evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > MAFTpro
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 20, 2006, 12:15 PM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,560

Drives: 03 Evo VIII bought new, orignal owner

T&TP and others: Please help with MAF Translator

First, I'm not getting rid of my Xede. It works perfectly and I think it is the best piggyback on the market for applications up to 525whp/450wtq (dynojet). Fortunately, I am making more power than that and I need to address the limitations of the stock MAF in order reliably make more power.

I am looking to install a GM Maf on my Evo as I am at the absolute limit of the stock maf in terms of durability (see photo below), not to mention it metering limits. I don't want to spend a ton of money and I can get a MAF Translator for $199 and a GM Maf for less than $130.

Questions:
1. Couldn't I just install a GM MAF and a Maf Translator (or more expensive MAFT Pro) and "set it to zero" and just continue using my Xede to control fuel? Would there be wiring/signal conflicts?

2. Could you package together exactly what I would need to try this out?

3. When using MAFT Pro to convert to speed density, what is the largest size injector that you could run on an Evo?

If the Xede/MAF Translator works, it would be the most comprehensive OBDII compliant system that works for extremly high output Evos. I am aware of the possible problem of two many devices wired together (Trinababe ran into this issue and went to an AEM), but I am willing to try.

Photo of what happens to the stock MAF honeycomb at 539whp/491wtq:
__________________
584whp & 527wtq -- Stock ECU
3rd place 2008 Sport Compact Car's Ultimate Street Car Challenge
1st place Import Tuner Evo v Sti Shootout 2007 fastest lap & five lap challenge
2nd place Redline Time Attack mod class@Cal Speedway 2007

Tuned & Built by Tuning Tech -- AMS 2.3 stroker, Tuning Tech HTA35R Turbo kit -- Stock ECU -- stock head with HKS 272s -- AMS VSR intake manifold & MilSpec 65mm throttle body -- Gerrard Tuned Ohlin's Suspension -- Exedy Triple Carbon -- Nisei Comp Intercooler

Last edited by Smogrunner; Feb 20, 2006 at 12:30 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2006, 07:22 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
 
dryad001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Posts: 2,045

Drives: 03 VIII

Send a message via AIM to dryad001
Why don't you want to run a full speed density? Im figuring a blow-through type set-up will have the same ill effects. Granted the GM MAF is larger and more precise.

Not really sure on how the Xede works (coming from a UTEC background) and it seemed that the utec would have an anomole (sp?) of the maf hz readings and it got a little tricky to tune sometimes. When I installed the maftpro with the utec the hz reading were very linear.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2006, 07:36 PM   #3
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,560

Drives: 03 Evo VIII bought new, orignal owner

I'm keeping all my options open. If I go with this approach, I could get the maftpro I could do either the GM Maf or the speed density. If it all adds up to too much cash, it won't be worth it compared to the cost of full stand alone ecus.
__________________
584whp & 527wtq -- Stock ECU
3rd place 2008 Sport Compact Car's Ultimate Street Car Challenge
1st place Import Tuner Evo v Sti Shootout 2007 fastest lap & five lap challenge
2nd place Redline Time Attack mod class@Cal Speedway 2007

Tuned & Built by Tuning Tech -- AMS 2.3 stroker, Tuning Tech HTA35R Turbo kit -- Stock ECU -- stock head with HKS 272s -- AMS VSR intake manifold & MilSpec 65mm throttle body -- Gerrard Tuned Ohlin's Suspension -- Exedy Triple Carbon -- Nisei Comp Intercooler
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 04:19 AM   #4
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,102

you can just use your xede to control fuel and use maft to translate your biggie gm maf. all the stuff should be avail from ttp, or you can try to find a cheaper maf on ebay. you also need connectors which are avail on ebay.

i think the largest injector is a matter not of scaling but of how much idle tuning can be done. i'm not familiar with xede's idle tuning capabilities, but injector scaling is just an offset value from the stock setting, however you can't scale them too much, as injectors can't react infinitely fast... so in the case that you get such a problem... you just take out the fuel and have a mismatched injector scaling factor.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 04:38 AM   #5
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (9)
 
PeteyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,564

Drives: RX7 GSL-SE turbo, 05 MR Graphite Gray,02 GSXR-750, 88 supra turbo

Send a message via AIM to PeteyTurbo Send a message via Yahoo to PeteyTurbo
IMHO you are better off running speed density. At that airflow, a mass airflow sensor is like licking your finger and putting it to the wind!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 04:52 AM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
HiVoltEVO8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 108

Drives: EVO 8, 70-1/2 Camaro RS

Lightbulb

Smoggie,

Your cheapest alternative would probably be to look at an ECU+. It has almost the same features as XEDE. However, it also has the MAF translator included as a standard. You can run a GM 3" or 3.5" blow through set up. Mach V is the sole distributor. check it out at www.ecuplus.com
__________________
Once in awhile......Corporations give their best engineers carte blanche to take aluminum, steel, iron, rubber and glass to mold pure passion.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 04:59 AM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,102

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey Turbo
IMHO you are better off running speed density. At that airflow, a mass airflow sensor is like licking your finger and putting it to the wind!
is THAT why ls1 powered vettes make near 1000 or more hp on the stock maf?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 07:05 AM   #8
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison
Posts: 1,500

Drives: 2003 BBY Evo8, 2009 Outback

Send a message via AIM to PVD04
Quote:
Originally Posted by trinydex
is THAT why ls1 powered vettes make near 1000 or more hp on the stock maf?
I don't believe that peak power was the issue, but lack of airflow at idle. You can make a ton of power on the corvette MAF, but that doesn't mean you can make a 2.0 liter I-4 idle with aggressive cams with one.

-Paul
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 08:06 AM   #9
Silver Sponsor +1
Personal Sales Rating: (445)
 
TTP Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central FL
Posts: 8,317

Drives: 2008 Evolution GSR SSS, 2005 Evolution MR, 2003 Evo GSR, 1995 TsiAWD, 1995 GST, 1995 Tsi 2wd, 1991 GVR4 WW, 1991 GVR4 NBM, 1993 TsiAWD, 1991 Tsi, 1995 RS N20

Send a message via AIM to TTP Engineering
Questions:
1. Couldn't I just install a GM MAF and a Maf Translator (or more expensive MAFT Pro) and "set it to zero" and just continue using my Xede to control fuel? Would there be wiring/signal conflicts?
Yes, but it would be like buying an FQ-400 to put 87 in the tank for the daily gridlock commute. All those features go to waste. I have not looked at an X e d e wiring diagram, but it is likely they share some taps and inputs.

2. Could you package together exactly what I would need to try this out?
I can package anything you want.

3. When using MAFT Pro to convert to speed density, what is the largest size injector that you could run on an Evo?
Like trinadex stated, as long as you can get them trimmed enough to idle, you can use them. I would say 880-1000cc.

If the Xede/MAF Translator works, it would be the most comprehensive OBDII compliant system that works for extremly high output Evos. I am aware of the possible problem of two many devices wired together (Trinababe ran into this issue and went to an AEM), but I am willing to try.
I want to be politically correct here, but Trinababe's stuff was a mess. I saw no reason why the combination was not working. The questions being asked told me that the user was "lost". This is why you buy these units from us, you get the tech support, latest firmwares and help you need to get it running correct. Trinababe was impatient and removed it due to frustration and inadequate tech assistance. Trinababe bought it elsewhere.
__________________
2005 Evolution VIII MR
763whp/595tq HTA86
10.19 & 143.3mph stock ECU
Factory ECU Expert

2008 Evolution X GSR
12.0@113mph Full Wt+


In House Mustang Dyno AWD-500!
www.ttp-engineering.com


(407) 475-0010
AIM=TTPEngineering

MODIFYING THE 4G63 SINCE 1995, YES 14 YEARS!

TUNING EVO V - EVO X & 2009 RALLIART!

TTP's Myspace page!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 08:26 AM   #10
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,560

Drives: 03 Evo VIII bought new, orignal owner

Thank you very much for all of your input, especially T&TP. There are a combination of challenges to be overcome when trying to push 550 to 600whp and 525 to 550 wtq. For me, I need to make sure that the MAF I use can measure air accurately at these hp levels and I also need to make sure I can supply enough fuel. So, my two problems are very easily solvable. I already have about 1/2 half of AMS's 1200hp fuel system installed (injectors, fuel rail, fpr, upgraded fuel lines in the engine bay, Walbro 255 in the gas tank) and only need to add the second (external) Walbro. I also need a MAF that will not disintegrate (see photo of screen above) at super high hp levels. I am not completely counting out the full features of the MAFT Pro. I'm just taking one step at a time. I'll let you guys know how it goes and what direction I'm taking as soon as I know myself.
__________________
584whp & 527wtq -- Stock ECU
3rd place 2008 Sport Compact Car's Ultimate Street Car Challenge
1st place Import Tuner Evo v Sti Shootout 2007 fastest lap & five lap challenge
2nd place Redline Time Attack mod class@Cal Speedway 2007

Tuned & Built by Tuning Tech -- AMS 2.3 stroker, Tuning Tech HTA35R Turbo kit -- Stock ECU -- stock head with HKS 272s -- AMS VSR intake manifold & MilSpec 65mm throttle body -- Gerrard Tuned Ohlin's Suspension -- Exedy Triple Carbon -- Nisei Comp Intercooler
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2005, 30, airflow, evo, gm, gsl, install, layouts, maf, mass, mr, myspace, running, rx7, se, sensor, translator

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0