evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Dyno Tuning and Results
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 23, 2009, 04:59 PM   #1
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

Mellon Tuning stock EVO 8 turbo vs BBK Full vs FP HTA Green 93 octane

Owner: Eric
Username: EVOEMS
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Eric is a long time customer that's made the trip to me in Horn Lake, MS (just south of Memphis, TN) many times so I know his car pretty well and figured I would share some data with the community to better help people make a more informed decision on parts.

Model 2005 EVO8 6-speed

Mods:
Stock EVO 8 turbo 10.5 Turbine
23psi
Walbro FP
tbe
fmic
DLL 293/293 was an ugly 274/263 before the tune




Changes:
GSC S1 cams
DLL 363/335




Changes:
BBK Full turbo
29psi
test pipe
02 housing
ported manifold
SBR 3.5" FMIC
PTE 1000cc injectors
DLL 383/351



Changes:
Forced Performance HTA Green
30psi
Ported/Polished/Head 1mm Oversize valve
DLL 400/373

We did a baseline after fixing the AFR and the power was way down 357/336 @ 28psi so I had quite a bit of work to do on the timing map in particular and we raised the boost up 2psi to 30.




stock turbo and old setup vs HTA Green and current setup...seems the green didn't add much lag, still a great car for autox/road course/drag racing etc...and with the new head work I was able to add quite a bit more timing at the lower boost levels for much better part throttle response.

__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:02 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (14)
 
Chemwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,978

Drives: 2010 Bathurst Black Genesis Coupe V6 Track

How in the world did he get 363 whp after just adding S1 cams? That's exactly what I have but I only got 330. I'm so depressed now.
__________________
Tuned by Mellon

Old car = 2005 Evo VIII w/SSL (Gone but never forgotten) :(

TRSCCA
14 GS
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:02 PM   #3
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 265

Sweet. Thanks for some final numbers. Anyway to overlay the BBK and HTA graphs?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:03 PM   #4
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
leecavturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 938

Drives: 2003 evo8 gsr jdm

good work.
bet he wasn't happy with $/bhp with the bbk?
the gsc's gave great gain
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:05 PM   #5
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (43)
 
eve-slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,827

Drives: GG IX

So it seems the full BBK and HTA Green are about the same for power. Hard to say for sure cause of the head.
__________________
06 EVO GG IX
03 EVO RR VIII (She gone)
95 Red turbo Integra GS-R (She long gone)


RUSH GROUP DETAILING

MY IX GG
MY IX GG
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:08 PM   #6
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

I think that's a fair statement at least for this car...the gains could be from a combination of the head work and HTA Green. It was hotter outside when we tuned the BBK too. I was hoping for more from the new HTA Green, it seems it's going to take better fuel and more boost to get it anywhere near what the Red can do. My lowest HP FP Red customer has 415 and highest 450 on 93 octane and none of them had head work. One of them made 400 on 91 octane. But I think the HTA Green will spool quicker, probably better suited for Autox.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:09 PM   #7
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 265

Quote:
Originally Posted by eve-slow View Post
So it seems the full BBK and HTA Green are about the same for power. Hard to say for sure cause of the head.
And extra 1psi.

I would love to see a one turbo put on after the other for a completely identical test, but without someone willing to fork over the money, I doubt we will see anything like that.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:11 PM   #8
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

just to clarify, when we tuned the BBK Full 29psi is all we could do without making it unstable and causing knock. The head and HTA Green went on and the boost dropped to 28psi, We turned it up to 30psi and it's rock solid in back to back pulls and banging the gears.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:26 PM   #9
EvoM Moderator
Personal Sales Rating: (12)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uxbridge, MA
Posts: 2,728

Drives: WW Evo IX w/ SSL/SE, 2000 Sentra SE w/ SR20

can you post boost curves?

Great numbers, i would have expected a bit more torque up top.
__________________
-Mike

The Rules - love them

TephraMOD V7 - now serving 25x30 fuel and timing maps and Gear Dependent Boost Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by beavis820 View Post
turco is a damn fine mechanic without me
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:30 PM   #10
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
leecavturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 938

Drives: 2003 evo8 gsr jdm

chris have you ever had what we call valve float?
we mean as in not due to high rpm or aggressive cam profile but
because of tired/weak valve springs being overcome by boost.
a few ppl have had this here and either upgraded them or fitted doubles etc and
power was improved.
the symptons are not making any more power over a certain boost and lower than expected outputs for the spec when all mechanically/electrically seems sound.
mostly at 2bar+ boost
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:46 PM   #11
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (28)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 956

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

Well looks like I may be investing in a red now instead of the HTA green...
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc 417whp
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 05:50 PM   #12
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR Turco View Post
can you post boost curves?

Great numbers, i would have expected a bit more torque up top.
sorry we don't log boost

Quote:
Originally Posted by leecavturbo View Post
chris have you ever had what we call valve float?
we mean as in not due to high rpm or aggressive cam profile but
because of tired/weak valve springs being overcome by boost.
a few ppl have had this here and either upgraded them or fitted doubles etc and
power was improved.
the symptons are not making any more power over a certain boost and lower than expected outputs for the spec when all mechanically/electrically seems sound.
mostly at 2bar+ boost
interesting, I haven't run across that...well, I should say that I haven't noticed it.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 06:07 PM   #13
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (34)
 
gfng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 945

Drives: evo VII evo VII

great results chris

looks like the hta green is a great option

wonder what this same car would make on e-85 ..... (crazy power)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 06:09 PM   #14
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

I'd love to tune it on e85 but the stock shorty wouldn't appreciate it i suspect. The cams are smallish but maybe it would make upper 400's at full tilt
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2009, 06:15 PM   #15
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (34)
 
gfng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 945

Drives: evo VII evo VII

quiestion Chris , but off topic ......

the lag on this hta green is similar to the red ??? at least for what u felt and saw with this car ????
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2004, boost, e85, evo, fp, green, hp, hta, make, stock, tennessee, torque, tuning, turbo, video

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0