evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution X Forums > Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 9, 2009, 09:16 PM   #151
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,708

Drives: 00 Eclipse GT SDS Stg. 3 & 08 RR EVO X GSR

Send a message via AIM to Clipse3GT
I think you are better off with getting your injector scaling dead on the ball and then upping the timing in cruise range. You will be better off with those settings.

I upped my timing more and managed to get about 2-3 mpg more at cruise with my injector trims at +1% idle and -0.5% cruise. Pretty close to 0, maybe the cruise fluctuates at more +/- 2%
__________________
List:
-Clipse3GT Tune -COBB UICP, LICP, BOV HP, SF Intake, Turbo Inlet Pipe, Sway Bars -ETS 4" FMIC -AMS DP, Fuel Rail, Rollerstop -T1R Exhaust -MXP TP -FORGE WGA -APS TV BOV -xMR Catch Cans -GM 3 Port -Deatschwerks 800cc -Techna-Fit SS Lines -TWM Short Shifter -WORKS Bushings -SWIFT Sport-Mach's -Whiteline Kit -AEM UEGO -STRI PSI Gauge -Rally Armor Mudflaps -PERRIN 3" Ant. -Advan RS 18x10

Future:
FP Green Turbo (to install)
XXX Exhaust Manifold
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 09:21 PM   #152
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,222

Drives: WW EvoX GSR

scalings or latencies?

scaling shouldn't really have an impact on MPG, since the trims will bring it back into place.

latencies on the other hand...
__________________
AUDM Black Evo IX 07 spec - writeoff thanks to someone that doesn't understand what a STOP sign is!
AUDM Yellow Evo IX - writeoff thanks to me rolling it at the Phillip Island Grand Prix Circuit :(
AUDM White Evo X - Powered by Colby@Tactrix, Richard@Aquamist

TephraMOD V7 - ECU mods AltMap, NLTS, KnockLight, Valet, Boost Mods, BIGMAP + more
yes - I have given up emptying my Inbox
Michael Jackson - RIP!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 09:34 PM   #153
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,777

Drives: 06 RR Evo RS (sold ) RR Evo X GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipse3GT View Post
I think you are better off with getting your injector scaling dead on the ball and then upping the timing in cruise range. You will be better off with those settings.

I upped my timing more and managed to get about 2-3 mpg more at cruise with my injector trims at +1% idle and -0.5% cruise. Pretty close to 0, maybe the cruise fluctuates at more +/- 2%
I increased timing +3 degrees from 2500-4000 0-40 load... it did help me some.. i'm not getting the 30 mpg that HiBoost is getting either... but as I had asked, I don't know if that's because of the less restrictive mods he has or not.
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

FIRST EVO X with AP tuned by Mellon!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 09:53 PM   #154
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,708

Drives: 00 Eclipse GT SDS Stg. 3 & 08 RR EVO X GSR

Send a message via AIM to Clipse3GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by tephra View Post
scalings or latencies?

scaling shouldn't really have an impact on MPG, since the trims will bring it back into place.

latencies on the other hand...
I meant it as both items. Most of the times you need to adjust both to get it right. If you adjust one and the other goes out of wack. So it's a bit balancing act.

So I meant adjust injector trim = latency & scaling.
__________________
List:
-Clipse3GT Tune -COBB UICP, LICP, BOV HP, SF Intake, Turbo Inlet Pipe, Sway Bars -ETS 4" FMIC -AMS DP, Fuel Rail, Rollerstop -T1R Exhaust -MXP TP -FORGE WGA -APS TV BOV -xMR Catch Cans -GM 3 Port -Deatschwerks 800cc -Techna-Fit SS Lines -TWM Short Shifter -WORKS Bushings -SWIFT Sport-Mach's -Whiteline Kit -AEM UEGO -STRI PSI Gauge -Rally Armor Mudflaps -PERRIN 3" Ant. -Advan RS 18x10

Future:
FP Green Turbo (to install)
XXX Exhaust Manifold
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 09:56 PM   #155
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,708

Drives: 00 Eclipse GT SDS Stg. 3 & 08 RR EVO X GSR

Send a message via AIM to Clipse3GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methodical4u View Post
I increased timing +3 degrees from 2500-4000 0-40 load... it did help me some.. i'm not getting the 30 mpg that HiBoost is getting either... but as I had asked, I don't know if that's because of the less restrictive mods he has or not.
I increased timing about 2-3 degree in the areas from 40-70% load and from 2250 to 4500 range. No knock at cruise. But the MPG increase was significant. Mixed HWY and City I easily average 22-23mpg, not really babying the car either but just regular driving and giving it a boot full on the ramps. I am sure on a long trip I could average about ~25 on the highway.
__________________
List:
-Clipse3GT Tune -COBB UICP, LICP, BOV HP, SF Intake, Turbo Inlet Pipe, Sway Bars -ETS 4" FMIC -AMS DP, Fuel Rail, Rollerstop -T1R Exhaust -MXP TP -FORGE WGA -APS TV BOV -xMR Catch Cans -GM 3 Port -Deatschwerks 800cc -Techna-Fit SS Lines -TWM Short Shifter -WORKS Bushings -SWIFT Sport-Mach's -Whiteline Kit -AEM UEGO -STRI PSI Gauge -Rally Armor Mudflaps -PERRIN 3" Ant. -Advan RS 18x10

Future:
FP Green Turbo (to install)
XXX Exhaust Manifold
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2009, 07:27 AM   #156
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Whitewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gillette Wyoming
Posts: 201

Drives: Evo x

You know I have not even F'ed with this because I don't drive my car much maybe next summer I'll play with this. Seems be help a lot of people out that are DD.
__________________
08 Evo SSS/WW Tsudo Cat-Back Exhaust (no cat)
ETS intake, ETS DP Open dump Ecuflash, Evoscan, Self tuned it now for my X (Thanks to the help of people on this forum) LC-1 Wideband, UR UICP,LICP and Garrett 4.5 IC, Perrin 3 Port, Forge WG, Forge BOV
(on the way), 20% tent and Rally Armor flaps all installs done by me and tuned by me.
78 Corvette 406sbc 175 shot.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2009, 04:35 PM   #157
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,777

Drives: 06 RR Evo RS (sold ) RR Evo X GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipse3GT View Post
I increased timing about 2-3 degree in the areas from 40-70% load and from 2250 to 4500 range. No knock at cruise. But the MPG increase was significant. Mixed HWY and City I easily average 22-23mpg, not really babying the car either but just regular driving and giving it a boot full on the ramps. I am sure on a long trip I could average about ~25 on the highway.
I may give this a try... just 2* from 40-70 and see what happens.
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

FIRST EVO X with AP tuned by Mellon!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2009, 01:51 AM   #158
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 48

Drives: 03 RSX Type S, 08 Evo X

currently if i drive my car 65mph i get 28.5mpg, 75mph 25-26mpg, 85mph 23-25, 95mph 21-23.5 mpg...

this is b4 i made some recent part throttle changes to my map....ill have to retest and see what it does...not to shabby based on how ****ty this car came from the factory...
__________________
03 RSX Type S_10.0:1_GT3582R
08 Evo X_FullRace_(soon to be powered by Garret)
K20A>4B11
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 12:12 AM   #159
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,777

Drives: 06 RR Evo RS (sold ) RR Evo X GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by palmerblock View Post
currently if i drive my car 65mph i get 28.5mpg, 75mph 25-26mpg, 85mph 23-25, 95mph 21-23.5 mpg...

this is b4 i made some recent part throttle changes to my map....ill have to retest and see what it does...not to shabby based on how ****ty this car came from the factory...
how do you have your timing/anything else set? Any mods on the car?

*edit* oh I see the FPred... that could make a difference too I guess.
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

FIRST EVO X with AP tuned by Mellon!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 12:13 AM   #160
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,777

Drives: 06 RR Evo RS (sold ) RR Evo X GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipse3GT View Post
I increased timing about 2-3 degree in the areas from 40-70% load and from 2250 to 4500 range. No knock at cruise. But the MPG increase was significant. Mixed HWY and City I easily average 22-23mpg, not really babying the car either but just regular driving and giving it a boot full on the ramps. I am sure on a long trip I could average about ~25 on the highway.
so do you think it's safe to adjust the 40-70 load 2 degrees?
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

FIRST EVO X with AP tuned by Mellon!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 09:28 AM   #161
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,042

Drives: 2008 Evolution X & 1996 Eclipse GSX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Methodical4u View Post
so do you think it's safe to adjust the 40-70 load 2 degrees?
I'm getting away with it but you definitely have to be carefull not to go too far and reduce power again. I'm sure the factory timing maps are somewhat conservative and on the low side of the optimal timing slope for any given RPM and load.
__________________
Chris Wirth
Onelap.RochesterDSM.org


2008 Evolution X (11.7 @ 118 mph)
- Garrett GT3076R - Prototype Intake Manifold
- Full-Race Tubular Exhaust Manifold - 800 CC Inj - Walbro FP
- ETS 4" FMIC - ETS 2.5" IC Pipes - AMS Intake
- ETS 3" v1 CB - ATP O2 DP w/ 44mm Tial
- MBC 25/27 psi - Works BOV - EcuFlash Tune
- ACT-ME1-HDG6 Clutch - ACT Streetlite Flywheel
- 275/30-19 Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08 on 19x9.5 Kosei K3 Wheels
- BC Racing ER Coilovers (10k/10k) - Rear Anti-roll Bar
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 10:17 AM   #162
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,777

Drives: 06 RR Evo RS (sold ) RR Evo X GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hiboost View Post
I'm getting away with it but you definitely have to be carefull not to go too far and reduce power again. I'm sure the factory timing maps are somewhat conservative and on the low side of the optimal timing slope for any given RPM and load.
yeah, that's why i'm trying just 2 degrees, instead of 3... I thought that would help at least some
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

FIRST EVO X with AP tuned by Mellon!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 11:12 AM   #163
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
E6-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: earth
Posts: 148

Drives: E-X

i also increased 2 deg timing. did some logging during cruise to get better milage

cruise @ 100 km/h load @ 40-60 range, cruise control on & rpm is @ approx. 2500

cruise @ 120 km/h load @ 50-80 range, cruise control on & rpm is @ approx. 3000

didn't note how much milage gained but definitely increased. was monitoring the milage after refuelling full tank.

i would try again by increasing 2 deg timing @ 2250-3500 rpm & load from 40-80. should be on the safe side.
__________________
Estimated 311 WHP 312 lb.ft TQ @ 24 psi Boost
HKS-UICP & LICP Pipes - Suction Reloaded Intake - Legamax Exhaust - Center Pipe
AMS-High Flow Race Cat
Innovate Motorsports-LC1 WB02 XD16 Gauge Combo
WGA
-Stock but forgot how many turns
ECU-Stock-Self tuned-EvoScan V2.7 Final Release
more on it's way when i have more time to install them & some EXTRA CASH to burn
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2009, 11:48 AM   #164
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,708

Drives: 00 Eclipse GT SDS Stg. 3 & 08 RR EVO X GSR

Send a message via AIM to Clipse3GT
As long as your IAT and CTS temps are within range and no knock.I say it's fine to advance the timing 2-3 degs in the 50-70 load areas. I did it and managed about 24mpg going 75mph on a 180 mile trip.
__________________
List:
-Clipse3GT Tune -COBB UICP, LICP, BOV HP, SF Intake, Turbo Inlet Pipe, Sway Bars -ETS 4" FMIC -AMS DP, Fuel Rail, Rollerstop -T1R Exhaust -MXP TP -FORGE WGA -APS TV BOV -xMR Catch Cans -GM 3 Port -Deatschwerks 800cc -Techna-Fit SS Lines -TWM Short Shifter -WORKS Bushings -SWIFT Sport-Mach's -Whiteline Kit -AEM UEGO -STRI PSI Gauge -Rally Armor Mudflaps -PERRIN 3" Ant. -Advan RS 18x10

Future:
FP Green Turbo (to install)
XXX Exhaust Manifold
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2009, 12:25 PM   #165
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SL, UT
Posts: 319

Drives: OB 08 Lancer Evo X

I managed roughly 26-27 mpg (at the pump) on a 1500 mile journey using 42 degrees BTDC advance in 40-80 load cells at highway cruise. Speed was between 70-80 mph the whole trip.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
154, advance, afr, eclipse, economy, efficient, evo, fuel, fuel economy, gsx, ignition, increase, lean cruise, making, mileage, mpg, timing advance

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0