evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Forums > Lancer (DE,ES,GTS) 2008+ Forums > Lancer (DE,ES,GTS) Tech Forums > Lancer Engine Tech
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 29, 2007, 12:01 AM   #31
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
thereasonsf3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 747

Drives: 2007 Subaru Impreza WRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj View Post
By my estimates, the CHP should be in the ballpark of 170 (going by the way we traditionally rate CHP). From what I've heard, they changed the ASA standards on how automakers can rate CHP; this has lead to lower numbers being listed.

An example being that WRXs have always been listed as 227 HP, yet despite Subaru upping the engine from 2L to 2.5L, it is now rated at 224 CHP. The car is most likely more powerful than before, it's just rated differently.
True cobb listed the 2.5L WRX at 250hp and 280tq.

And yes i think the 08 Lancer is highly underrated from the factory. I been checking out the 1/4 miles times for them and no way an 152hp engine can put up such consistent 1/4 times. Im with the majority of you guys i think the lancer has about 160+hp.
__________________
2007 Subaru Impreza WRX Stage 2 Protune

276whp 333wtq 93 pump gas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29, 2007, 11:19 AM   #32
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606

Drives: Boosted 08 Lancer GTS

Quote:
Originally Posted by madfast View Post
is that chart a baseline or after the piggy? one chart without the other is plain useless. we all know cars will get different ratings even on the same dyno.

possibly the lancer lent to evom was a bit more powerful like some press cars are known to be??? even with the new sae hp ratings 140 whp seemed quite high. especially when you consider that every review talks about how weak the engine is and i don't think a 140 whp car would feel that weak, cvt or not. now 123 whp is more inline with the factory hp rating and with what the reviews have been saying.
Thats what I'm saying.

Again I didn't want to post these numbers until I ran the car again. Its hard to compare my numbers against some Dynomite dyno (that noones has ever heard of) that is obviously as acurate as a G-Tech.

Again, I challenge ALL that think their stock Lancer is faster.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29, 2007, 04:35 PM   #33
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
bene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: g'boro
Posts: 499

Drives: 04 SRT-4

heatsoak?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 02:40 PM   #34
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606

Drives: Boosted 08 Lancer GTS

What?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 02:52 PM   #35
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
the_cosworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: YYC, Ab, Ca
Posts: 377

Drives: '08 Lancer ES MT

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeRious08 View Post
Thats what I'm saying.

Again I didn't want to post these numbers until I ran the car again. Its hard to compare my numbers against some Dynomite dyno (that noones has ever heard of) that is obviously as acurate as a G-Tech.

Again, I challenge ALL that think their stock Lancer is faster.
whats wrong with my g-tech I love that thing, it blinks and all
__________________
The Cos...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 03:08 PM   #36
EvoM Moderator
Personal Sales Rating: (88)
 
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,586

Drives: '04 Ford Explorer XLT, '69 Chevrolet Camaro, '97 Honda Civic LX (beater)

Please keep it on-topic, folks.

And please do not bash one dyno over another. Different dynos, different results. That doesn't mean that one is more accurate.

Personally, I'm having a hard time telling which runs are which on SeRious's dyno plot, so I won't comment on that. But everyone please remember that this thread is not meant to be a "my car vs. your car" or "my dyno vs. your dyno" competition. It is just meant to be a database of dyno runs on various cars and dynos so that future users have something to compare to.
__________________
Now playing (online):

PlayStation Network - blacksheepdj
Modern Warfare 2

Xbox Live - DJ zero 1980
Modern Warfare 2 - Not much else until I renew my Gold status
** If you have an extra 48-hour XBL code, I'd love to use it.**
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 04:35 PM   #37
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
show time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: INDY
Posts: 491

Drives: 2009 WW RA

OK there are a couple problems with the dyno comparisons. The dyno sheet that Blacksheep listed is from AtlanticMotorSport in Maryland and done on a stock Lancer. There is NO way in hell that you are losing 20+ WHP and TQ with a modded Lancer to a stock one. There dyno is a Dynomite and all of there pulls where done in 3rd gear. You arent suppose to do pulls in 4th gears so who ever you went to should have know that. There is no way you can compare these two sheets. Serios8 You need to take your ride to a better shop( Do a little research before you go next time) that has a tuner on hand. Have them hook to your piggy and show you a detailed list of what your a/f and spark are doing and if needed a slight tweak(No two cars are the same so a little tweak can do a lot) during the dyno pulls. The first Dyno sheet from AMS Maryland is dead on so there has to be improvement from that not decline.
__________________
RRM Pulley
__________________
Injen UICP
Cosworth drop-in
Until Fed EX gets here with my damn orders.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 04:51 PM   #38
EvoM Moderator
Personal Sales Rating: (88)
 
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,586

Drives: '04 Ford Explorer XLT, '69 Chevrolet Camaro, '97 Honda Civic LX (beater)

Quote:
Originally Posted by show time View Post
There is no way you can compare these two sheets.
...
The first Dyno sheet from AMS Maryland is dead on so there has to be improvement from that not decline.
First you say the correct thing (that they can't be compared).
Then you try to compare the two.

Can't have it both ways.
__________________
Now playing (online):

PlayStation Network - blacksheepdj
Modern Warfare 2

Xbox Live - DJ zero 1980
Modern Warfare 2 - Not much else until I renew my Gold status
** If you have an extra 48-hour XBL code, I'd love to use it.**
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 05:01 PM   #39
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
show time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: INDY
Posts: 491

Drives: 2009 WW RA

I meant on the next dyno sheet not that one he has now.
__________________
Injen UICP
Cosworth drop-in
Until Fed EX gets here with my damn orders.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 05:33 PM   #40
EvoM Moderator
Personal Sales Rating: (88)
 
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,586

Drives: '04 Ford Explorer XLT, '69 Chevrolet Camaro, '97 Honda Civic LX (beater)

But you mentioned comparing it to the AMS sheet (which is Ali's). That's my point.

The AMS sheet means nothing unless SeRious08 gets his car dynoed on a Dynomite dyno.
__________________
Now playing (online):

PlayStation Network - blacksheepdj
Modern Warfare 2

Xbox Live - DJ zero 1980
Modern Warfare 2 - Not much else until I renew my Gold status
** If you have an extra 48-hour XBL code, I'd love to use it.**
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 05:48 PM   #41
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606

Drives: Boosted 08 Lancer GTS

I'm trying to locate one.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 06:27 PM   #42
EvoM Moderator
Personal Sales Rating: (88)
 
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,586

Drives: '04 Ford Explorer XLT, '69 Chevrolet Camaro, '97 Honda Civic LX (beater)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeRious08 View Post
I'm trying to locate one.
That would be outstanding. It'd be quite interesting to see how tuning for your specific car/mods changes the numbers.
__________________
Now playing (online):

PlayStation Network - blacksheepdj
Modern Warfare 2

Xbox Live - DJ zero 1980
Modern Warfare 2 - Not much else until I renew my Gold status
** If you have an extra 48-hour XBL code, I'd love to use it.**
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 07:34 PM   #43
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 632

Drives: 09 WW Ralliart

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj View Post
But you mentioned comparing it to the AMS sheet (which is Ali's). That's my point.

The AMS sheet means nothing unless SeRious08 gets his car dynoed on a Dynomite dyno.
There is also nothing to compare unless he dynos the car with RRM parts and without RRM parts.

Those pulls he did could have been 30 HP over his car stock, but we will never know either way. What if he gets it done again and the HP is right at 145?

Without a before and after its always gonna be either "the dyno was wrong, I swear I can feel the power" or "OMG LOOK HOW AWESOME MY CAR IS!".

At this point Serious I hope when you have a shop do it the correct way, whatever that may be, you are happy with the results
__________________
Having the Christmas list in your sig is just like on the car. If you don't own the parts you show, it means you are a d**chebag ricer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Chef View Post
But I know the car really well and the suspension is setup JDM safely so it's really controllable.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2007, 08:56 PM   #44
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 85

Drives: 2008 lancer

Quote:
Originally Posted by show time View Post
There dyno is a Dynomite and all of there pulls where done in 3rd gear. You arent suppose to do pulls in 4th gears so who ever you went to should have know that.
The car should be dynoed in the gear that is closest to 1:1. It is not always 3rd gear, but in this car it probably is.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2007, 10:06 AM   #45
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606

Drives: Boosted 08 Lancer GTS

Quote:
Originally Posted by LancerGTS View Post
There is also nothing to compare unless he dynos the car with RRM parts and without RRM parts.

Without a before and after its always gonna be either "the dyno was wrong, I swear I can feel the power" or "OMG LOOK HOW AWESOME MY CAR IS!".
I was going to unplug the piggy on the last run to compare, but once the car was on the dyno there is no touching it. It was a special 3 pulls for $35 with no tech time. Once I find a decent dyno I will pay for 3 pulls and tech time.

I only did this as a base dyno.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
060, 08, 18, cai, dyno, dynojet, gts, injen, lancer, numbers, plot, pzev, research, sheet, stock

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0