evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution X Forums > Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 5, 2009, 12:09 PM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Talon_66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 745

Drives: WW EVO X

Wideband issue/troubles

Ok, so Im ready to kick a small child right now.

I got my new o2 bung welded up today at a muffler shop. They screwed up, and said they had to stack another bung on the first one creating a spacer of sorts.

How badly would this screw up my wideband readings. My idle is the same, cruising is off by a bit. But under partial throttle (while boosting low PSI) Im seeing 12.3-13afr. I know this could be due to the fact I just installed an o2 housing/dp combo. But I want to know how badly a spacer could affect my wideband reading. Im guessing this spacer has me about 1/4 farther out, then just 1 nut.
__________________
WW EVO X #32

ECUTek Tune (318whp/359 Torque @ 26psi)
Tuned by Cam @ Lightspeed Innovations

First EVO X in Canada to Break 300whp
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 08:40 AM   #2
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
smoke4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 72

Drives: 2008 Evo X GSR

I was just looking into getting a wideband done and I think it was AMS that sells a spacer to use. The spacer is for eliminating the CEL that can come with putting an aftermarket exhaust on. Im not sure if it was for the wideband o2 you put on downpipe or the sensor on cat pipe. Maybe they put an extra bung on to create a spacer for that reason?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 09:00 AM   #3
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
sbdemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 114

Drives: 2008 Lancer Evo X GSR, 2008 Toyota Tundra SR5

It's not for a wideband O2 sensor ... it's purpose is to space out the O2 sensor that goes after your cat/test pipe, moving it out of the path of the exhaust gases so it tricks the ecu into believing you are getting a "normal" reading. This prevents the ECU from throwing a CEL. You want the wideband sensor to have an accurate reading so using a spacer to move it out of the direct exhaust flow seems like it will give you a false/altered reading and be of little benefit.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 10:13 AM   #4
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
droppinbottom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 83

Drives: 08 Evo X GSR, 90 Tsi Awd

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbdemon View Post
It's not for a wideband O2 A ... it's purpose is to space out the O2 sensor that goes after your cat/test pipe, moving it out of the path of the exhaust gases so it tricks the ecu into believing you are getting a "normal" reading. This prevents the ECU from throwing a CEL. You want the wideband sensor to have an accurate reading so using a spacer to move it out of the direct exhaust flow seems like it will give you a false/altered reading and be of little benefit.
Thats the truth. I would not allow them to use a spacer on mine and also make sure they have to air leaks around it. I have seen shops weld a bung on a exhaust while it is still on the vehicle and not be able to get a good bead around the top part of the bung and it will pull air from that point. From what I have seen in that case is that the idle/low throttle a/f is off but the wot runs will be ok but it can leave you guessing alot.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 10:32 AM   #5
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
houdini_678's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 93

Drives: 2.3L Evo IX

If it's an AEM wideband or any other brand, i think a good call is to contact manufacturer since they are the ones who built the sensor to specifics, and a picture sent to them might help to on clarifying your doubts, should they find any issues with this work... Good Luck.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 01:59 PM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
sbdemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 114

Drives: 2008 Lancer Evo X GSR, 2008 Toyota Tundra SR5

This is from Innovate Motorsports (most brands use the same Bosch sensor)

Sensor Placement. The sensor bung (or boss) should be at least 8" away from the combustion cylinder (at or after the collector if you have one, unless you're installing a sensor for each cylinder). To avoid condensation running into the sensor, it should be installed at the side or on top, NOT on the bottom of the exhaust pipe, for example between the 10:00 and 2:00 position. If you don't have a bung, any muffler shop can weld one in for you. If you have a catalytic converter, install the sensor before it. If you have a turbo, install the sensor AFTER it. Extended bungs. For high performance and power sports applications, we strongly recommend using 1" bungs (p/n 3764.) These longer bungs increase sensor life in the "richer" conditions encountered under boost, leaded fuel use, or two-stroke applications
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2009, 07:50 PM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Talon_66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 745

Drives: WW EVO X

Whoa, this problem was solved the day after I post. Good reaction time.
__________________
WW EVO X #32

ECUTek Tune (318whp/359 Torque @ 26psi)
Tuned by Cam @ Lightspeed Innovations

First EVO X in Canada to Break 300whp
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2009, 12:52 PM   #8
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
300zxsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 41

Drives: 90 300zxtt, 08 evo X

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talon_66 View Post
Whoa, this problem was solved the day after I post. Good reaction time.
Man you should know how forums are. One person brings it back and then everyone thinks its a new thread.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2009, 01:25 PM   #9
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Talon_66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 745

Drives: WW EVO X

Quote:
Originally Posted by 300zxsteve View Post
Man you should know how forums are. One person brings it back and then everyone thinks its a new thread.
Hahaha for sure.
__________________
WW EVO X #32

ECUTek Tune (318whp/359 Torque @ 26psi)
Tuned by Cam @ Lightspeed Innovations

First EVO X in Canada to Break 300whp
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2009, 02:23 PM   #10
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
journeymansteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St Louis
Posts: 235

Drives: my Evo X GSR with as little brakes as I can...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talon_66 View Post
....I know this could be due to the fact I just installed an o2 housing/dp combo. ....
Hey Talon, so I've read a bit from you in the past year modding yours and saw an earlier posting with some anxiety about the O2/DP combo being too free flowing perhaps. I just got my own UR installed and their high flow CC also, mated up to the ETS duals.

Is the kick in the pants I feel normal?! I mean, WOW, I knew it would be louder under load and all, but I didn't expect the HP gain so easily. I've not tuned mine yet, so just curious how the full TB feels to you since you took this on more gradually than me.

Oh, what's your mileage? Out of warranty from that yet? The dudes at my DSM shop told me TB would void my warranty. I'm over 1/2 way there, and figured they'd give me grief over any claims anyway. Such as the one I found behind the manifold heat shield showing my O2 Housing and downpipe had a small leak. I figured that would be a no-win argument, not to mention my explaining why I had the shield off in the first place.
__________________
- Perrin "Shorty" 2in antenna
- ETS Dual cat back V1 exhaust w/ 3" ETS merge pipe
- UR O2/downpipe
- UR high-flow Cat (metal)
- K&N drop-in air filter
- Dunlop Starspec Z1 - RIP
- crappy Yoko W4S 'Snow tire' A/S (scare-me tires)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0