Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics

Old Jun 7, 2006, 01:44 AM
  #1  
Ree
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Latvia, Europe :}
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics

Here are few scans from local magazine which lately reviewed euro spec evo IX and 06 STI. The review itself is nothing new though they also brought cars to the wind tunnel.

The red arrow represents lift at air flow of 40m/s (around 144km/h or ~90mph), the blue – at 55m/s (approximately 200km/h or 124mph). The lift is measured in newtons. One newton equals roughly 0.22 lbs.

For charts see attached images.
Attached Thumbnails Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-lift.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-rotation.jpg  
Old Jun 7, 2006, 01:54 AM
  #2  
Ree
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Latvia, Europe :}
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
few more pictures
Attached Thumbnails Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow1.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow2.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow3.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow4.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow5.jpg  

Old Jun 7, 2006, 01:55 AM
  #3  
Ree
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Latvia, Europe :}
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..and one more
Attached Thumbnails Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-airflow6.jpg  
Old Jun 7, 2006, 01:55 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SlyEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Marino, Ca
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice!
Old Jun 7, 2006, 02:24 AM
  #5  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
WW IX RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so the sti has some super downforce action going on in the back huh? oh well the mitsu is better in the front!
Old Jun 7, 2006, 03:16 AM
  #6  
Ree
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Latvia, Europe :}
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is Cx data of evo vs. sti. At first I attached the one with Mazda 6 vs. STI.
Attached Thumbnails Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-rotation2.jpg   Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics-lift3.jpg  
Old Jun 7, 2006, 03:35 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
modvp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Ree! It's great to finally see a Cd posted for the Evo.
Old Jun 7, 2006, 04:45 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
 
Eggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't understand these pictures
Old Jun 7, 2006, 05:30 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
EVOLVEU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1+^
Old Jun 7, 2006, 05:33 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
 
GPTourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,312
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Eggy
I don't understand these pictures
Heh, so I'm not the only one. I get the "point" of the first set of pics, as well as the overall cD of drag on the last one. Both cars are not very aerodynamic, but the Evo is one one thousandths better. Yea. But all the other forces at work escape me. Are higher or lower numbers desireable?
Old Jun 7, 2006, 05:41 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
honda-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 3,589
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by WW IX RS
so the sti has some super downforce action going on in the back huh? oh well the mitsu is better in the front!
maybe the reason why the sti had more rear end down force is because it had more lift on the front end which transfer the car's weight to the rear. just a thought.
Old Jun 7, 2006, 05:57 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
 
LetItBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: City O Sin, MA...the not so sinish part though...
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by honda-guy
maybe the reason why the sti had more rear end down force is because it had more lift on the front end which transfer the car's weight to the rear. just a thought.
I dont think it woks like that. I really wish someone would do this to an evo with and without the rear wing.
Old Jun 7, 2006, 06:14 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
 
byron3636's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LetItBreath
I dont think it woks like that. I really wish someone would do this to an evo with and without the rear wing.
It has to work like that, unless you're willing to say those forces will actually make the evo's frame flex.
Old Jun 7, 2006, 06:40 AM
  #14  
Newbie
 
perfectevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No vortex generator on the Evo IX. It would be interesting to see how much that changes things.
Old Jun 7, 2006, 08:15 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
 
byron3636's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by perfectevo
No vortex generator on the Evo IX. It would be interesting to see how much that changes things.
+1

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Evo IX vs. STI aerodynamics



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:31 PM.