Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

3.5" Maf Scaling Table??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2011, 05:40 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Huge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.5" Maf Scaling Table??

I’m hoping some one here can give me a hand or a jump start with the maf scaling tables. I’m going to use a 3.5” maf housing that measures exactly 86mm ID. I measured the stock maf housing and I got 65mm ID. The new maf housing is roughly 31% larger. But from the treads I’ve been reading I think 31% increase to the table will be too much.
Anyone that doesn’t mind sharing there maf scaling tables for a 3.5” maf please post them.
Old May 15, 2011, 06:14 AM
  #2  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
1) use stock MAF
2) get trims and WOT afr logged
3) swap to 3.5" MAF, start with 1.4 multiplier
4) log trims and WOT AFR adjust scaling and smooth until you trims and WOT AFR match in step 2.
Old May 15, 2011, 01:51 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,222
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It really is that simple, worst case you want to overshoot a bit so it is on the rich side, then work your way back down leaner again to tweak it.

For reference I went with a 1.35 multiplier (35%) and trims are pretty close to what I had. Select the entries you want to change and choose "Multiply Data" under the edit menu and enter in the multiplier you want to use. I like to go to the View menu and do a "view graph" to verify they changed properly, the curve should be pretty much the same as before.
Old May 15, 2011, 04:33 PM
  #4  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
I had a little trouble finding these too, just happen to have them open so I'll share

evo10base.xml
Code:
    <scaling name="MAFVoltScaling" units="units" toexpr="x*5/1024" frexpr="x*1024/5" format="%.3f" min="0" max="5" inc="1" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>

    <table name="MAF Compensation" category="Fuel" type="2D" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="40" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #2" category="Fuel" type="2D" level="1" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="40" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #3" category="Fuel" type="2D" level="1" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="50" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>
52680015.xml
Code:
    <table name="MAF Compensation" address="5753a">
        <table name="X" address="615ea"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #2" address="5758a">
        <table name="X" address="6163a"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #3" address="575da">
        <table name="X" address="6168a"/>
    </table>
I settled on 1.39*stock values after starting at 1.48 (extra safe).

I'd just start at 1.4* just like tephra said. If you do the math, it works out:

area of circle: pi*r*r
inner diameter(stock): 2.8" (r=1.4)
inner diameter(primo): 3.3" (r=1.65)

area (stock) = 1.4*1.4*3.14 = 6.15 sq inches
area (primo) = 1.65*1.65*3.14 = 8.55 sq inches

conversion ratio (primo/stock): 8.55/6.15= 1.39

It is amazing how nicely the car runs on a maf this huge!
Old May 15, 2011, 07:31 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Huge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the help guys will try this tomorrow after work. Will post results or if i hav e any questions.
Old May 16, 2011, 08:12 AM
  #6  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
tonyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scheides
I had a little trouble finding these too, just happen to have them open so I'll share

evo10base.xml
Code:
    <scaling name="MAFVoltScaling" units="units" toexpr="x*5/1024" frexpr="x*1024/5" format="%.3f" min="0" max="5" inc="1" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>

    <table name="MAF Compensation" category="Fuel" type="2D" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="40" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #2" category="Fuel" type="2D" level="1" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="40" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #3" category="Fuel" type="2D" level="1" scaling="AirFlow16">
        <table name="X" type="X Axis" elements="50" scaling="MAFVoltScaling"/>
    </table>
52680015.xml
Code:
    <table name="MAF Compensation" address="5753a">
        <table name="X" address="615ea"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #2" address="5758a">
        <table name="X" address="6163a"/>
    </table>

    <table name="MAF Compensation #3" address="575da">
        <table name="X" address="6168a"/>
    </table>
I settled on 1.39*stock values after starting at 1.48 (extra safe).

I'd just start at 1.4* just like tephra said. If you do the math, it works out:

area of circle: pi*r*r
inner diameter(stock): 2.8" (r=1.4)
inner diameter(primo): 3.3" (r=1.65)

area (stock) = 1.4*1.4*3.14 = 6.15 sq inches
area (primo) = 1.65*1.65*3.14 = 8.55 sq inches

conversion ratio (primo/stock): 8.55/6.15= 1.39

It is amazing how nicely the car runs on a maf this huge!
how are your trims after this? i mean the 1.39 thing..i'm planning to put back in aem's bigger maf housing..i'm just getting all the info first before proceeding.
Old May 16, 2011, 02:42 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
 
YaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, I used 1.4 multiplier for 3.5 inch maf, the trims are within 1.5-2%, but there is a big quetion. The car iddles at 0.4 volts, and in the maf scaling table values for 0-1.02 volts are 0-s. So basicaly when we are multiplying those values by 1.4 we are gettion 0 at the end. Does this mean that we are not scaling the MAF in 0-1.02 volts area. Am I missing something ?

Last edited by YaroRS; May 16, 2011 at 03:21 PM.
Old May 16, 2011, 07:40 PM
  #8  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
check your formula/address for MAFV.

idle should still be around 0.8
Old May 16, 2011, 09:09 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
YaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
check your formula/address for MAFV.

idle should still be around 0.8
will check evoscan formula, but in Ecuflash even 0.8 v = 0 ? If I multiply it I will 0 obviously. So does this mean we are not adjusting those values ?
Old May 17, 2011, 07:08 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edit: nevermind. I read wrong.


But if you have a ROM ID, I can make sure your logging address is correct.
Old May 17, 2011, 08:55 AM
  #11  
Evolving Member
 
YaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by golden
edit: Nevermind. I read wrong.


But if you have a rom id, i can make sure your logging address is correct.
53050009
Old May 17, 2011, 09:41 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
 
kozmic27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Installing a velocity stack on the 3.5" maf will help the idle voltage. When doing maf calibrations from scratch TRUST THE MATH.
Old May 17, 2011, 10:34 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,222
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Just for reference it appears that the MAF voltage starts to hit 5v at around 300 ft/sec of flow, which means these are the rough crank HP limits based on pipe velocity:

550 crank HP = Stock MAF
650 crank HP = 3" MAF
900 crank HP = 3.5" MAF

Old May 17, 2011, 09:35 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YaroRS
53050009
MAF Volts should be at 23808F48.

You need to log 2 bytes and use "x/1024*5" for your eval.
Old May 17, 2011, 11:25 PM
  #15  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yup thats right..

older versions of evoscan had the 1byte/2byte confused...


Quick Reply: 3.5" Maf Scaling Table??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM.