 |
|
Jul 20, 2007, 04:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 201
Drives: 05' Evo MR
|
evo x dyno sheet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKuV3HLtX10
video has sheet.
here is the conversion 
206 KW == 276.25055
422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
__________________
Silver 05 EVO 8 MR
AMS FMIC, AMS TBE, AMS LICP, CAI, Walbro 255 FP, Exedy Twin Plate HD Clutch, NGK BPR7es Plugs, Endura-Tech CT9A F=8k - R=9k Coilovers, AEM Tru Boost, Lower Engine Mount, WedsSport as70 17x9, SS Break Lines, SS Clutch Line, ARP Head Studs, GSC S1 cams, 245 40 Hoosier A6 on 17x8.5 RPF1, Stock 24mm SB (F), 23mm Cusco SB(R), AEM A/R, AMS shifter bushings, BeatRush Tray
AMS tuned (93oct) 318 AWHP & 302 TQ
AMS tuned (100oct) 366 AWHP & 382 TQ
New 2010 GTR pre
Last edited by rio-evo; Jul 20, 2007 at 04:52 PM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Drives: 04 evo rs
|
how are you so sure thats not to the wheels
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 396
Drives: 07 OBP STI, 03 WRB WRX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rio-evo
|
I made some comments on the video HERE.
I am disappointed in the low HP number, but really, Torque is where the fun is at. And 311 stock is very good.
I also noted that I belive 276hp is the magic number that the japanese auto manufacturers agreed upon. So it may very well be underrated. Frankly, I'm much more interested in the torque figure and I'm rather happy about it.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:37 PM
|
#4
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 335
Drives: 2002 Powerstroke Diesel/ Evolution VIII
|
if torque was where thee fun is @ i would have a diesel truck with most new diesels having over 400 ftlbs.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 35
Drives: X
|
yea but the trucks weight is way more the an evo so you couldnt feel the fun
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:43 PM
|
#6
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 396
Drives: 07 OBP STI, 03 WRB WRX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jroller
if torque was where thee fun is @ i would have a diesel truck with most new diesels having over 400 ftlbs.
|
Why do you think VWs are liked so much? The low-end torque to the wheels makes them feel really sporty. Trust me, low-end grunt + AWD = perma- 
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 05:57 PM
|
#7
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VANCOUVER BC
Posts: 1,612
Drives: Evolution X MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco-REX
Why do you think VWs are liked so much? The low-end torque to the wheels makes them feel really sporty. Trust me, low-end grunt + AWD = perma- |
Don't care much for high speed. Low end torque is where you can have fun! if those numbers are WHP, then that is a lot of torque! 
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 06:01 PM
|
#8
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 396
Drives: 07 OBP STI, 03 WRB WRX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackygor
Don't care much for high speed. Low end torque is where you can have fun! if those numbers are WHP, then that is a lot of torque! |
Even if it's at the flywheel, it's a step up from the IX.
But we dont' know what the X weighs, and there's no hint in the video.
I'm still betting on 3350 base for the regular trimline. If that red is indeed a stripped-down X, I could see it at the MR's 3285.
These days are interesting times!
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 06:02 PM
|
#9
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 201
Drives: 05' Evo MR
|
I agree, I do like the torque number on a stock evo.
The HP number is week as hell!!
We can only hope the final version will be over 300 hp.
__________________
Silver 05 EVO 8 MR
AMS FMIC, AMS TBE, AMS LICP, CAI, Walbro 255 FP, Exedy Twin Plate HD Clutch, NGK BPR7es Plugs, Endura-Tech CT9A F=8k - R=9k Coilovers, AEM Tru Boost, Lower Engine Mount, WedsSport as70 17x9, SS Break Lines, SS Clutch Line, ARP Head Studs, GSC S1 cams, 245 40 Hoosier A6 on 17x8.5 RPF1, Stock 24mm SB (F), 23mm Cusco SB(R), AEM A/R, AMS shifter bushings, BeatRush Tray
AMS tuned (93oct) 318 AWHP & 302 TQ
AMS tuned (100oct) 366 AWHP & 382 TQ
New 2010 GTR pre
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 06:08 PM
|
#10
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 702
Drives: The 1st Evo 8 in o'side
|
okay thats it i'm throwing in the towel and trading my 03 for the X. Damn it all to HELL!
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 06:20 PM
|
#11
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 129
Drives: X Coming Soon!
|
Damn they are definetly trying to be the Audi of japan w/ the whole styling and performance of the car
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 07:52 PM
|
#12
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Drives: 04 evo rs
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by advancEvo27
Damn they are definetly trying to be the Audi of japan w/ the whole styling and performance of the car
|
And this pertains to the X dyno sheet? i think not 
im not hating on you but just letting you know there are plenty of i hate evo X threads lets not make every thread one now.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 07:57 PM
|
#13
|
|
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: ( 33)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 5,115
Drives: Evo IX MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco-REX
...
I also noted that I belive 276hp is the magic number that the japanese auto manufacturers agreed upon. So it may very well be underrated. Frankly, I'm much more interested in the torque figure and I'm rather happy about it.
|
Rather than underrated, its probably detuned. Its making great peak torque values, and the HP curve seems to have a very flat top suggesting that they are simply pulling back boost to keep the HP within the 276 HP value agreed upon for JDM vehicles. 300+ HP could be as easy as a tune.
The question that wont be answered for a while is whether the new motor can handle big HP, e.g. 400 whp+.
__________________
Amsoil cone filter :: cardboard cold air box :: AMS LICP :: MIL.SPEC TB seals :: English Racing ported EM and HS :: Titek v2 O2 :: Helix v2 DP :: MIL.SPEC 100 cps cat :: RRE Stealth Stainless :: Walbro :: Wilson fuel rail :: FIC Bosch 1100s :: E85 :: GM BCS :: SpoolinUp COP :: self-tuned :: VDR 5.71, 340wtq/380whp MD mode, 375wtq/418 whp DJ mode, 40°F
Donations always appreciated. Use "wassana at toloczko dot com".
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 20, 2007, 10:21 PM
|
#14
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 695
Drives: 2010 PB Evo X MR Touring
|
the "official" hp number is obviously underrated. besides the fact that every japanese sports car being rated at 276 hp is fishy, the 4b11 has less stroke than the 4g63 yet makes 311 ft lbs vs 289 for the 4g63. whatever is making more tq will also make more hp especially given that displacement is basically the same and that the stroke is actually DECREASED and the redline is 7000.
this video makes the engine look very promising.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Jul 21, 2007, 01:35 AM
|
#15
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 45)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,484
Drives: '05 apex silver evo 8
|
dual exhaust is gay though...you have to agree w/ that...
__________________
Ported IX Turbo/Buddy Club 272/280/Magnus Street SMIM/J Speed manifold/QTP O2 dump/ETS Short Route UICP/LICP/4" MAFless intake/ETS 3.5" Exhaust/ETS 3" widetank fmic/Walbro 255/ACT HD/Speed Density on stock ECU
MidgetSpec & EnglishRacing = 380 awhp
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| | 
|
