evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Dyno Tuning and Results
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 27, 2009, 09:04 AM   #76
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL - New Orleans
Posts: 4,768

Drives: Evo VIII/SVO Mustang/BMW E30 M3

Thanks for that Chris.

So everyone has a better understanding, the indicated load is a reflection of torque, while indicated airflow (Hz) is an reflection of power.
__________________
Ted B. Spec JAM Long Rod 2.0L - Headway Performance CNC Head & Valvetrain - DI Intake Manifold - 75mm Hypertune TB - HTA3582R Twin Scroll T4 - Machined 12mm lift Billet Cams - MPFab twinscroll T4 Manifold, TBE, UICP, LICP - MPFab Race FMIC - TiAl 44mm WG - Skunk2 Pro Cam Gears - FIC Bluemax 1250cc - FullBlown Dual 255lph - Synchronic BPV - Spark Tech COP Ignition - TRE Trans - Shep TC + LSD - SPEC Graphite Dual Disc
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2009, 03:17 PM   #77
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (9)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
denver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 434

Drives: 2003 EVO 8, '09 JETTA TDI 2009 GREEN CAR OF THE YEAR , '08 Outlander, '91 talon TSi, '03 Lancer OZ RIP!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfred View Post
IMHO, the only possible hinderance to running really big power with the stock ECU (say up to 800 whp) is the speed of the ECU. Its pretty fast, and its definitely not a problem for anything I've seen in the 500 whp range, but just tossing that out as a possible limitation. The other commonly discussed limitations such as the MAF and table scalings are relatively easily overcome, especially with all the ECU hacking going on these days.
Kind of a older post, but I read it, and dont understand why.

Why would HP have anything to with processing speed of the computer? It uses the same equations as it uses for lower HP. It seems to me the processing speed of the computer would be based on maximum engine rpm not HP. Is it that the total acceleration of the crank exceeds the the speed of the processor? In that case, when the engine is reved under no load, that is the case of maximum crank acceleration which would yield the most computing power if the above statement is correct.

I the past I worked on a project where we ran out of ECU processing speed at 21,000 rpm, but not a hp limit.
__________________
Are you in the North Texas area? http://forums.evolutionm.net/north-t...club-ntec-303/

SAVING THE PLANET GAINING 50HP AT A TIME....... CORN FED!!!!!!!!!!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2009, 12:52 PM   #78
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
precisionpsi9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 44

Drives: is300

evo 9 built 2.0 ross pistons/oliver rods
ams head
kelford 272
stock intake mainfold n T/B
ams 850r
pump gas
stock ecu
1000cc
28psi
550hp 430tq
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:14 PM   #79
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (29)
 
Creamo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,646

Drives: '03 CT9A / '06 MDX / '07 CBR600RR

Not the highest on DLL, but pretty good for a 50-trim I like to think

__________________
Shearer HTA3582 / Magnus V5 / GSC S2 Cams / PPI 65mm TB / Dejon 4" Intake / AMSoil 4090 Filter
FIC 1450cc Injectors / Perrin Fuel Rail / BR Dual Pumps / TiAL Q BOV / APS Catback
ETS UICP / Nisei FMIC / HKS DLI2 / Hallman MBC / E85

Speed Density via EcuFlash


Next: Wiseco 1400HD Pistons / Howards Rods / MAP Stage 4 Head / A1 L19 Studs / ACT 6-Puck
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:49 PM   #80
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (46)
 
CBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: york, pa 17402
Posts: 4,087

Drives: LOT's'O'EVO's

Send a message via AIM to CBRD
not sure if we posted,

we did 499.7 whp on our mustang dyno on stock ecu on pump gas with our own car... gt37R..

this was almost 2 years ago, and we about to break our own record with a new build we are doing.

hoping for 530whp.

cb
__________________
www.cbrdspeedfactory.com
Immaculately prepared facility... State of the Art equipment..
Proven Motorsports Background.. ALMS, Grand-Am, Open wheel...
www.ChadBlock.com

CBRD Radiators, BBK Turbos, Intercoolers, EVO X parts, and CBRD Time Attack EVO backed by Advan

The standard just became standard. Meeting expectations is now not acceptable... we must always exceed them.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:54 PM   #81
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Meeh Lucky IX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 99

Drives: 2006 Evolution IX MR

Wasup guy's got more power outa the setup with a few new parts and some tweaks we'll be hitting the track over this weekend either at the test n tune saturday or cmi on sundayto see what she'll do heres the break down.

Evo9 MR
Stock Block
Stock ECU
Stock MAF
Fuel: E85 + Meth
513.6whp
433.9wtq
@30psi of boost
Low Reading Mustang Dyno

MODS:

Engine:
ETS PT61mm Super Value Turbo Kit
Cosworth M2 Camshafts
Cosworth Head Gasket
Cosworth Valve Springs
ARP Headstuds
Motor Mounts

Fuel System:
Buschur Double Pumper
Deatschwerks 1600cc Injectors
Aeromotive FPR
SMC Methonol Kit

Intercooler / Intake:
ETS 3.5in Widetank Intercooler
Injen Intake / UICP Greddy RS Bov

Exhaust:
Greddy Full Ti
Invidia Test Pipe

Drivetrain:
Quarter Master Twin Disk Clutch
Attached Images
File Type: jpg EIP DYNO SHEET 513WHP 434WTQ 2.JPG (99.1 KB, 0 views)
__________________
Eip Racing
Piloted By: Chris N.
2006 Evolution IX MR

Quarter Mile ET: TBA

Mustang Dyno
513.6awhp @ 6750rpm
433.9awtq @ 5750rpm
@ 30psi of boost

Last edited by Meeh Lucky IX; Mar 3, 2009 at 07:58 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 5, 2009, 12:50 PM   #82
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (128)
 
Boost3dxEvO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,399

Drives: MR

Send a message via AIM to Boost3dxEvO Send a message via MSN to Boost3dxEvO
Nice ^ Lets keep these thread going!
__________________
Mellon Rox my Sox yo.

www.mellontuning.com

Spark Tech Is giving me that AMAZING Fire Power!!!

www.sparktechignitions.net
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 6, 2009, 11:07 AM   #83
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (48)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
jid2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Posts: 2,368

Drives: 03 EVO VIII White

Question for the DLL guys, have you weighted your car and entered the correct value?

I just weighted my car and it's 3100 lbs without driver, the DLL preset is about 3300 lbs. So I lost 20 whp after the adjustment!
__________________
jid2 Built: Now featuring E85 super fuel
2.3L - GT3076R .63A/R, ETS equal length, Kelford 272's, BC valve springs, 1mm O/S valves, FIC BM 1450's, Full-Blown dual Walbros, Buschur IC, jid2 intake, airbox, IC pipes, APS BOV, TBE, ACT HDSS, Stock ECU, 28 psi 466hp/420 ft-lb...
Build Thread

Binary Lowered Recaro Seats, Girodisc 2-Piece, brake ducting, ST43's, SS lines and ATE Superblue, KW V3's 8K/10K, jid2 flat-bottom, adjustable splitter and aero, 18x9.5 +40 NT03's 265/18/35 BFG R1's
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1993, 50, 591, block, boost, cams, cosworth, dyno, ecu, evo, head, kelford, mustang, octane, stock, tune, tuned, whp

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0