 |
Jun 30, 2009, 08:17 PM
|
#1
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 143
Drives: Evo X
|
WIDTH: 275 NT05 v. 265 Star Spec
First off, I know per Nitto's and Dunlop's specs a 275 NT05 is 0.09" wider than a 265 Star Spec.
I'm really looking for 1st hand experience with this comparison. Who's had both and can compare the width of the two?
|
|
Offline
|
|
Jun 30, 2009, 08:21 PM
|
#2
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 5)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,299
Drives: 00 Eclipse GT SDS Stg. 3 & 08 RR EVO X GSR
|
Go with 265 for street driving, more than enough tire for street driving, especially with AWD, car will handle far more predictably.
However, a 275/35/18 will be close to the stock size, interms of speedometer accuracy.
__________________
List:
-CBRD Tune -COBB AP -COBB UICP, LICP, BOV HP -COBB SFI -COBB Turbo Inlet Pipe -COBB Sway Bars -ETS 4" FMIC -AMS DP -T1R Exhaust -MXP TP -FORGE WGA -xMR Catch Cans -AMS Front Rollerstop -AMS Fuel Rail -evoDynamics 3 Port -Deatschwerks 800cc -Techna-Fit SS Lines -TWM Short Shifter -WORKS Bushings -SWIFT Sport-Mach's -Whiteline Kit -AEM UEGO -STRI PSI Gauge -Rally Armor Mudflaps -PERRIN 3" Ant.
Future:
ROTA Torque
CBRD BBK Turbo
Cosworth MX1
SteepSpeed Exhaust Manifold
|
|
Offline
|
|
Jun 30, 2009, 09:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 120
Drives: 2008 PB EVO X GSR w/SSS
|
I'm not sure if I want 275 or 265 with mine. I might just go crazy and stick with 275
Last edited by chuynh207; Jul 1, 2009 at 11:45 AM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Jun 30, 2009, 11:49 PM
|
#4
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 143
Drives: Evo X
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipse3GT
Go with 265 for street driving, more than enough tire for street driving, especially with AWD, car will handle far more predictably.
However, a 275/35/18 will be close to the stock size, interms of speedometer accuracy.
|
I understand the arguments for/against the 265 v. 275. However, lots of people around here run a 265 star spec, and if a 275 NT05 is the same width, what difference does it make?
I'm really asking since I have the availability to obtain a set of 275 NT05s right away, but I'm trying to avoid rubbing. I've been waiting on a set of 265's. I'm on swift springs (0.6" rear drop) w/ 1.2* of camber. Wheels are 18x9.5 +20. People have pulled this off w/ a 265 Star Spec, so that's the nature of my question.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Jul 1, 2009, 12:00 AM
|
#5
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 251
Drives: 08 Evo X Apex Silver
|
I'm on swifts with same rims/offset and 265 RE01Rs and I rub. I even have 2 degrees of camber in the rear. I rolled the fenders slightly and that solved the rubbing. I'm guessing you'll rub with either tire.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Jul 1, 2009, 10:10 AM
|
#6
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 143
Drives: Evo X
|
Would you happen to know the measured width of the re01r's in that size?
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
Tags
|
05, 265, 275, difference, direzza, for, nt, nt05, size, spec, star, start, tires, wider, width  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|