evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > EvoM Forums > Future Lancer & Evo Models
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 20, 2008, 01:10 PM   #1
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 128

Drives: Mirage

What's the next evolution

I'm hoping for use of Direct Injection. I know it's more costly but it offers both increased power and efficiency.

Weight reduction would be great as well.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2008, 05:04 PM   #2
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 13

Yeah weight reduction is a must!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2008, 08:39 PM   #3
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Blast83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 185

Drives: Evo IX SE

Yeah direct injection will probably be there. It used to be expensive as hell but not anymore. The Colbalt SS has it. After getting a measly 22.5mpg on a 300 mile road trip (stock), I think something needs to be done about gas millage. Extra power would be nice too. Help offset how much bloat they are making the Evo. Trying to turn a rally car into a entry level luxury car at mid level luxury price (over 40K for a MR /w navigation...I'd never get that or spend that much)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2008, 08:31 PM   #4
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Aar0nsite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Miami - Kendall, FL
Posts: 267

Drives: 2006 Evo IX Mr GG

Summary:
- Reduce Weight
- better MPG
- More Power
- and somehow LOWER THE INSURANCE ON THIS B*tCH!!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2008, 08:37 PM   #5
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Malik_EvoIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canton Michigan
Posts: 743

Drives: 2006 evo ix gsr Traded-> for 2009 Nissan Pathfinder SE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aar0nsite View Post
Summary:
- Reduce Weight
- better MPG
- More Power
- and somehow LOWER THE INSURANCE ON THIS B*tCH!!
people should stop crashing
__________________
-06 Evo IX Sold
-09 Pathfinder SE Journey Edition DD
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2008, 10:47 PM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Blast83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 185

Drives: Evo IX SE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malik_EvoIX View Post
people should stop crashing
Agree. Prick of a friend bought a new $42K BMW and he only pais like $350/6months for his insurance @ 25 while I'm paying $~650/6months and I have home insurance with my place. I have 0 accidents/tickets except for the $7K total accident from hitting a deer but I guess that doesn't effect rates. My sunfire was about $500/6months which is probably from every high school kid being able to afford a cavalier/sunfire.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2008, 07:31 PM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
hotrod2448's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Concord,NC
Posts: 2,700

Drives: E92 335, E65 750

I would like to see DI with high compression an increase in displacement and weight reduction. Then I would definitely be ready to get back in an Evo.

I do still miss the trunk and back seat space of the CT9A though.
__________________
Born to lose and destined to fail
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2008, 12:53 AM   #8
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Western_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 511

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blast83 View Post
Agree. Prick of a friend bought a new $42K BMW and he only pais like $350/6months for his insurance @ 25 while I'm paying $~650/6months and I have home insurance with my place. I have 0 accidents/tickets except for the $7K total accident from hitting a deer but I guess that doesn't effect rates. My sunfire was about $500/6months which is probably from every high school kid being able to afford a cavalier/sunfire.
How old are you
__________________
EVO X GSR--296whp/289TQ ( Work's flash+ tune& Blitz drop in F.)
----------------------------------------
Viper GTS-- 591rwhp /568ftlbTQ (Dynojet) All natural..
DC Performance
http://forums.evolutionm.net/other-c...ed-dyno-s.html
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 02:03 AM   #9
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
kiadaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore, England?
Posts: 144

Not trying to be a negative, but I highly doubt we have a much lighter (if at all) evo in future. Actually, I expect the future evos to gain more weight.

Improve power? Not sure, but I have a feeling that when Mit does, expect the price to have a jump, & price closer to European Marques.

I think direct injection & better fuel economy are realistic & likely possibilities.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 10:08 AM   #10
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
BerserkerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 217

Drives: Evo IX MR Silver

Don't expect the displacement to go up. Its a rally car and i doubt they will step it up above a 2.0, my question is why not have the Mivec control lift along with the timing? Wouldn't that be a lot better power and quicker spool??? Maybe I am wrong but I understand the current MIVEC setup on the X is only timing on ex. and in. Better than just timing on the IX but what about lift?!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 12:17 PM   #11
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
hotrod2448's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Concord,NC
Posts: 2,700

Drives: E92 335, E65 750

Quote:
Originally Posted by BerserkerX View Post
Don't expect the displacement to go up. Its a rally car and i doubt they will step it up above a 2.0, my question is why not have the Mivec control lift along with the timing? Wouldn't that be a lot better power and quicker spool??? Maybe I am wrong but I understand the current MIVEC setup on the X is only timing on ex. and in. Better than just timing on the IX but what about lift?!
With the Ralliart do they still need the Evo to be a 2.0? Some how the STI and WRX have managed to become 2.5L and still race. I know it's not an issue for WRC. I'm not sure of the Group N rules though.
__________________
Born to lose and destined to fail
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 05:13 PM   #12
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
BerserkerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 217

Drives: Evo IX MR Silver

I am pretty sure that they use the EJ20 in the STI when they rally. The STI in japan actually comes with the EJ20 which is the 2.0. I am not 100% sure on this but I was told that Subaru is dropping out of the WRC. They might do something like that for the Ralliart. Maybe they should do like a 2.2.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 08:22 PM   #13
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Blast83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 185

Drives: Evo IX SE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Western_man View Post
How old are you
25 why?

And yeah. The 2.0 Sti in Japan is supposed to be a better motor than the 2.5 here. I really don't know why they decided to go with a 2.5 here. Probably something to do with emissions and keeping the boost lower with larger displacement while creating 300hp.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 09:10 PM   #14
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
hotrod2448's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Concord,NC
Posts: 2,700

Drives: E92 335, E65 750

Quote:
Originally Posted by BerserkerX View Post
I am pretty sure that they use the EJ20 in the STI when they rally. The STI in japan actually comes with the EJ20 which is the 2.0. I am not 100% sure on this but I was told that Subaru is dropping out of the WRC. They might do something like that for the Ralliart. Maybe they should do like a 2.2.
I knew the STI stayed with the EJ20 in Japan. I also remember they changed the rules in WRC a while ago where they don't actually even have to build a homolagation road car like they used to. They still have to for group N I believe but I'm not sure what their engine specs are for that series. Also the WRC car was officially based on the lancer not the Evo starting with the WRC04. Mitsu actually dropped Evo from the name at that point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Lancer_WRC

Subaru is dropping out of WRC.

I'm just saying that since this engine was designed in conjunction with Dodge to be built up to a 2.4L I believe, they might as well take advantage of that. It's not like it costs any more to build a 2.4 over a 2.0 and with the added weight of the X the increased torque would be very useful.
__________________
Born to lose and destined to fail
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2009, 10:10 PM   #15
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
BerserkerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 217

Drives: Evo IX MR Silver

Yeah but then there are some people who like the smaller engines. I am one of those people that like the smaller ones. Its either the low end torque from the bigger engines or the faster and higher revvs of the smaller engines. Didn't mitsu use the lancia when they first started to rally?? Lol off subject but just curious about it.

So back on subject besides direct injection, full MIVEC, and a bigger engine; what other things do people think should be put on the car. Can we expect maybe the car to not be running so rich from the factory? lol
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
difference, gsr, mr

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0