borg Warner
Apr 28, 2008, 09:47 AM
#6
Account Disabled
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes here is a thread i started before i purchased!
spool characteristics is close to stock but making way more power!
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=325591
spool characteristics is close to stock but making way more power!
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=325591
Trending Topics
Jun 26, 2008, 08:06 PM
#8
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised that not many in the EVO camp run Bullseye Power...Huge in Honda and DSM community. When I get more $$, I'm gonna switch from PT61 to S362. Seems like the S258 and S362 are made for Evos.. Very similar to the Garrett GT30r and 35r variants, but slightly bigger. Anybody that run Borg Warner's wanna chime in on experiences??
very nice turbo.. man there loud and spool faster than any aftermarket turbo ive seen
Jun 27, 2008, 11:25 AM
#12
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tenn
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have run most of the BW's and they are nice units indeed, but I think the GT's still have the edge in most applications. I'm running a new hybrid Borg Warner that is Ball bearing.....its awesome. Give the spool up of the GT DBB units and the power of the BW.
Ask Mike that use to be with USP motorsports....he did some back to back testing on the GT versus the Borg Warner. I believe he blew up 3 of Bullseye's units on the dyno with just a handful of passes.
Ask Mike that use to be with USP motorsports....he did some back to back testing on the GT versus the Borg Warner. I believe he blew up 3 of Bullseye's units on the dyno with just a handful of passes.
Last edited by SmokinU; Jun 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM.
Jun 27, 2008, 03:54 PM
#13
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have run most of the BW's and they are nice units indeed, but I think the GT's still have the edge in most applications. I'm running a new hybrid Borg Warner that is Ball bearing.....its awesome. Give the spool up of the GT DBB units and the power of the BW.
Ask Mike that use to be with USP motorsports....he did some back to back testing on the GT versus the Borg Warner. I believe he blew up 3 of Bullseye's units on the dyno with just a handful of passes.
Ask Mike that use to be with USP motorsports....he did some back to back testing on the GT versus the Borg Warner. I believe he blew up 3 of Bullseye's units on the dyno with just a handful of passes.
3 blew on the dyno?? dang. Somebody need to make a kit using Borg warners...that'll be something fresh,.
Jun 29, 2008, 03:25 AM
#15
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glendale Heights, IL
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike Reichen tested a S374 vs. the Garrett GT 4294r. The S 374 actually spooled faster than the smaller 42R. He used the S374 when he won the Hot Rod standing mile at Maxton. He went 210mph and lifted the throttle for 2 seconds because of a strong side wind. He was running 38 psi on plane jane HKS 272's. Also where the BW's shine is at high boost. There compressor maps are more efficent at higher pressure ratios vs. Garrett. Last, but not least Brent Rau runs low 7's with a Borg Warner S374. FP has the S374's in stock, and I think they can get other models if requested.
Last edited by Flyin EVO 2; Jun 29, 2008 at 03:29 AM.
