Skunk 2 Intake Manifold

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 27, 2010, 11:54 AM

#16

still*boostn

Evolving Member

iTrader: (15)

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: Houston, TX

Posts: 422

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I really want to know/see more of tis skunk 2 testing!!! show us pics!!!

Reply Like

Oct 27, 2010, 12:03 PM

#17

Chris@nolimitmotors

Former Sponsor

Thread Starter

iTrader: (277)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: long island,NY

Posts: 2,091

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 03whitegsr

Wait, I thought this thing supposedly didn't even fit the EVO IX because of a water pipe or something? Then on any non-RS cars it hit the ABS unit or something?

It fits no problem. When they first came out there was a piece of casting that stuck out that had to be ground off to fit on a 9. They have since took care of that. It fits 100% on 9's and cars with ABS.

Reply Like

Oct 27, 2010, 01:06 PM

#18

FQ4OO

Evolving Member

Join Date: Mar 2008

Location: MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

Posts: 155

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Looks like the Shunk2 does the job.

What CF is the dyno set too?

Reply Like

Oct 27, 2010, 01:15 PM

#19

Chris@nolimitmotors

Former Sponsor

Thread Starter

iTrader: (277)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: long island,NY

Posts: 2,091

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by FQ4OO

Looks like the Shunk2 does the job.

What CF is the dyno set too?

1.15 which would be 15% not that it matters anyway in this case.

Reply Like

Oct 27, 2010, 01:43 PM

#20

fqjdmct9a

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Orlando, FL

Posts: 555

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

great results any pics of the manifold?

Reply Like

Oct 27, 2010, 02:03 PM

#21

Chris@nolimitmotors

Former Sponsor

Thread Starter

iTrader: (277)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: long island,NY

Posts: 2,091

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

I will get some pics up for you guys.

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 01:53 AM

#22

FQ4OO

Evolving Member

Join Date: Mar 2008

Location: MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

Posts: 155

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris@nolimitmotors

1.15 which would be 15% not that it matters anyway in this case.

for your comparison your right it doesn't matter, the gain from baseline to final run is still good.

Out of curiosity, why do you use anything other than CF1.0 or use weather station?

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 01:53 AM

#23

FQ4OO

Evolving Member

Join Date: Mar 2008

Location: MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

Posts: 155

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

+1 for pix!

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 04:43 AM

#24

warp9

Evolved Member

iTrader: (35)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Near the hOle

Posts: 1,499

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Decent results. Heres a pic for those that asked. Does the IC piping have to be modified at all??

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 05:24 AM

#25

sphinxof2006

Evolving Member

iTrader: (4)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: Bay Area

Posts: 226

Likes: 1

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

NLM you guys are awesome!

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 06:19 AM

#26

fqjdmct9a

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Orlando, FL

Posts: 555

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

can we get some pictures of how it looks on the car if possible?

Reply Like

Oct 28, 2010, 08:02 AM

#27

futurevowner

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: Jersey

Posts: 617

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by FQ4OO

for your comparison your right it doesn't matter, the gain from baseline to final run is still good.

Out of curiosity, why do you use anything other than CF1.0 or use weather station?

To make the numbers comparable to a dynojet, i've seen testing as high as 1.17 as the difference, and some shops use 1.2, its basically to make the numbers look better for the customer and closer to dj numbers. 1.15 is about average.