Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

My E85 evo, Virtual Dyno #s vs. real Dyno #s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2011, 11:56 AM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nelson999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: near Sacramento CA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
My E85 evo, Virtual Dyno #s vs. real Dyno #s

so i had the chance to do a pull with my car yesterday hooked up to Virtual Dyno. this is about 2 weeks after the real Dyno tune was done. the temperature was almost the same on both days. so here are the results.

car: 2005 Evo MR, Stock Turbo, Stock Cams

cobb intake
Works Downpipe
RRE test pipe
HKS carbon TI catback
TurboXS FMIC
ETS LICP
PTE 1000cc injectors
walbro 255 fuel pump
crushed IX DV
peak boost of 29psi




virtualdyno in DynoJet mode, 405hp/405tq



virtualdyno in Mustang dyno mode, 353hp/353tq



and the Dyno sheet from my tuning session at FFtec on the Mustang dyno, 355hp/350tq


only a 2WHP difference on virtual mustang and the real mustang! i do have 18" volks on the car now, and had stock BBS when the car was on the real Dyno

Last edited by Nelson999; Dec 4, 2011 at 12:09 PM.
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:04 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
zeus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: manchester, new hampshire
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
more to back up the virtual dyno thanks for posting up.
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:07 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nelson999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: near Sacramento CA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
ya exactly, figured id post up for the VirtualDyno doubters
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:15 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
getsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Good Job once again VD proves to be scarily accurate, it appears on the mustang dyno comparison it makes power slightly earlier on the real dyno around 3500RPM.

Did they make use of the dyno brake, and comparison was in 3rd correct?
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:27 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
97EagleAwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ft Wayne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?

Awesome comparision and great info. How do you get files loaded into the program ?
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:28 PM
  #6  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Boostevo58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now I feel alot better about my numbers.
Old Dec 4, 2011, 12:32 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nelson999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: near Sacramento CA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Boostevo58
Now I feel alot better about my numbers.
whys that?
Old Dec 4, 2011, 03:09 PM
  #8  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Nelson999
whys that?
due to all the misinformed people on the forum he was prob brain washed the vd read high or something.. who knows. its the complete opposite for those who tested back to back.
Old Dec 4, 2011, 03:57 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
civicej8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: las vegas
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats really amazing right there,!
Old Dec 4, 2011, 05:31 PM
  #10  
Newbie
iTrader: (28)
 
khasal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In the car
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great to read OP. Thanks for the comparisons. That backs up my 404 whp on VD.
Old Dec 7, 2011, 09:18 AM
  #11  
Newbie
 
jordan4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very good info thanks for the post. Thats pretty amazing
Old Dec 7, 2011, 10:23 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
 
blackenedwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,630
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Virtual Dyno does seem to be scarily accurate compared to real dyno numbers... its surprising actually considering the variance of conditions since I doubt I have a truly flat/straight road in my entire state.
Old Dec 7, 2011, 01:58 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
JDavenport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbia, TN
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
My experience was about the same:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ing-limit.html

VD and the real dyno were very close. If you load accurate data into VD and do solid pulls on level ground, it just works. As an engineer that is an argument I have always made. Given controlled conditions, deriving power and torque from pull data is just math.

But as some have noted, the 'purists' and fanboys always want to nay-say the software approach.
Old Dec 7, 2011, 05:37 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
mikegsturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: new york
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a question what's up with getting pistons for this setup and cams with 10-1 pistons can you make more power with the stock 8 turbo and can you use the stock head gasket even is the block is decked ? Just wondering if there wold be a noticable difference compaired to this setup ??
Old Dec 7, 2011, 09:25 PM
  #15  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Rough_draft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In the River that Falls MA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice job Nelson!!


Quick Reply: My E85 evo, Virtual Dyno #s vs. real Dyno #s



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 PM.