evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 5, 2009, 02:38 AM   #76
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Pohjeekiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 29

Drives: TB EVO IX SE

To stroke or not to stroke....

__________________
A bunch of parts to go super fast...
DTMotorsports
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2009, 11:29 PM   #77
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 60

Drives: Evo 8.5

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sectalon View Post
Love my 2.3l with the GT35R. ENJOY!
Are you stroked? If so what kind of hp are you throwing down? In the process of stroking the engine right now and looking for a good turbo to throw on...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2009, 11:37 PM   #78
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Johnboy1065's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Knoxville Tennessee
Posts: 1,248

Drives: Lancer Evolution VIII

Send a message via ICQ to Johnboy1065 Send a message via AIM to Johnboy1065
I run a HTA 3586R with a 2.3 liter, numbers should be coming soon!!!
__________________
Buschur Tuned 500+ WHP on 93 Octane!
2.3 Liter Stroker, Buschur Front facing turbo kit w/HTA 3586R, Buschur Stage 3 Head w/BF 272 Cams, Driven Innovations Intake manifold, Buschur Race Core Intercooler

For Sale Air conditioning parts!! http://forums.evolutionm.net/sale-pa...ning-pump.html

For sale MAF sensor!!! http://forums.evolutionm.net/sale-en...af-sensor.html
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2009, 11:42 PM   #79
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 60

Drives: Evo 8.5

Nice, I'll be interested to see what kind of numbers you pull. Let me know...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2009, 03:57 PM   #80
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
toverton30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Clayton N.C
Posts: 111

Drives: ww 03 Evo 8

Send a message via AIM to toverton30
Great info!!!!!..


Ps im looking for a 03 T-case
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 12, 2009, 09:36 PM   #81
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
slowr_evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 181

Drives: 06' Evo GSR 92' civic hatch

stroke it dont beat it!! but good info
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2009, 11:04 AM   #82
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
mitsuclipsegsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: dover plains ny
Posts: 39

Drives: 06 Evo MR

Send a message via AIM to mitsuclipsegsx
I had my eclipse stroked. it was nice on the street with a 50 trim, but if I were to do it again I would of done a built 2.0
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2009, 11:29 AM   #83
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Queens
Posts: 52

Drives: G35

Stroke it brooooooooooooo
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 26, 2009, 08:47 PM   #84
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
RapedApe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 61

Drives: 04 BBY SSL - 2.3L

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsuclipsegsx View Post
I had my eclipse stroked. it was nice on the street with a 50 trim, but if I were to do it again I would of done a built 2.0
I bought my Evo with a 2.3L and bb 50 trim. If you are going stroker, don't waste your time on anything smaller than a 54 lb/min turbo. I personally will upgrade to at least 65 lb/min. This 50 trim with .63 housing makes 356 tq at 4700 and 351 hp at 5700 on a mustang dyno. HP drops to 320 at 7200. The car has stock head with HKS 264/272 cams. The turbo just can't keep up with the 2.3 and you can feel it.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2009, 08:39 AM   #85
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: montreal
Posts: 11

Drives: eclipse 2003

4g64 2.5l strocker
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2009, 09:20 AM   #86
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15

Drives: 350Z TT

great info
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 04:56 PM   #87
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LB, N. Jersey
Posts: 59

Drives: evo 8

very informative.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 02:40 PM   #88
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Thomasevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hammond, LA
Posts: 56

Drives: 2003 EVO

Send a message via AIM to Thomasevo Send a message via Yahoo to Thomasevo
stroke it 2.3L rocks
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2009, 01:49 AM   #89
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
kjewer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 781

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBradley View Post
I also do not believe nitrous helps spool, it only helps off spool power which means it gets to where the turbo would normally spool faster than without.
Old thread found while searching I know, but for the sake of the archives... Nitrous definitely does help spool. I agree with your reasoning above for increases in CR, but remember that nitrous is more air and more fuel burned at that same rpm, which results in more exhaust product, which results in a lower boost threshold. It's the same thing as increasing displacement, more exhaust product per rpm level. In fact I think one could make the arguement that if you add 20% of your power with nitrous the effect on boost threshold is the same as a 20% increase in displacement. I used this theory to calculate the increase in fuel requirements with a dry system on my car and it worked out to within the accuracy of my horsepower measurement at low rpm.

On the automatic the benfit is two fold since the added torque also gets you higher up on the converter making more boost, but that conversion is unlikely to interest anyone here.
__________________
Kevin Jewer
92 Talon RWD, compound turbos - 8.98 @ 156
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
156mm, 21, 23, 4g63, cons, destroked, dsm, evo, jai, magnus, pros, s300sx, stroker, subaru, weight

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0