 |
|
Aug 11, 2009, 02:23 PM
|
#31
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 30
Drives: 06 IX MR
|
I should have added that I have about 50% wear at this point.
__________________
tbe/cone filter/rec. BOV/3 port solenoid/ ECU, e85 + 91 tune by MAC/1000cc injectors/fuel rail/255 pump/GTWorks springs/ds 2500 pads/custom bicycle hitch/kid seat/377hp 396tq on e; 334hp 356tq on 91 using DJ.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 02:24 PM
|
#32
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 892
Drives: Evo IX SE... graphite gray
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiller
|
What I didn't like about that tire test is their conclusions on the tires... not very descriptive (especially given their pros and cons for each tire), it seems like you could interchange the conclusions between the four tires and not know that they had been changed.
__________________
Mods made me delete my signature
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 02:40 PM
|
#33
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,970
Drives: 2010 Bathurst Black Genesis Coupe V6 Track
|
I have these tires as my autocross tires and love them. Like others have said they are noisy at highway speeds. Here is a link of a comparo that Car and Driver did for affordable summer tires. Guess who won?
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 02:59 PM
|
#34
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 892
Drives: Evo IX SE... graphite gray
|
^ Someone already mentioned this test in this thread.
__________________
Mods made me delete my signature
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 03:31 PM
|
#35
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYS
Posts: 2,007
Drives: IX SE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemwarrior
|
I'm actually thinking of trying the Hankook Evos that finished second in the test. They're almost 3lbs lighter per corner than the Z-1s.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 04:26 PM
|
#36
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 14)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 1,747
Drives: 04 SSL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJF
I'm actually thinking of trying the Hankook Evos that finished second in the test. They're almost 3lbs lighter per corner than the Z-1s.
|
Guess which tire is gonna have a softer side wall?
__________________
OCD IS NOT A DISEASE, IT'S A LIFESTYLE.
Kuniiizzzeee Dial-IN!
We the people are united, the ones you never look in the eye. We the people, the uninvited,
the ones that see right through your lies.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 06:41 PM
|
#37
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 8)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,970
Drives: 2010 Bathurst Black Genesis Coupe V6 Track
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83
^ Someone already mentioned this test in this thread.
|
I know that, but I figured I would post the link so they could read it for themself. Thanks though.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 11, 2009, 07:08 PM
|
#38
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYS
Posts: 2,007
Drives: IX SE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by revvin9k
Guess which tire is gonna have a softer side wall? 
|
You certainly have a point. I try, but I'm hardly the best driver around. Every time I've reduced rotational mass, I was able to corner quicker and smoother almost solely due to the way the car felt and the confidence it inspired. The car felt amazing after dropping 30lb via wheels and rotors. I'd be lying if I said that losing another ~12lbs at the tire didn't juice my lizard to the extreme.
On an interesting note, the car pulled abnormally high numbers on STM's MD, given its mods or their lack thereof. Em (at STM) thinks that it was partially due to relatively low rotational mass.
Getting back to tires, I'd really like to know more about the Hankooks. I'm sure the Z-1s are fantastic tires. I'd just hate to think it's the only option in this price range for the cornering sort, especially when significant benefits can be had by reducing the tires' weight.
Last edited by FJF; Aug 11, 2009 at 09:16 PM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 12, 2009, 03:54 AM
|
#39
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 23)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Monroe - WA
Posts: 1,108
Drives: 06 Evo MR
|
Agreed on the Hankooks - I'll have to keep my eye out for reviews/testimonials. Sorry for not posting the link earlier - I actually <gasp> get the magazine and was too lazy to dig it up online.
*edit - one thing to note is that one of the drivers during the C&D test has a pretty good background in racing/testing. That said, he is likely to feel minute differences better than 99% of the people out there. I think the numbers speak for themselves as the Hankooks hung next to the Z1s, if not surpassed them, in most of the tests.
Last edited by yahu; Aug 12, 2009 at 03:56 AM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 12, 2009, 03:59 AM
|
#40
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 881
Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII
|
Had tirerack not had a deal not to be ignored on the RE01Rs i would have went with the Z1 star specs...
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 12, 2009, 10:21 AM
|
#41
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Island, NE
Posts: 1,268
Drives: '03 Evo 8, '04 WRX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddie
Had tirerack not had a deal not to be ignored on the RE01Rs i would have went with the Z1 star specs...
|
Same here. However the RE01R tire has turned out to have a personality all its own and I like it. Crusing around town they feel like I bought a $50 Walmart tire. Push them, expecially if the pavement is warm, and they suddenly become the OEM tire except no noise. It is a sweet combination. Too bad they are gone.
|
|
Online
|
|
Aug 14, 2009, 12:35 PM
|
#42
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 131
Drives: Evo IX MR
|
yea I'd like to find out more about the Hankook RS-3's. I would just worry that weak sidewalls cause the car to be harder to control especially for a car as heavy that 60% of the weight up front.
The tires i'd like to try are the AD-08. I think if I researched them a little more I might of got them over the Z1's. The AD-08's are supposed to have a stronger than the AD-07's and actually come in our stock size. The AD-08's weight 25 lbs in our stock size, where the Z1's weight 27 lbs.
Problem is the Yoko's cost ~ $60 more per tire.  Thing is the AD-08's seem to grip at the same or very close to the Z1's. So it the sidewalls are as strong they should provide better feed back since they are 2 lbs lighter. Don't get me wrong the Z1's rock! especially for the price. I have them and they are very responsive and stick super well. They are not as responsive as the 046's but what are. They are light years better than the RT-615 in grip, rain performance, and responsiveness.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 14, 2009, 01:20 PM
|
#43
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 126
|
star spec
I just pt these on my 05' evo8 gsr with stock rims but got them in the 255-40-17 size. I believe the extra width and shorter sidewall make a bid difference in handling. Absolutely no rubbing or lock to lock interference and I have Tanabe gf210 springs. I should have gone to this size on the last set of tires. Don't be a spend thrift to just same $30 a tire. Think about the cost per month to see that a better tire is worth it.
__________________
Rides:
05' GSR Evo 8 (344 wheel HP)
07' ZO6
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 14, 2009, 01:32 PM
|
#44
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 35)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA!
Posts: 977
Drives: RC Cars!
|
You'll be cool. I use to have these tires. They're pretty good for daily driving.  Me rickey long time!
And just like everyone says, yes they're loud!! :x
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 14, 2009, 01:48 PM
|
#45
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 14)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: valdosta, ga
Posts: 1,218
Drives: 06 Evo RS
|
dont go with the S.Drives! i wish i would have bought the Z1's but i will next time for sure!!!
__________________
Mods:
JunB.L - Espelir - Perrin HFC - K&N - Forge MBC - Walbro 255 FP - Advans
Prosport Amber/ WhiteBoost gauge - GTWorx Springs - 17" Rota Boost - LICP
LC-1 o2 - ETS air filter kit - ACT HD clutch/Flywheel - SpoolinUp COP kit - Tuned by Mellon
12.541 @110.20 and 2nd place in show LOL
312 whp - 312wtq DLL
306 whp - 320wtq DynoDynamics AWD dyno
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
|
Tags
|
daily, difference, direzza, driver, evo, expected, mileage, miles, rated, sale, spec, sport, star, starspec, tires, z1  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|