evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 20, 2008, 10:39 AM   #241
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
turbo271's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Palatine, Chicago, IL
Posts: 200

Drives: 2004 WW EVO VIII (sold)

So Martin, I know that this test is not about how a relativly stock evo, but what is your recommendation for a virtually stock evo? Which cams would you give the best marks to overall? (ex. HKS 272, HKS 280, FP4R, GCS3)

I'm talking about Daily Drivability & Great power for just a drop-in.
__________________
9.8 / AP/ Skunk2 CB & TP / TurboXS DP / HKS RS Intake / HKS SSQV BOV ver2 / Homemade Recirculation kit / Swift Spec R springs / Cusco ver2 underbrace / Black OEM Enkeis / Broken Front Bumber - GHETTO!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 10:51 AM   #242
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
PsychDr. HN$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 310

Drives: 2003 CT9A GSR, 2006 Range Rover Sport SC, 1998 Ford F150

for me it kinda come down to HKS 272 or BC 280's drop right in. GSC S2's make more power but REQUIRE springs and retainers. I prolly wont go any larer than a HTA 30R but more than likely I will do a HTA FP Green. Even if i did BC's which are the least expensive and powerful of the cams testing, I do realize than ANY cam would be better than the STOCKER.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 11:14 AM   #243
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Martin@AMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 162

Drives: 800whp 2004 EVO VIII, 540whp 2005 Cadillac CTS-V, '01 VW GTi

GSC S3's are up
__________________
Martin Musial
-President-
Martin@amsperformance.com
AMSperformance.com
Tel. 847-709-0530
  • World's QUICKEST EVO 8 - 8.42 with a best trap of 171 MPH
  • World’s Most Powerful EVO – 1142 awhp
  • 2008 AMS Racing – 40 Victories in Road Racing and Hill Climb

CLICK HERE for all of our latest videos and pictures
CLICK HERE to join or view our FACEBOOK group
CLICK HERE for the most up to date news, products and events at AMS

Powered by NOS Energy Drink!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 11:18 AM   #244
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Martin@AMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 162

Drives: 800whp 2004 EVO VIII, 540whp 2005 Cadillac CTS-V, '01 VW GTi

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo271 View Post
So Martin, I know that this test is not about how a relativly stock evo, but what is your recommendation for a virtually stock evo? Which cams would you give the best marks to overall? (ex. HKS 272, HKS 280, FP4R, GCS3)

I'm talking about Daily Drivability & Great power for just a drop-in.
You have to be carefull with a stock turbo, too big of an exhaust cam with an early opening event will bleed off too much pressure on the combustion stroke. I would stay with something mild and possibly different duration on the intake & exhaust cam. This is something I'll be experimenting with. HKS 272 are still great, possibly S1's even though I didn't test them, FP4R's.
__________________
Martin Musial
-President-
Martin@amsperformance.com
AMSperformance.com
Tel. 847-709-0530
  • World's QUICKEST EVO 8 - 8.42 with a best trap of 171 MPH
  • World’s Most Powerful EVO – 1142 awhp
  • 2008 AMS Racing – 40 Victories in Road Racing and Hill Climb

CLICK HERE for all of our latest videos and pictures
CLICK HERE to join or view our FACEBOOK group
CLICK HERE for the most up to date news, products and events at AMS

Powered by NOS Energy Drink!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 11:21 AM   #245
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Martin@AMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 162

Drives: 800whp 2004 EVO VIII, 540whp 2005 Cadillac CTS-V, '01 VW GTi

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsychDr. HN$ View Post
for me it kinda come down to HKS 272 or BC 280's drop right in. GSC S2's make more power but REQUIRE springs and retainers. I prolly wont go any larer than a HTA 30R but more than likely I will do a HTA FP Green. Even if i did BC's which are the least expensive and powerful of the cams testing, I do realize than ANY cam would be better than the STOCKER.
BC 280's have a rough idle and drive ability for the power gains. I ran the BC cams straight at zero on the cam gears to see how they would perform not being degreed in. The power was way down and they really idled and drove poorly. I would recommend the S2's, Kelford 272's or the FP5R's at that point.
__________________
Martin Musial
-President-
Martin@amsperformance.com
AMSperformance.com
Tel. 847-709-0530
  • World's QUICKEST EVO 8 - 8.42 with a best trap of 171 MPH
  • World’s Most Powerful EVO – 1142 awhp
  • 2008 AMS Racing – 40 Victories in Road Racing and Hill Climb

CLICK HERE for all of our latest videos and pictures
CLICK HERE to join or view our FACEBOOK group
CLICK HERE for the most up to date news, products and events at AMS

Powered by NOS Energy Drink!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 11:28 AM   #246
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
rEVoLed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UT
Posts: 100

Drives: 03 TB EVO VIII

How much worse is the GSC3 in terms of drivablity issues and you mention choppier idle? How bad is it? I'm looking to upgrade from the HKS 272 when I get my headwork done... bottom end is built already running on a 35r.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 11:43 AM   #247
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (25)
 
sabastian458's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 1,506

Drives: 2005 GTO 525RWHP- and still missing the Evo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin@AMS View Post
BC 280's have a rough idle and drive ability for the power gains. I ran the BC cams straight at zero on the cam gears to see how they would perform not being degreed in. The power was way down and they really idled and drove poorly. I would recommend the S2's, Kelford 272's or the FP5R's at that point.

I agree with this. The BC-280's have a agressive idle, driveablity is moderate. Only every once and awhile is there any hicups while driving. 2 simialarly modified stock turbo 8's, 1 with older GSC 272's and My Evo with BC-280's, the 280's pulled more in each gear change. I love them, but I wish they were more precise with the manufacturing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moreryce
My car owes me money...
Quote:
Originally Posted by vboy425
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monsta
...If youve got a turbo that sucks children off the sidewalk when you drive past- get a vendor CDI COP
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by meckert
Hmmmm...Kind of Like the old Audis..that use to accelerate into walls when in park..
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 12:32 PM   #248
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
turbo271's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Palatine, Chicago, IL
Posts: 200

Drives: 2004 WW EVO VIII (sold)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsychDr. HN$ View Post
for me it kinda come down to HKS 272 or BC 280's drop right in. GSC S2's make more power but REQUIRE springs and retainers. I prolly wont go any larer than a HTA 30R but more than likely I will do a HTA FP Green. Even if i did BC's which are the least expensive and powerful of the cams testing, I do realize than ANY cam would be better than the STOCKER.
I'm in the same boat as you. I will eventuall graduate up to either the FR Green or FR GT30R. I just want something I know is going to tag-team well with those turbos, but still be good with the stocker.
__________________
9.8 / AP/ Skunk2 CB & TP / TurboXS DP / HKS RS Intake / HKS SSQV BOV ver2 / Homemade Recirculation kit / Swift Spec R springs / Cusco ver2 underbrace / Black OEM Enkeis / Broken Front Bumber - GHETTO!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 12:35 PM   #249
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
turbo271's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Palatine, Chicago, IL
Posts: 200

Drives: 2004 WW EVO VIII (sold)

By the way the S3's look fantastic, but I'm guessing it wouldn't work so well on a stock head.
__________________
9.8 / AP/ Skunk2 CB & TP / TurboXS DP / HKS RS Intake / HKS SSQV BOV ver2 / Homemade Recirculation kit / Swift Spec R springs / Cusco ver2 underbrace / Black OEM Enkeis / Broken Front Bumber - GHETTO!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 12:40 PM   #250
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Paul Nelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Team English Racing
Posts: 3,244

Drives: Evolution 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo271 View Post
By the way the S3's look fantastic, but I'm guessing it wouldn't work so well on a stock head.

Very nice power band. I run them
__________________
Extreme Turbo Systems & English Racing Got me into the 8's

-Weight-2780 lbs with me and NHRA Safety Equipment

-1.3 60ft 128mph thru the 1/8th 8.9 et & 166mph (42R)

-Dynojet 1117whp 2.0 ETS 45R Turbo Kit

[b]Proud To Be Sponsored By

English Racing - Extreme Turbo Systems- GSC - Driven Innovations- Spark Tech- AMS
End of the year highlight video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTs-VhHfosk

NW Fastest 4G63
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 12:46 PM   #251
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (61)
 
evovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,225

Drives: Evo 8

I know AMS tested the S3 with GT35 but GSC said they dont suggest this cams on smaller that 42R.....

Will this be fine with my HTA37R?
What is the difference between the solid lifter against hydraulic on performance wise?
__________________

10.90@129mph(sunnoco 116)
best trap 135mph



PT6262


Tuned by Mark @ TTR


TurboTrix Racing
http://www.turbotrix.com/wordpress/

SparkTech Ignitions
http://www.sparktechignitions.net/
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 03:14 PM   #252
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (11)
 
Ph3n1x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,248

Drives: 05 Pum Pum Rider

Send a message via AIM to Ph3n1x Send a message via Yahoo to Ph3n1x
Good stuff with the S3's
__________________
No sig....sighhh
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 03:38 PM   #253
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (25)
 
sabastian458's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 1,506

Drives: 2005 GTO 525RWHP- and still missing the Evo.

It seems that the BC 280's had about the same power down low as the stockers and performed fairly well, had a tad bit more power earlier the some of the others.

Heck even if you had to redegree the cams some, it seems they are worth the $$
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moreryce
My car owes me money...
Quote:
Originally Posted by vboy425
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monsta
...If youve got a turbo that sucks children off the sidewalk when you drive past- get a vendor CDI COP
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by meckert
Hmmmm...Kind of Like the old Audis..that use to accelerate into walls when in park..
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 04:03 PM   #254
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (40)
 
wshihdnevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,427

Drives: '05 apex silver evo 8

Send a message via AIM to wshihdnevo
Quote:
Originally Posted by evovin View Post
I know AMS tested the S3 with GT35 but GSC said they dont suggest this cams on smaller that 42R.....

Will this be fine with my HTA37R?
What is the difference between the solid lifter against hydraulic on performance wise?


Thats why AMS did this test...? Looks like they would work fine.
__________________
Ported IX Turbo/Buddy Club 272/280/Magnus Street SMIM/Muse exhaust manifold/ETS Short Route UICP/LICP/4" MAFless intake/ETS 3.5" Exhaust/ETS 3" widetank fmic/Walbro 255/ACT HD/GM 3 port BCS/Speed Density on stock ECU

MidgetSpec&English Racing
ETS
EDRCrew
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2008, 04:05 PM   #255
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 388

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Are we going to see JUN 272s?
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ams, bottom, cam, cams, camshaft, combination, end, evo, idle, ix, magazine, modified, power, test, testing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0