TunerPro RT software questions

DrEvo · Dec 11, 2005, 09:15 PM

TurboBob or Scott,

Just a few questions about the TunerPro RT software. In one of the other threads called "Screenshots", there is a snapshot of TurboBob showing the 3D pic of the VE table. I was looking at my VE table but its a tad different. I tried different settings here and there but no luck in getting it like Bobs example. One thing I did notice was that my version is 4.01 and Bob's is 4.12. Is this one of the differences between these two versions?

Also on the VE table, is there any way on version 4.01 to switch from "kpa" on the Y axis to "psi"? I read on another thread that you can do this if you right click on the table, but I wasn't getting anywhere with trying it that way. Here is a snapshot.

dryad001 · Dec 11, 2005, 09:20 PM

Use attachments to load a file.

My best guess is that the version Bob was using is for a different vechicle, there might be sligtly different variations to each select car.

I'll get backto you on the PSI to Kpa question, can't remember off the top of my head.

DrEvo · Dec 11, 2005, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dryad001

Use attachments to load a file.

My best guess is that the version Bob was using is for a different vechicle, there might be sligtly different variations to each select car.

I'll get backto you on the PSI to Kpa question, can't remember off the top of my head.

Yeah, just fixed it, its getting late.......... LOL! Thats a good possibility also, but if so, it would be a pain to keep different variations of software for each vehicle!!J
Here is a snapshot of my VE table'

DrEvo · Dec 12, 2005, 12:27 PM

Bob, Scott???.........

TTP Engineering · Dec 12, 2005, 02:44 PM

It is likely you won't need to modify that, but send me an email at sales@ttp-engineering.com so I can send you the most up to date file.

TurboBob · Dec 12, 2005, 05:36 PM

There is a more recent version of tunerpro with improved graphing functions. (4.12)

Its in final test and hasn't been officially released. If anyone wants to try it, I can send it to you.

The axis nomenclatures are just labels. They can be changed to PSI in the XDF file.

I can make a XDF file configured this way if you want.

Bob

TTP Engineering · Dec 12, 2005, 06:31 PM

We drive JDM derived Evo's but this is the USA, lets default that to Psi so everyone can understand it. This goes for the low/mid/hi set points too if possible. Thanks Bob.

TurboBob · Dec 12, 2005, 08:51 PM

for the low setpoint, - psi, or inches of vaccuum........

I'll work on it.

Bob

dryad001 · Dec 12, 2005, 09:22 PM

Send it to me Bob I need to fill my laptop up before the long haul drive to meet Scott and party like a rock star for 2.5 weeks. LOL

What are the changes? Just graphing?

dryad001us@yahoo.com is my e-mail

TurboBob · Dec 12, 2005, 10:13 PM

sent software,

Just graphing for now, more stuff coming soon.

Bob

DrEvo · Dec 12, 2005, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboBob

There is a more recent version of tunerpro with improved graphing functions. (4.12)

Its in final test and hasn't been officially released. If anyone wants to try it, I can send it to you.

The axis nomenclatures are just labels. They can be changed to PSI in the XDF file.

I can make a XDF file configured this way if you want.

Bob

Nice, I wouldn't mind beta testing it. I did notice that you can edit the tables in the .xdf file, but I wasn't sure if this was going to mess with any hardcoded variables/functions already programmed in the MAFT Pro unit. I went ahead and created an xdf file with the variables set to psi. I just converted the equivalent to psi from kpa, since I wasn't sure if it would effect the way the software or unit would function. Here is what I got.

DrEvo · Dec 12, 2005, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboBob

sent software,

Just graphing for now, more stuff coming soon.

Bob

Please send it to me also, jrmendoza11@gmail.com.....

Thanks

DrEvo · Dec 12, 2005, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboBob

for the low setpoint, - psi, or inches of vaccuum........

I'll work on it.

Bob

I would probably go with inches of vacuum since that is what most of the psi guages in the market use (please correct me if I am wrong). It would be easier to us since everyone is pretty much educated on this already. Keep it uniformed, it will relieve future headaches!!!

TurboBob · Dec 12, 2005, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrEvo

Nice, I wouldn't mind beta testing it. I did notice that you can edit the tables in the .xdf file, but I wasn't sure if this was going to mess with any hardcoded variables/functions already programmed in the MAFT Pro unit. I went ahead and created an xdf file with the variables set to psi. I just converted the equivalent to psi from kpa, since I wasn't sure if it would effect the way the software or unit would function. Here is what I got.

Looks fine. The labels don't affect the raw data, just how its displayed. In the case of the axis labels, the only effect is that the MAP tracing won't work since the axis labels are used to determine which cells to highlight to show the cells in use. If you want to use PSI, use - psi for the vaccuum region, so we can link the MAP tracing to the Boost pressure logging variable.

Anyway, the beta software is here:
http://www.bailey-eng.com/SetupTunerProRT_v412.exe

When you install it, there will be some new toolbars that are not used with the MAFT Pro. Just disable them with the view menu.

Bob

TTP Engineering · Dec 12, 2005, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrEvo

Nice, I wouldn't mind beta testing it. I did notice that you can edit the tables in the .xdf file, but I wasn't sure if this was going to mess with any hardcoded variables/functions already programmed in the MAFT Pro unit. I went ahead and created an xdf file with the variables set to psi. I just converted the equivalent to psi from kpa, since I wasn't sure if it would effect the way the software or unit would function. Here is what I got.

Your conversion is off. 14.5psi is listed x2.