evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution X Forums > Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 7, 2009, 05:35 PM   #16
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 238

Cast iron > aluminum for boost anyway... why would you want to swap out one of the best 4 cycle engines ever? It would be like taking out a supra motor and putting in a an aluminum bmw inline 6. Its just a down grade lol.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2009, 05:45 PM   #17
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
skyblas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MS/SG...now in perth
Posts: 479

Drives: jdm civic 07, mazda astina 96, toyota prado 97, nissan grand livina 09...soon to be evo

i also have this in mind
how would it feel with the 4B11 engine in an evo 9
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2009, 06:03 PM   #18
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Im in Reno trick.
Posts: 364

does anyone know how much lighter the 4b11t is compaired to the 4g63..... Id bet if its significantly lighter the evo9 with a 4b11t would have better weight distribution.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2009, 06:20 PM   #19
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 238

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboytb View Post
does anyone know how much lighter the 4b11t is compaired to the 4g63..... Id bet if its significantly lighter the evo9 with a 4b11t would have better weight distribution.
Its a decent amount lighter i would think. But If your going to do a swap thats going to take alot of fabing to make it work why use a 4b11t? Put in a supra motor or try and cram in a ls1/ls7. that would be worth all that time and work.

All your going to get by putting in a 4b11t is a motor that wont make as much power as your original motor. Yeah it will be lighter but you could just take out your spare jack and back seats and it would be close. I would rather take out my spare and jack and seats alot less work .
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2009, 06:31 PM   #20
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Im in Reno trick.
Posts: 364

weight distribution is key on the track (road course) the evo9 is a little front heavy a lighter moter would help that out.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2009, 10:11 PM   #21
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southbay
Posts: 11

Drives: E36 BMW, 64 VW bug, 68 Baja with EvoX motor, 67 5/1600

The 4b11t is 27 pounds lighter. the fab work involved would add weight yes, but you also need to cut out the mounts and what not for the stock motor so you would be close.

it would just be fun id say. but what are you talking about less power? stock for stock the 4b has better numbers. now yea for sure there's an infinite amount of mods for the 4g but in time the 4b is going to ave the same...though your right about the cast vs aluminum..but i dont think he will be boosting 35 PSI...

I got a 4b complete id be willing to trade for! lol i dont want to deal with the harness on it...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 08:43 AM   #22
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 238

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvoBaja View Post
The 4b11t is 27 pounds lighter. the fab work involved would add weight yes, but you also need to cut out the mounts and what not for the stock motor so you would be close.

it would just be fun id say. but what are you talking about less power? stock for stock the 4b has better numbers. now yea for sure there's an infinite amount of mods for the 4g but in time the 4b is going to ave the same...though your right about the cast vs aluminum..but i dont think he will be boosting 35 PSI...

I got a 4b complete id be willing to trade for! lol i dont want to deal with the harness on it...
By less power i should of said less power potential. the 4g63 is one of the few 4 cylinders to go over 1100 to the wheels. Until the 4b11t hits that number it's a down grade. And a 27lb weight difference wouldn't even be noticeable.

And again with all the fab work that would need to be done why not put in a ls1 or supra motor? that would be a real upgrade .
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 08:59 AM   #23
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
evox44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto
Posts: 68

4B11T has proven togo over 750whp with a moderate size of mod lists, 1100whp will not be too far. HP can be gained easier with the 4B11T, with the weight of an evo IX and power of a X it would be great, thats if the costs for these are low, otherwise it may be cheaper to mod your IX furthur or get an X.
__________________
FS: HKS Legamax
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 06:33 PM   #24
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Phantom X Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saint Marys, Georgia
Posts: 44

Drives: 2010 PB Evo X GSR sss

Sounds interesting, but all that work for only 27lbs savings seems like too much for my tastes.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 08:02 PM   #25
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 67

Drives: 2006 Yamaha R6, 2008 Evo MR, 2007 Twin Turbo Z06

:P I may be a bit one sided but I would say put a LS7 in and twin turbo it ... Im running 10psi on my TT LS7 and its making a bit over 800hp :P and almost 500lbs/tq @3,500rpm at the wheel ahah now imagine that in a Evo.. Although my Z06 is only 3,200lbs...

Last edited by Freebs; Nov 8, 2009 at 08:05 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 08:42 PM   #26
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bogota
Posts: 44

Drives: evo 9 gsr,2008 vw jetta gli

nice proyect , that engine revs anad maintain torque nicely , and in low weight evo 9 could be a monster car, but as my view you may have to deal with room space on the tunnel to pass the exhaust is gonna be a little difficult (between the transfer and the tunnel) also the heat on the rear may have some issues with acd pump.

good luck
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2009, 08:44 PM   #27
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bogota
Posts: 44

Drives: evo 9 gsr,2008 vw jetta gli

suscribed
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2009, 12:22 AM   #28
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 30

Drives: 95 Talon TSi,06 EVO IX,04 350Z TT

Lightbulb Evo

I don't think is worth the hassle.Just get a Evo X.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2009, 04:25 PM   #29
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
dongchad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SoCalifornia
Posts: 106

Drives: O B evoX gsr

if you have it, just do it!
and let us know how it goes.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 11:03 PM   #30
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Schaumburg
Posts: 7

Drives: 2003 STi Spec C

i think the motor be more efficient in the car, not on it.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
4b11, 4b11t, acd, drive, evo, gt2835, potential, pump, swap, trian, turbo

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0