 |
|
Oct 19, 2009, 04:29 PM
|
#16
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 10)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Matthews/Greensboro
Posts: 572
Drives: 06 TB IX
|
Wow and I thought my car was a freak...
Great job!!!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 19, 2009, 08:05 PM
|
#17
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 11)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: manchester, new hampshire
Posts: 421
Drives: mitsubishi evo 8
|
WOW! i make slightly les hp at a lot more boost. that is a freak for sure. nice job
__________________
05 GSR
Mellon DLL 400whp 382wtq 93 pump only ~29PSI
VDR 5.71 (Dynojet Mode)=417WHP 405wtq 93 pump only ~29psi
Tuned by Mellon
|Built 2.0 liter short block (stock compression), stock head|
|FP Green turbo|Ebay 3" TBE with resonator|Buschur SS ported o2 housing|
|Buschur Jet Coated Stock NON ported Exhaust Manifold|
|Buschur Cone Filter|HKS 272 cams| PTE 680's|
|Walbro 255lph |ETS 3" FMIC| ETS LICP Stock UICP|Samco I/C Hoses|
|ACT clutch|ACT flywheel|APS DV|Joe P MBC|
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 19, 2009, 08:19 PM
|
#18
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbia, TN
Posts: 56
Drives: 06 Evo IX
|
How much do you attribute to the FP4R cams? The intercooler?
I'm thinking Cams, Intercooler, FP and Injectors and I should come see you again
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 06:45 AM
|
#19
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 146
Drives: 06 MR
|
Hmmm....I kinda wonder if the boost reading is off. 400 on 93 and lower than stock boost. Hmmm. That intercooler isn't doing much in the cooler temps. The stock flows good. Hard to believe cams, that intercooler, and tuning are getting 150 hp over stock on only 18 psi.
Thats a head scratcher for sure. I'd be curious to know what made all that power.
__________________
Authorized Amsoil dealer
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 07:16 AM
|
#20
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 28)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,395
Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDavenport
How much do you attribute to the FP4R cams? The intercooler?
I'm thinking Cams, Intercooler, FP and Injectors and I should come see you again 
|
cams, fmic and piping are doing wonders for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprx19
Hmmm....I kinda wonder if the boost reading is off. 400 on 93 and lower than stock boost. Hmmm. That intercooler isn't doing much in the cooler temps. The stock flows good. Hard to believe cams, that intercooler, and tuning are getting 150 hp over stock on only 18 psi.
Thats a head scratcher for sure. I'd be curious to know what made all that power.
|
the stock fmic flows like garbage, look at the size of the runners compared to the buschur race.
Kevin kept the stock fmic and went from 320-350's with GSC S2's, it's choking badly. He just swaped it out for my spare buschur race fmic, I expect he's going to jump into the 375+ area easily with a retune when we get time.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 07:30 AM
|
#21
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 11)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,706
Drives: EB IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
Now this was an interesting one, I told Garret we might not be able to make the power it should due to the stock fuel pump and stock injectors. We had the boost at 25psi and it was completely out of fuel by 5500rpm 115% IDC. We lowered the boost until he could make it to the limiter without running out of fuel and that ended up being 18psi. So the torque isn't that impressive but I was surprised to see that it still managed to make over 400awp on 93 octane. He's going to picked up a walbro and 1000cc injectors and come back for a re-tune, I suspect we might make more hp and we'll definitely make more torque.
|
Hmmm
I made 355 WHP (DJ) , had 110-115% IDC @ 11.5 AFR on 93 stock fuel pump , I just dont see there being 45 whp more fuel left in it
__________________
HKS intake/EBAY IC/3'' turboback/ECUflash(BigRic touch up)26psi GM 3 port
355HP/327TQ Dynojet
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 07:36 AM
|
#22
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 28)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,395
Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT
|
comparing dyno numbers isn't always useful and I've noticed a significant difference between some cars and how far they can go on the stock pump/injectors and others. As a rule of thumb the pump should be replaced right away so it's a non issue.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 07:43 AM
|
#23
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 11)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,706
Drives: EB IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
comparing dyno numbers isn't always useful and I've noticed a significant difference between some cars and how far they can go on the stock pump/injectors and others. As a rule of thumb the pump should be replaced right away so it's a non issue.
|
+1

it made a big diff in my tune , fuel map was in the higher 8's and now high 9's/lower 10's and IDC are down to 100-105% , afr 11.2 vs 11.5
__________________
HKS intake/EBAY IC/3'' turboback/ECUflash(BigRic touch up)26psi GM 3 port
355HP/327TQ Dynojet
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 07:46 AM
|
#24
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 28)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,395
Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT
|
sounds like you added a ton of fuel in the map to compensate for the weaknut pump. I turned down the boost instead and I suspect we're not going to see the same thing with his tune when he installs the pump/injectors. right now it's my normal fuel map for those mods + 5 fuel to bring the AFR down to where I want it. So it'll go a little richer but nothing too crazy. I'm not saying what you did is wrong, just a different approach to the issue
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 08:01 AM
|
#25
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 11)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,706
Drives: EB IX
|
^^
Replace "wrong" with "safe"
__________________
HKS intake/EBAY IC/3'' turboback/ECUflash(BigRic touch up)26psi GM 3 port
355HP/327TQ Dynojet
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 08:08 AM
|
#26
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 33)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hagerstown
Posts: 3,023
Drives: 04 EVO VIII - Tarmac
|
wow, impressive!!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 09:39 AM
|
#27
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 14)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silt, Colorado
Posts: 869
Drives: 03 EVO8, 05 R6
|
I suspect the car has a really strong motor as well. I'd be interested to see compression numbers.
__________________
03 Apex silver EVO VIII 12.25@113 1.83 60' @ 4800 ft
stock 9 turbo, stock ecu, stock block e-85
www.rcm-awd.com Colorado car club
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 09:49 AM
|
#28
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 56
Drives: 2006 IX MR
|
Wow, great numbers! Chris is an awesome tuner and a great guy. My car is at the same point where the stock fuel injectors are keeping it back.
Last edited by charon2123; Oct 20, 2009 at 09:51 AM.
Reason: Added word
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 01:47 PM
|
#29
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 146
Drives: 06 MR
|
Well regardless, awsome numbers.
__________________
Authorized Amsoil dealer
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 01:49 PM
|
#30
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: May 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 367
Drives: 06' EVO IX SE / 90' 5.0 GT
|
wow... im assuming the only relevant mod is the addition of the Fp4R cams? Interesting... i think i may have my new cam choice, lol!
__________________
06' IX SE - Inline Racing/Mellon Tuning GT3582r
HKS / ETS / Buschur / AMS / SHEPTRANS / AEM / VOLK
11 sec club (hopefully 10s soon!)
471whp / 373tq - 93 octane pumpgas (26psi)
551whp / 433tq - c16 racegas (35psi)
Tuned by Mellon
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
|
Tags
|
2006, dyno, e85, ecu, evo, evom, lancer, mellontuning, mitsubishi, psi, roms, settings, stock, tuning, turbo  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|