evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 10, 2008, 04:27 PM   #421
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PacNW
Posts: 121

Thanks to AMS and all the cam manufacturers for all their hard work.

Personally I am not surprised at the excellent numbers that Kelford has put out. I am currently using a custom grind from them on my nissan vvl build and I have had nothing short of a great experience working with kelford.

Tell them what you are after and they will make sure you have the cams that make power
__________________
2006 GG Evo MR
SR22VE Sentra (project car)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 04:46 PM   #422
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (61)
 
evovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,225

Drives: Evo 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludikraut View Post
Kevin, being that I am in the market for a new set of cams, could you elaborate on the difference between your 272 and 280 cams for the Evo 8? Also how do your 272 cams compare to HKS 280 cams?

I am running the same setup as Martin, the only difference is that I am running a 50 trim turbo instead of the 35R. I am specifically interested in a road racing application ... in other words good power, but not so aggressive as to put excessive wear and tear on my valvetrain (supertech).

Thanks,

Markus
+1 Id like to know also.( w/37R on mine)
__________________

10.90@129mph(sunnoco 116)
best trap 135mph



PT6262


Tuned by Mark @ TTR


TurboTrix Racing
http://www.turbotrix.com/wordpress/

SparkTech Ignitions
http://www.sparktechignitions.net/
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 04:51 PM   #423
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (40)
 
wshihdnevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,426

Drives: '05 apex silver evo 8

Send a message via AIM to wshihdnevo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamMan View Post
Obviously the magazine and AMS can't build every setup to test, but in my view they have chosen a very common build.
When people are shopping for cams they really need to consult the engine builder, tuner and cam maker to get the correct choice.

The 272 of ours that Martin tested is the 8th iteration of our 272 degree EVO cam, (no one puts more effort into EVO cam R&D than we do) we decreased the seat to seat duration and added more area at higher lifts and this gave us the balance that we have been looking for (good idle, spool and top end)

Because of the low total duration it also works well with smaller turbos than what was tested here.

Big UP'S to Import Tuner mag and AMS for a very good job, and to Motovicity along with their dealer network for supporting our range of products.


Kevin Ban
Managing Director
Kelford Cams
New Zealand


Kevin,

Can your 272 cams be used w/ stock valvetrain w/ the 11mm of lift that they are advertised at reliably or would you recommend upgraded valvetrain?
__________________
Ported IX Turbo/Buddy Club 272/280/Magnus Street SMIM/Muse exhaust manifold/ETS Short Route UICP/LICP/4" MAFless intake/ETS 3.5" Exhaust/ETS 3" widetank fmic/Walbro 255/ACT HD/GM 3 port BCS/Speed Density on stock ECU

MidgetSpec&English Racing
ETS
EDRCrew
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 06:46 PM   #424
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (11)
 
Ph3n1x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,248

Drives: 05 Pum Pum Rider

Send a message via AIM to Ph3n1x Send a message via Yahoo to Ph3n1x
Those Kelford 280's look mean. 11.5mm/11.5mm lift
__________________
No sig....sighhh
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 07:07 PM   #425
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 13

Drives: Ford Bronco, Ford Escort, Ford Falcon, Honda Civic, EVOX (coming soon)

Marcus,
I have no experiance with the HKS280 sorry.
For road course racing, if the tracks are like we have here, where you are up and down the gearbox a lot I would be stcking with the 272's, if you are able to wind the thin out plenty I would consider the 280 on the intake side as it will make more top end on that setup.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 07:11 PM   #426
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 13

Drives: Ford Bronco, Ford Escort, Ford Falcon, Honda Civic, EVOX (coming soon)

Quote:
Originally Posted by evovin View Post
+1 Id like to know also.( w/37R on mine)
Depends on application, boost, fuel, porting etc. but we would generally use 280's
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 07:15 PM   #427
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 13

Drives: Ford Bronco, Ford Escort, Ford Falcon, Honda Civic, EVOX (coming soon)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wshihdnevo View Post
Kevin,

Can your 272 cams be used w/ stock valvetrain w/ the 11mm of lift that they are advertised at reliably or would you recommend upgraded valvetrain?
You are best to upgrade.
Although the stock spring will not coil bind, it does not have enough valve control at raised boost and rpm levels, then if you miss a gear and buzz the engine, you have no safety margin.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 07:18 PM   #428
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 13

Drives: Ford Bronco, Ford Escort, Ford Falcon, Honda Civic, EVOX (coming soon)

Guys, I am not a big contributor to forums etc, if you have any questions, please feel free to send them to me via the camshaftshop website.
Happy motoring.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 08:16 PM   #429
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
JC evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 722

Drives: EVO1

Kelford VS S2. S2 is the darker line. Is Martin going to post his conclusions on the testing? Were the cams also tested at a higher boost level, are those resluts going to be put up?
__________________
built 2L - GSCS2 - Hypertune intake - GT3582.....
490whp pump gas 27psi dynamics 1.0CF

Last edited by JC evo1; Jun 10, 2008 at 08:18 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 08:50 PM   #430
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (14)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 5,209

Drives: 03 Evo VIII, 04 A8L, 00 A4 1.8T, 08 R32, 82 YF750

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamMan View Post
Marcus,
I have no experiance with the HKS280 sorry.
For road course racing, if the tracks are like we have here, where you are up and down the gearbox a lot I would be stcking with the 272's, if you are able to wind the thin out plenty I would consider the 280 on the intake side as it will make more top end on that setup.
Thank you !

l8r)
__________________
"Learning is the beginning of knowledge ...
knowledge is the beginning of understanding ...
understanding is the beginning of wisdom."

Suspension book for sale, NEW

Quote:
Any society that would give up a little bit of liberty to gain a little bit of security will deserve neither and lose both.
- Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson -
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 09:40 PM   #431
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 258

Drives: 05 Evo GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamMan View Post
You are best to upgrade.
Although the stock spring will not coil bind, it does not have enough valve control at raised boost and rpm levels, then if you miss a gear and buzz the engine, you have no safety margin.
Hmm...makes me second guess going with Kelford. I just don't want to get into that for the stock turbo. Doesn't seem worth it at that point if you don't plan on going larger.

Edit: Hmm...on the Kelford website they have one a step below the 272's. 264/270. Seems comparable to the GSC S1's roughly.
__________________
AMS TBE | K&N filter | Forge DV | Forge MBC | Walbro 255 | PPI LICP | Kelford 264 | Swift Sport | MR struts | Payne tune

Last edited by RyeLou; Jun 10, 2008 at 09:48 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 10:29 PM   #432
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (74)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,448

Drives: Evo MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeLou View Post
Hmm...makes me second guess going with Kelford. I just don't want to get into that for the stock turbo. Doesn't seem worth it at that point if you don't plan on going larger.

That seems to me to be a lift issue and not a Kelford issue. With 11.0mm of lift, most companies I've seen at least recommend upgraded springs and retainers.
__________________
GO HERE TO SEND US A TB: http://forums.evolutionm.net/showpos...&postcount=158

GET 100 cell race cats: http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-sal...available.html

GET MIL.SPEC TB'S HERE:

AMS CHICAGO, IL
CBRD YORK, PA
ENGLISH RACING CAMAS, WA
GST HAYWARD, CA
MAP PLYMOUTH, MN
MFQ BURBANK, CA
SPEED ELEMENT FREMONT, CA
REESE TUNING SANTEE, CA
TTP ORLANDO, FL
TUNING TECH COLTON, CA
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10, 2008, 10:36 PM   #433
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Ivan@AMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 983

Drives: 97 240sx 95 240sx KA 92 Talon

Caution should be used when running stock valve train with larger lift cams. The factory retainers will contact the factory seals long before the coils will bind.
__________________
Ivan

Special projects technician

AMSperformance.com
Tel. 847-709-0530
  • World's QUICKEST EVO 8 - 8.42 with a best trap of 171 MPH
  • World’s Most Powerful EVO – 1142 awhp
  • 2008 AMS Racing – 40 Victories in Road Racing and Hill Climb

CLICK HERE for all of our latest videos and pictures
CLICK HERE to join or view our FACEBOOK group
CLICK HERE for the most up to date news, products and events at AMS

Powered by NOS Energy Drink!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2008, 12:21 AM   #434
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redmond Washington
Posts: 128

Drives: 2000 BMW 528i Sport "the sweet six"; 1990 Eagle Talon Tsi "Now THIS is a Sports Car!"; 1990 Toyota Corolla "10 times around the world"; 2006 Pontiac GTO "How stupid that GM quit making this wonderful car!"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC View Post
That seems to me to be a lift issue and not a Kelford issue. With 11.0mm of lift, most companies I've seen at least recommend upgraded springs and retainers.
Right. Lift that exceeds the original design envelope, and extreme acceleration of the moving masses, those are the problems. Read FP's web page on the FP5R for some good clues on what the wilder cams do to your valvetrain. I don't mean to say that it's all death and destruction, but everything has to be right.

http://store.forcedperformance.net/m...=Lancer-Engine

Gary

Last edited by Talonboost; Jun 11, 2008 at 12:27 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2008, 04:15 AM   #435
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
frenchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 328

Drives: MITSUBISHI EVOLUTION VIII,SRT-4(Sold),07 Eclipse Spyder GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamMan View Post
Obviously the magazine and AMS can't build every setup to test, but in my view they have chosen a very common build.
When people are shopping for cams they really need to consult the engine builder, tuner and cam maker to get the correct choice.

The 272 of ours that Martin tested is the 8th iteration of our 272 degree EVO cam, (no one puts more effort into EVO cam R&D than we do) we decreased the seat to seat duration and added more area at higher lifts and this gave us the balance that we have been looking for (good idle, spool and top end)

Because of the low total duration it also works well with smaller turbos than what was tested here.

Big UP'S to Import Tuner mag and AMS for a very good job, and to Motovicity along with their dealer network for supporting our range of products.


Kevin Ban
Managing Director
Kelford Cams
New Zealand
Are those the TX272? So I can go ahead and order them
__________________
Tuned by Mellon!


WTBTANABE GF210 USED PM ME!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ams, bottom, cam, cams, camshaft, combination, end, evo, idle, ix, magazine, modified, power, test, testing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0