 |
|
Feb 5, 2009, 10:36 AM
|
#16
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,965
Drives: 05 Evo8 SSL
|
Fantastic!
|
|
Online
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 01:11 PM
|
#17
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Posts: 478
Drives: 08 GG Evo X
|
I have a Cobb intake so someof that may be different for others but it will get you close !
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 01:35 PM
|
#18
|
|
NTEC Club Forum Leader
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,501
Drives: RR EvoX
|
5.904*7000/1200 = 34% IDC? That's hella low. or am I off in what you're showing us?
__________________
Are you in the North Texas area? Check out NTEC!
mmmm corn
|
|
Online
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 01:52 PM
|
#19
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 56
Drives: Evo X
|
Any chance this can help with the "fuel dilution in oil problem"?
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 02:10 PM
|
#20
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Posts: 478
Drives: 08 GG Evo X
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nala
Any chance this can help with the "fuel dilution in oil problem"?
|
That is from the overly rich factory tune
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 02:14 PM
|
#21
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 513
Drives: 2006 Mitsubishi Evolution IX MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofygrin
5.904*7000/1200 = 34% IDC? That's hella low. or am I off in what you're showing us?
|
you are off. you are using the voltage which is wrong. should be the ipw at that rpm.
__________________
-buschur tbe with test pipe
-buschur SS O2 housing
-buschur ported exhaust manifold
-nisei competion fmic plus piping kit
-nisei mini battery
-Walbro 255 Fuel Pump
-FIC Bluemax
-GM 3-Port
-aem air filter
-self tuned with EcuFlash & Zeitronix
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 02:14 PM
|
#22
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 56
Drives: Evo X
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HB Speed
That is from the overly rich factory tune
|
I certainly hope that that proves to be the case. But based on the other long thread on the fuel dilution issue, it seems that the few people with custom tunes that have had their oil analyzed are reporting the same high levels of fuel dilution...
I'm looking for anything that can help!
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 02:53 PM
|
#23
|
|
NTEC Club Forum Leader
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,501
Drives: RR EvoX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewzaragoza
you are off. you are using the voltage which is wrong. should be the ipw at that rpm.
|
Right... the display he showed had V on the left and something in ms on the right. I figured it was ipw in ms... (figured wrong?)
__________________
Are you in the North Texas area? Check out NTEC!
mmmm corn
|
|
Online
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 04:08 PM
|
#24
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 10)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 273
Drives: On the mustang dyno
|
Nice. They look so much like the Subaru injectors.
I hope someone post a decent injector latency values. Its kinda time consuming when you have to reflash each setting to find out which one works best.
I will have to give these a try.
__________________
---Will have new numbers soon----
08 Evo X FPRED
03 Evo VIII FPgreen (street), GT42r(Drag), soon to try 6262 to both street and drag.
Times
12.0 2005
11.4 2008
10.8 2009
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 04:44 PM
|
#25
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kanagawa, Japan
Posts: 760
Drives: Lancer Evo X GSR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by awddyno
I hope someone post a decent injector latency values. Its kinda time consuming when you have to reflash each setting to find out which one works best.
|
Look at the post above by HB Speed, he posted the scaling & latency info.
Thanks HB Speed 
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 08:14 PM
|
#26
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 488
Drives: 2008 EVO X
|
I can not wait to get some of these and a turbo.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 10:18 PM
|
#27
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 10)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 273
Drives: On the mustang dyno
|
latency
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiC
Look at the post above by HB Speed, he posted the scaling & latency info.
Thanks HB Speed |
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
__________________
---Will have new numbers soon----
08 Evo X FPRED
03 Evo VIII FPgreen (street), GT42r(Drag), soon to try 6262 to both street and drag.
Times
12.0 2005
11.4 2008
10.8 2009
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 10:26 PM
|
#28
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kanagawa, Japan
Posts: 760
Drives: Lancer Evo X GSR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by awddyno
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
|
I thought the Cobb intake doesn't change the MAF housing (just a cone filter) so MAF scaling shouldn't be needed. With the cone filter the AFR may be slightly leaner but most people adjust that thru the fuel maps and not with injector scaling. So even if he dialed these injectors in with the Cobb intake, there should be a minimal difference when using a stock intake.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 10:26 PM
|
#29
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Posts: 478
Drives: 08 GG Evo X
|
Actually I loaded the stock maps with my scaling and injector latency and it was almost identical to my pre inj mapping all you should have to do is adjust fuel table to get wot right
Or a slight adjustment of latency or scalar if your intake is waaAy ofF
Quote:
Originally Posted by awddyno
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
|
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009, 10:30 PM
|
#30
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 10)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 273
Drives: On the mustang dyno
|
I will try it when I get the injectors.
__________________
---Will have new numbers soon----
08 Evo X FPRED
03 Evo VIII FPgreen (street), GT42r(Drag), soon to try 6262 to both street and drag.
Times
12.0 2005
11.4 2008
10.8 2009
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
800cc, cc, deatsch, dynamics, evo, factory, fuel, injecters, injector, injectors, modified, oem, orange, stock, work, works  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| | 
|
