evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Forums > Lancer (ES, LS, OZ) 2002-2007 Forums > Lancer (ES, LS, OZ) Tech Forums > Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 4, 2009, 05:26 AM   #256
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,486

Drives: IX MR SE

Send a message via AIM to TouringBubble
Do you have your maps rescaled to control fuel/timing at 125 load?

That sounds like you're hitting a point in the MAF scaling table where it flattens with increasing airflow. That would cause a rise in AFR if the map values were flat. If your fuel map is in the 10's, then you should be able to ramp it down after 5000 to prevent that lean shift.

No, don't increase fuel pressure above the stock setting. That is a rising rate regulator so it should be fine. To much pressure is bad as you get poor fuel atomization.
__________________
My Sponsor House Profile | EPM | AMSOIL | GTWorx

"We two souls have shared a cheese sandwich more than twice!"
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2009, 01:46 PM   #257
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
4g94T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,765

Drives: corn fed turbo lancer

yup my timing / fuel maps are rescaled to 130%

i made my MAF scaling similar to yours and that did the trick

because mine used to be a flat 255 from 800hz and above, but now that i changed it to where the value increases, it helped keep my AFR steady i understand now.
i still have some fine tuning to do though.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2009, 10:25 AM   #258
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (19)
 
sykou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,064

Drives: 2003 Lancer OZ Rally

so you guys got good results without rescaling the table to hertz? I thought 255 was the max you could go with the tables rescaled by the way...kinda confused here...
__________________
"Everything is LEGAL... As long as you don't get caught."
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2009, 11:10 AM   #259
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
4g94T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,765

Drives: corn fed turbo lancer

Rescaling it is just another way to view it in Hz instead.
It has no effect, it just helps for logging because it logs in Hz

Touringbubble, did you notice after upshifts during WOT it leans out?
Like from 2nd to 3rd
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2009, 08:00 AM   #260
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,486

Drives: IX MR SE

Send a message via AIM to TouringBubble
Quote:
Originally Posted by sykou View Post
so you guys got good results without rescaling the table to hertz? I thought 255 was the max you could go with the tables rescaled by the way...kinda confused here...
I'm using a different scaling. This was an odd ROM and had different scaling values. 255 is the max value (8-bit) if you take the scaling equation out of the picture.

Yes, I got the results I wanted with the tables I posted. Give it a shot.

4G, I haven't looked in to AFR on shifts as this was an auto car. I do have one 5 speed tune in the works but weather and travel has kept him from logging recently. I'll be sure to look in to it though.

If you are seeing odd occurences on shifts, you can adjust the fuel map in the load/RPM area where the shift takes place. You stay in open loop on a shift, so the changes to the MAF values will cause a shift there. You should be able to adjust the map to correct the issue pretty easily.
__________________
My Sponsor House Profile | EPM | AMSOIL | GTWorx

"We two souls have shared a cheese sandwich more than twice!"
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2009, 01:15 PM   #261
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
4g94T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,765

Drives: corn fed turbo lancer

Thanks TB for sharing your MAF scaling values

I wish someone could find the correct location for REV LIMIT in ECUflash, that would be awesome to be able to increase it
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 08:42 PM   #262
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Complink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 173

Drives: 03 Lancer OZ 16g

^+1 i agree
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2009, 08:49 PM   #263
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
OZ Rally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,350

Drives: a boostmobile

Send a message via AIM to OZ Rally
So any update on this? I seem to have similar issues too. I go a bit rich into boost then the car stumbles. After I let off the gas or shift the car stumbles again. In boost my wideband reads 11.0 AFR, idk if that's the max it reads or if that's what it really is. Right now I'm playing with maf size, scalings, fuel tables and ignition tables.
Some help please.
__________________
::CHI-BURBS MITSU::
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nubby View Post
If a good forum is like a good college party, then EvoM is at the point when the high school kids showed, drank all the beer, barfed on everything and now the keg is empty and there's no money for another one.
FS: Megan Manifold & Stock Parts
FS: Stock/Aftermarket Parts and Random Mitsu Merch
FS: Meth Kit
FS: All Stock Speakers
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 08:25 AM   #264
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,486

Drives: IX MR SE

Send a message via AIM to TouringBubble
11:1 should not be the max that the O2 reads, but if you have an Innovate product, you may want to verify the scaling using LM Programmer.

If you log airflow Hz in EvoScan, you should be able to use that data to dial in the MAF scaling table. Basically, as airflow (boost) rises, you'll need to increase the MAF scaling table in that Hz range to compensate for the extra fuel needed.

Increasing the MAF size value will also help, but it will increase your load level across the board. The issue with this is that it can cause drivability issues since the cruise load increases and you technically crush the WOT resolution in the maps. Increase this value only if needed.
__________________
My Sponsor House Profile | EPM | AMSOIL | GTWorx

"We two souls have shared a cheese sandwich more than twice!"
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
11v, afr, boost, boosting, car, change, ecuflash, evoscan, lancer, lean, line, map, octane, oz, vacuum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0