evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 27, 2009, 10:23 AM   #151
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
Freddy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 484

Drives: 03 Evo VIII

Send a message via AIM to Freddy302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000 View Post
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.

Good call man! The AMS kit is still the best and well crafted kit for a 450-600 whp (dynojet) Evo. When the kit was made the smaller runner manifold, and .63 housing are perfect for Horsepower and Torque in that 450-600whp. Now with all these big "small" turbos running around. To extract that power up you need to step up to a bigger runner manifold, and a bigger turbine housing.

Good luck with your Sick Ride..
__________________
804 whp/650 wtrq (dyno dynamics 1.2 correction)
FP HTA86, Driven Innovative Intake, Turbo Trix long Block, APS Exhaust, BF FMIC, AEM w/1600cc inj

Old setup 487 hp/ 510 trq FP Evo Green

TheShopCT.com Built
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 10:27 AM   #152
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (13)
 
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Palm FL , NYC
Posts: 3,620

Drives: 2006 Evolution IX, 2006 Range Rover Sport SC

Thanks alot , I got your PM it will be time to shine very soon , I'll let yu know see if want to ride out
__________________
AMS BUILT 2.3\GT950R

620awhp pump 93 octane all day!!
788awhp C-16!!

Import Tuner baby!!
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sho...e-release.html

Red line Time Attack 09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDfLlDXErw

TTR Dyno run 600awhp pump 93octane DD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swa2nU4DTLg

10 sec.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ijrz_hI2dM
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 11:00 AM   #153
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (18)
 
Nissan2Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 477

Drives: TB Evo IX

Send a message via AIM to Nissan2Evo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000 View Post
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.
Great to hear Mr. Sharkbite. You saw the thread I posted where we modified the AMS mani to accomodate an .82a/r housing. With that setup you'll have one hell of a powerband. Keep us posted on what goes down!
__________________
JMS Racing Black Mamba Evo IX JMS Built, J-tuned
Best Pass: 10.01 @ 147mph..1.78 60' (Q16, QTP's)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 11:10 AM   #154
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (13)
 
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Palm FL , NYC
Posts: 3,620

Drives: 2006 Evolution IX, 2006 Range Rover Sport SC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan2Evo View Post
Great to hear Mr. Sharkbite. You saw the thread I posted where we modified the AMS mani to accomodate an .82a/r housing. With that setup you'll have one hell of a powerband. Keep us posted on what goes down!
Didn't see your result on that set-up how did that do ?

I was very intrested in your dyno numbers but it got kinda of quite so I didnt hear anything else.
__________________
AMS BUILT 2.3\GT950R

620awhp pump 93 octane all day!!
788awhp C-16!!

Import Tuner baby!!
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sho...e-release.html

Red line Time Attack 09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDfLlDXErw

TTR Dyno run 600awhp pump 93octane DD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swa2nU4DTLg

10 sec.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ijrz_hI2dM
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 12:04 PM   #155
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (9)
 
laramie_05MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 242

Drives: gg mr

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000 View Post
Texas Mile looking real good might be going out there this year.
Bring it. I would love to see this car out there. I should be running it again.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan l View Post
Pretty soon its going to be like the engine room in star trek with ****ing lights, horns, and steam valves going off when **** hits the fan.
IX turbo
ETS FMIC, hard pipes and maf pipe
IX bov
FIC 1050s
TephraMOD 96530706
Machine work by Watt Bigham and built by ME.
Big THANKS to the guys at Evolution Dynamics
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 08:09 PM   #156
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
riggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 27

Drives: 98 RB26DET 240SX

Send a message via AIM to riggs
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/U...rts_684585.htm

The Dyno Video....
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 09:09 PM   #157
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
EvolutionBoy67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 305

Drives: Sold my 06 STI =( Now getting an EVO IX MR =)

^nice numbers and funny ass comments. KA24DE FTW!!!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2009, 09:13 PM   #158
Plat Vendor
Personal Sales Rating: (136)
 
Mike@AwdMotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,443

Drives: 2005 Evo RS.. 1st Street Evo in the 8's!!

Send a message via AIM to Mike@AwdMotorsports Send a message via MSN to Mike@AwdMotorsports
Switch over to a kit that allows .82 rear and if you have room get the big cover with 3" outlet... My feeling is that the 6765 needs more room to breathe and thats why its down on power.. We did make around 40 more HP over the 6262 but i think my setup was even limited with small front cover, 2.5" piping and 65mm TB.. I am going to step up the piping and TB and well see if i can get the 875whp i think the 6765 is capable of.. Ill have results next week.. Ill keep you guys updated..

Mike
__________________
The #1 Buschur Racing Dealer in the US

Tel. 954-753-6006
AIM= mikeatawd
www.AwdMotorsports.com
  • 2003 Black Evo GSR - 8.75@163mph (US Quickest 4g63 Evo )
  • World's Quickest Evo 8 Street Car - 8.98@156mph
  • World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Turbo Evo - 10.21@133mph ( Most-Wanted )
  • World's Quickest Mivec Evo 9.05@157mph( Most-Wanted )
  • Florida's Quickest Evo IX Street Car - 9.75@143mph ( Shaun's )
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 11:50 AM   #159
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
riggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 27

Drives: 98 RB26DET 240SX

Send a message via AIM to riggs
Mike, I'm tracking my .81 T4 housing and I should have some new numbers next week as well.(Maybe even this weekend.)

I'm more curious to see if I have to step up to the .96 a/r due to backpressure issues with the smaller housings.

Next week should be interesting for us both.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2009, 01:25 PM   #160
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ny/ct
Posts: 368

Drives: Evolution IX.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000 View Post
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.

I would go with the the .82 ar if i was you since your on a stroker. And your looking to make mad power.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 01:19 PM   #161
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
riggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 27

Drives: 98 RB26DET 240SX

Send a message via AIM to riggs
You can just order the backhousing Sharkbite, it's less than $200.....or just see if Precision will swap out the housings...it's a direct bolt-on to your current turbo..
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 01:35 PM   #162
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (8)
 
SRT-TO-EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,409

Drives: WW IX MR

Send a message via AIM to SRT-TO-EVO
Quote:
Originally Posted by riggs View Post
You can just order the backhousing Sharkbite, it's less than $200.....or just see if Precision will swap out the housings...it's a direct bolt-on to your current turbo..
But not to the manifold I believe.
__________________
Old car-03 Solar Yellow SRT-4-398/396 whp/tq

Ivey Tuned

Powered by Forced Performance
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2009, 03:16 PM   #163
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
EVO8_PR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San German,Puerto Rico
Posts: 357

Drives: 2005 Electric Blue EVO 8, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander

I believe the problem is not @ the manifold it is the 5 bolt exhaust pattern vs the 4 bolt which prevents it from being a "bolt on" on the AMS kits.
__________________
PT6262 equipped Electric Blue EvoVIII
OEM Yokohama's 10.84@135
M/T Motorcycle Slicks 10.24@136

VR4 Tuning Videos

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVOgasmIX View Post
Maybe the 4G63 was over built by accident and not on purpose. Seriously, why would anyone design a 2.0 L block that could handle 900+ hp 25 years ago?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2009, 04:12 PM   #164
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
riggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 27

Drives: 98 RB26DET 240SX

Send a message via AIM to riggs
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRT-TO-EVO View Post
But not to the manifold I believe.
It's not that difficult to cut off and weld on a new flange....
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2009, 04:15 PM   #165
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (13)
 
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Palm FL , NYC
Posts: 3,620

Drives: 2006 Evolution IX, 2006 Range Rover Sport SC

The only way I see to go is with a shear header and then my choices open up as of right now im just stuck with this AMS kit which will be for sale very soon
__________________
AMS BUILT 2.3\GT950R

620awhp pump 93 octane all day!!
788awhp C-16!!

Import Tuner baby!!
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sho...e-release.html

Red line Time Attack 09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDfLlDXErw

TTR Dyno run 600awhp pump 93octane DD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swa2nU4DTLg

10 sec.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ijrz_hI2dM
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2009, 6765, 950r, ams, april, billet, evo, import, iveytune, pics, pt, results, tuner, turbo, wwwams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0