MR with FP Red

PELIGRO · Aug 11, 2009, 04:05 PM

Tuned by Ruben @ Dyno Center in PR

Mods:
FP Red Turbo
Turboback Ultimate Racing
IC Piping Ultimate
Wallbro Fuel pump
800cc injectors
HKS drop in air filter
Pump Gas..93 octane

itsme4g63 · Aug 11, 2009, 04:34 PM

nice, hows the trans holding up?

MR. EVO MR · Aug 11, 2009, 04:39 PM

get some head studs, cams, better intake and raise that tq, she probably feels like a super car now huh?

ilive2win · Aug 11, 2009, 04:55 PM

congrats on the tune, i know it feels like a different car now. have fun with her

PR_Mivec · Aug 11, 2009, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsme4g63

nice, hows the trans holding up?

so far is running excellent

spdracerut · Aug 11, 2009, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR

get some head studs, cams, better intake and raise that tq, she probably feels like a super car now huh?

I'd leave the peak torque exactly where it is. That should keep the tranny more reliable. There's room for improvement on the top end though for sure.

maximus16 · Aug 11, 2009, 08:56 PM

great numbers.do you think you are going to upgrade the tranny any time soon.

Tractionlimit · Aug 12, 2009, 09:46 AM

Is this the stock WGA? How do you hold 25psi out past 7000 RPM? Most of the other Reds taper way off.

Thanks.

Postman1990 · Aug 13, 2009, 01:36 AM

How in the world did you keep torque that low with such a high whp result...like cobb can get near 330wtq and 310whp with stage 2 normally, and yet you are making less with almost 400whp (I suppose I should ask for a baseline for gain comparisons, but w/e)...looks like a perfect MR tune, as the tranny only seems to care about torque...tho why is your car listed as a gsr if this is an MR tune... if you could get 0-60s or 1/4s, that would be awesome to compare with what others are doing...seems like it could make low 12s...or, heaven forbid, one of the first MR cars in the 11s

boostsaves · Aug 13, 2009, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Postman1990

How in the world did you keep torque that low with such a high whp result...like cobb can get near 330wtq and 310whp with stage 2 normally, and yet you are making less with almost 400whp (I suppose I should ask for a baseline for gain comparisons, but w/e)...looks like a perfect MR tune, as the tranny only seems to care about torque...tho why is your car listed as a gsr if this is an MR tune... if you could get 0-60s or 1/4s, that would be awesome to compare with what others are doing...seems like it could make low 12s...or, heaven forbid, one of the first MR cars in the 11s

I dont think this is an mr, since his sig says he owns a gsr(i dunno if you can get a gsr w/sst in pr?. The tq is very low, and the whp is way too high on 25lbs esp on 93 pump. I made 374wheel with much more mods.

You will need to be way over 400whp in an mr to run into the 11's

toostar-ish · Aug 13, 2009, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boostsaves

I dont think this is an mr, since his sig says he owns a gsr(i dunno if you can get a gsr w/sst in pr?. The tq is very low, and the whp is way too high on 25lbs esp on 93 pump. I made 374wheel with much more mods.

You will need to be way over 400whp in an mr to run into the 11's

I don't think its his car , seems to be PR Mivec's but who knows... and in some countries you can get a GSR with the SST setup.

Was traction control fully off?

Maladjusted · Aug 13, 2009, 06:33 AM

get some cams to increase tq

617G · Aug 13, 2009, 07:58 AM

subscribed

DG Motors · Aug 13, 2009, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Postman1990

How in the world did you keep torque that low with such a high whp result...like cobb can get near 330wtq and 310whp with stage 2 normally, and yet you are making less with almost 400whp (I suppose I should ask for a baseline for gain comparisons, but w/e)...looks like a perfect MR tune, as the tranny only seems to care about torque...tho why is your car listed as a gsr if this is an MR tune... if you could get 0-60s or 1/4s, that would be awesome to compare with what others are doing...seems like it could make low 12s...or, heaven forbid, one of the first MR cars in the 11s

low timing and a few other things to keep torque down.

spdracerut · Aug 13, 2009, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Postman1990

How in the world did you keep torque that low with such a high whp result....

One of the main dependent variables for torque output is boost. Just keep the boost down and the torque stays down. That's why MBCs suck and people should just stick to using the factory ecu controlled boost or get a high tech electronic boost controller.

Part of the high WHP was due to being taken up to 8k rpms and being able to keep a reasonable amount of torque up there. Thought, if he had more torque at 8k, he'd gain a lot of power.