and the use of new and existing
[flexible][carbon-market] mechanisms, including project- and program-based CDM;

Welcome to cap and trade for you! You will pay, not the big boys they say are doing all the bad stuff.

Page 134
Alternative 3:
A mechanism for financing climate change actions by monetizing emission allowances through auctioning is hereby established. This financial mechanism implies that a certain proportion of the total number of emission allowances under the Copenhagen Agreement is held back and auctioned at the international level...

scroll down
Alternative 2:
Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties.5

Page 142
53. The EBFTM will be supported by five technical panels: research and development; capacitybuilding; transfer of technologies for mitigation; REDD plus, and market mechanisms. The technical panels shall comprise government representatives, elected by the COP with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters related to each of the technical panels, and be open to input from other experts.

The COP will "elect" more like appoint people over you in the respects of cap and trade\carbon tax. Which means everything you have and do, and how you use all that you have.

Page 160
37. [The Annex I countries shall institute incentives at the national level notably tax exemption and subsidies for the owner of patented technology with a view to promoting transfer and diffusion of the environmentally sound technologies to the developing countries;]

Well who are the "owners of patented technology"? Al Gore types.

Page 164
Alternative to Option 2:
[Establish an Executive Body on Technology (EBT), as a subsidiary body of the Convention, in accordance with its Article 7.2 (i). The EBT shall be composed of government representatives, elected by the COP, with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters of technology development and transfer. The EBT shall: (the following can be put in an Annex to the decision to establish the EBT, as terms of reference, organizational structure, functions, etc…)

The COP elects people appointed over you, no the American people. The COP is a sub group under the UN.

Page 173
(c) Specific sources including, parts of regular fiscal budget for research and development,
fiscal revenue from taxation on carbon transaction and/or auction of emission permits in
carbon market, as well as fiscal revenue from energy or environmental taxation in
developed countries;

Page 175
57. All Parties shall ensure that interest payments made through the renewable energy and energy efficiency bond mechanism will be tax free within their domestic jurisdiction.

If you use the "new green technology" you may not be taxed so much. I wonder who will be the patent owners of the that technology you'll be forced to go to or pay out the arse in crazy taxes.

[Basalix]

tl;dr

But I am sure there is plenty in there to piss me off. Thanks...

[thetox]

Originally Posted by LT1runner

...that will be law in this country. So they don't have to pass a climate change bill/carbon credit tax bill through our legislative bodies. They just have to sign a eurpean style treaty (because our so-called leaders love european\globalists law) that will be enforced via the UN delegated to local eco police type organization. The UN will be telling you what to do through this treaty that will be signed by obama in dec. Know that this will be a carbon tax. It will take precedence over the US Constituition. This is scary stuff. This is from the un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.

Check this vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...ayer_embedded#

Pay attention to this. See for yourself at the sections I'm highlighting.

Here's the PDF

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/doc...hagen-2009.pdf

Page 17
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on
adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds
and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will
operate as such, as appropriate.

The "scheme" will be a gov't unto itself. A gov't "ruled by the COP..." It just gets worse with the (b) section

Page 35 subsection (c)
taking away tax breaks.

Page 43 section 41
[Providing financial support shall be additional to developed countries’ ODA targets.]
(c) [Levies on CO2 emissions [from Annex-I Parties [in a position to do so]];]
(d) [Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties;]

So taxes on CO2 emissions and carbon based products. Can you think of anything in your house that is carbon based? How about human beings? How about floors and stuff.

Page 64
(vii) Progressive reduction or phasing out of market imperfections, fiscal incentives,
tax and duty exemptions and subsidies in all greenhouse gas emitting sectors that
run counter to the objective of the Convention and application of market
instruments;

You are not going to be getting any exemptions. Only the big corps are going to get them not the little guy.

Page 83
(f) [Cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes] and the use of new and existing
[flexible][carbon-market] mechanisms, including project- and program-based CDM;

Welcome to cap and trade for you! You will pay, not the big boys they say are doing all the bad stuff.

Page 134
Alternative 3:
A mechanism for financing climate change actions by monetizing emission allowances through auctioning is hereby established. This financial mechanism implies that a certain proportion of the total number of emission allowances under the Copenhagen Agreement is held back and auctioned at the international level...

scroll down
[b]Alternative 2:
Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties.5

Page 142
53. The EBFTM will be supported by five technical panels: research and development; capacitybuilding; transfer of technologies for mitigation; REDD plus, and market mechanisms. The technical panels shall comprise government representatives, elected by the COP with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters related to each of the technical panels, and be open to input from other experts.

The COP will "elect" more like appoint people over you int he respects of cap amd trade\carbon tax. Which means everything you have and do, and how you use all that you have.

Page 160
37. [The Annex I countries shall institute incentives at the national level notably tax exemption and subsidies for the owner of patented technology with a view to promoting transfer and diffusion of the environmentally sound technologies to the developing countries;]

Well who are the "owners of patented technology"?

Page 164
Alternative to Option 2:
[Establish an Executive Body on Technology (EBT), as a subsidiary body of the Convention, in accordance with its Article 7.2 (i). The EBT shall be composed of government representatives, elected by the COP, with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters of technology development and transfer. The EBT shall: (the following can be put in an Annex to the decision to establish the EBT, as terms of reference, organizational structure, functions, etc…)

The COP elects people appointed over you, no the American people. The COP is a sub group under the UN.

Page 173
(c) Specific sources including, parts of regular fiscal budget for research and development,
fiscal revenue from taxation on carbon transaction and/or auction of emission permits in
carbon market, as well as fiscal revenue from energy or environmental taxation in
developed countries;

Page 175
57. All Parties shall ensure that interest payments made through the renewable energy and energy efficiency bond mechanism will be tax free within their domestic jurisdiction.

If you use the "new green technology" you may not be taxed so much. I wonder who will be the patent owners of the that technology you'll be forced to go to or pay out the arse in crazy taxes.

tl;dr.

[Lancer7]

Originally Posted by thetox

tl;dr.

I think that's the response the government hopes to get from the public every time. Hence why the healthcare reform bill is so long.

[LT1runner]

Originally Posted by Lancer7

I think that's the response the government hopes to get from the public every time. Hence why the healthcare reform bill is so long.

You got that right. There is so much more. I just tried to get it down to the picture getter version.

[otter]

I see a lot of issues with your points but I'm not feeling motivated to reply to each of them at the moment. All I'm going to say right now is that you're making huge assumptions off of very little information. Just like every other FUD-based forwarded e-mail.

[SmikeEvo]

You know whats a better way to save the environment?

[krnkimchi702]

EAT A BABY!!! nom nom nom

i mean.. uh.. drive a prius

[LT1runner]

Well this isn't a fwd'd email. I used the PDF linked above and pasted all that is in bold. Page and section included. Now if what I typed in plain text below the bold type doesn't mean what I commented on below the bold portions, then correct them point by point if you feel what I wrote isn't accurate. But what's in bold is copied and pasted directly from the treaty PDF linked above the 1st post. I have no issues with being corrected when I'm wrong.

[SmikeEvo]

Originally Posted by krnkimchi702

EAT A BABY!!! nom nom nom

i mean.. uh.. drive a prius

EXACTLY. Humanity never has the gall to do this. But the root of the planets problem is humanity itself. Less people = better planet. Better planet = better for all (who are still here).

Yes, is that mean. You bet. People die. Life sucks.

[krnkimchi702]

see guys.. im helping to save the planet

[CaliMR]

Originally Posted by LT1runner

...that will be law in this country. So they don't have to pass a climate change bill/carbon credit tax bill through our legislative bodies. They just have to sign a eurpean style treaty (because our so-called leaders love european\globalists law) that will be enforced via the UN delegated to local eco police type organization. The UN will be telling you what to do through this treaty that will be signed by obama in dec. Know that this will be a carbon tax. It will take precedence over the US Constituition. This is scary stuff. This is from the un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.

Check this vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...ayer_embedded#

Pay attention to this. See for yourself at the sections I'm highlighting.

Here's the PDF

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/doc...hagen-2009.pdf

Page 17
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on
adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds
and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will
operate as such, as appropriate.

The "scheme" will be a gov't unto itself. A gov't "ruled by the COP..." It just gets worse with the (b) section

Page 35 subsection (c)
taking away tax breaks.

Page 43 section 41
[Providing financial support shall be additional to developed countries’ ODA targets.]
(c) [Levies on CO2 emissions [from Annex-I Parties [in a position to do so]];]
(d) [Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties;]

So taxes on CO2 emissions and carbon based products. Can you think of anything in your house that is carbon based? How about human beings? How about floors and stuff.

Page 64
(vii) Progressive reduction or phasing out of market imperfections, fiscal incentives,
tax and duty exemptions and subsidies in all greenhouse gas emitting sectors that
run counter to the objective of the Convention and application of market
instruments;

You are not going to be getting any exemptions. Only the big corps are going to get them not the little guy.

Page 83
(f) [Cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes] and the use of new and existing
[flexible][carbon-market] mechanisms, including project- and program-based CDM;

Welcome to cap and trade for you! You will pay, not the big boys they say are doing all the bad stuff.

Page 134
Alternative 3:
A mechanism for financing climate change actions by monetizing emission allowances through auctioning is hereby established. This financial mechanism implies that a certain proportion of the total number of emission allowances under the Copenhagen Agreement is held back and auctioned at the international level...

scroll down
[b]Alternative 2:
Taxes on carbon-intensive products and services from Annex I Parties.5

Page 142
53. The EBFTM will be supported by five technical panels: research and development; capacitybuilding; transfer of technologies for mitigation; REDD plus, and market mechanisms. The technical panels shall comprise government representatives, elected by the COP with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters related to each of the technical panels, and be open to input from other experts.

The COP will "elect" more like appoint people over you int he respects of cap amd trade\carbon tax. Which means everything you have and do, and how you use all that you have.

Page 160
37. [The Annex I countries shall institute incentives at the national level notably tax exemption and subsidies for the owner of patented technology with a view to promoting transfer and diffusion of the environmentally sound technologies to the developing countries;]

Well who are the "owners of patented technology"?

Page 164
Alternative to Option 2:
[Establish an Executive Body on Technology (EBT), as a subsidiary body of the Convention, in accordance with its Article 7.2 (i). The EBT shall be composed of government representatives, elected by the COP, with balanced regional representation, who are experts on matters of technology development and transfer. The EBT shall: (the following can be put in an Annex to the decision to establish the EBT, as terms of reference, organizational structure, functions, etc…)

The COP elects people appointed over you, no the American people. The COP is a sub group under the UN.

Page 173
(c) Specific sources including, parts of regular fiscal budget for research and development,
fiscal revenue from taxation on carbon transaction and/or auction of emission permits in
carbon market, as well as fiscal revenue from energy or environmental taxation in
developed countries;

Page 175
57. All Parties shall ensure that interest payments made through the renewable energy and energy efficiency bond mechanism will be tax free within their domestic jurisdiction.

If you use the "new green technology" you may not be taxed so much. I wonder who will be the patent owners of the that technology you'll be forced to go to or pay out the arse in crazy taxes.

And back by popular demand: panda train

[thetox]

my cousin's wife was shooting a photoshoot today with Al Gore and some other people here in philly. i told her to tell him that I burn nothing but the finest 93 octane fuel at a high rate possibly unrelated to your story

[hotrod2448]

Originally Posted by otter

I see a lot of issues with your points but I'm not feeling motivated to reply to each of them at the moment. All I'm going to say right now is that you're making huge assumptions off of very little information. Just like every other FUD-based forwarded e-mail.

And you are assuming the government (read: illuminate) isn't out to enslave you.

[otter]

Originally Posted by hotrod2448

And you are assuming the government (read: illuminate) isn't out to enslave you.

Yeah, I guess that's a fault I'm known for