 |
Nov 4, 2009, 12:25 AM
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 32
Drives: '06 Evo MR, '09 MS3
|
Need some hardware help
I'm going to be building a new system for my Evo here in a couple months, and so far I only know what deck I want, and what sub/amp combo I'm going to use:
Alpine CDA-9887
JL W3 12" sub
JL 500/1v2 amp
But what should I use in the doors? I was thinking a component set for the front, and just higher end replacements in the back, but what sets, and what amp? I listen mostly to rock in all its forms, from classic to metal.
__________________
'06 RR Evo IX MR
Mods:
RMR CF Steering Column Gauge Pod | Triple 60MM Dash Pod | Blox Front Engine Mount | AMS Shifter Bushings | AMS Shifter Cable Bushings | Defi Gauges |
'09 CWP MS3
Mods:
Dashhawk | CP-E SRI | HKS SSQV | Darkstar BSD | SU Shifter Bushings | CP-E Rear MM | Kenwood DNX8120 | CP-E Turbo Inlet | Demon Eyes | CP-E Catless DP | H&R Springs | CP-E FMIC | Screw-on Oil Filter Conversion | Prosport Sandwich Plate | Koni Yellows | CP-e HPFP | Cobb AP |
|
|
Offline
|
|
Nov 4, 2009, 06:16 AM
|
#2
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYS
Posts: 2,007
Drives: IX SE
|
May I ask why you decided on a 9887? I'm asking, because it doesn't sound like you plan to utilize its DSP-driven tuning features.
As for speakers, you need to go to a store, listen to a few models and see what you like. I'd suggest ditching the rears, altogether.
Keep in mind that the Evo is loud, very loud. The system may sound fine while the car is standing still, but it's a different story when it's on the move, encountering a series of random cancellation below the mids, and greatly obscuring detail and overall resolution everywhere else. As such, you need to make a choice at this stage of system composition. Do you want to go all-out by essentially overpowering the car's inherent limitations and tuning the rig to forgo its environmental constants, or are you willing to settle for sound quality that isn't necessarily better than what you have now - mostly, just louder. The 9887 has everything you needs to tune the system. The question is, how comfortable are you doing it? Judging by your questions, you may be better-off with the latter option.
If you do decide to upgrade your door speakers, keep in mind that the doors will need to be deadened and sealed. I'd strongly suggest reading everything here before proceeding. Good luck.
__________________
VDR5.6 EvoM Comparator - 347/321
STM Mustang Dyno - 320/302
|
|
Offline
|
|
Nov 5, 2009, 11:00 AM
|
#3
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYS
Posts: 2,007
Drives: IX SE
|
No response, not even a quick thanks? I'm really glad I took the time.
__________________
VDR5.6 EvoM Comparator - 347/321
STM Mustang Dyno - 320/302
|
|
Offline
|
|
Nov 5, 2009, 01:16 PM
|
#4
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 32
Drives: '06 Evo MR, '09 MS3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJF
No response, not even a quick thanks? I'm really glad I took the time. 
|
Ouch :-(
Lol sorry, I don't come to the forums too much, except to check in on the regional.
Anyway, I chose that deck because, as I understand, it's one of the best single dins out there right now, and it's easily in my budget.
As for personal taste in my setup, I'm a freak about quality. Even if the cars mechanical sounds and lack of sufficient sound deadening make a good system pointless, I'd still put it in.
Also, I'm not against the idea of adding things like dynamat or the cell foam insulation for better audio.
And thanks for the kickass response, I don't often get detail like that when I ask questions!
__________________
'06 RR Evo IX MR
Mods:
RMR CF Steering Column Gauge Pod | Triple 60MM Dash Pod | Blox Front Engine Mount | AMS Shifter Bushings | AMS Shifter Cable Bushings | Defi Gauges |
'09 CWP MS3
Mods:
Dashhawk | CP-E SRI | HKS SSQV | Darkstar BSD | SU Shifter Bushings | CP-E Rear MM | Kenwood DNX8120 | CP-E Turbo Inlet | Demon Eyes | CP-E Catless DP | H&R Springs | CP-E FMIC | Screw-on Oil Filter Conversion | Prosport Sandwich Plate | Koni Yellows | CP-e HPFP | Cobb AP |
|
|
Offline
|
|
Nov 5, 2009, 04:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYS
Posts: 2,007
Drives: IX SE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by F0RSAKEN
Anyway, I chose that deck because, as I understand, it's one of the best single dins out there right now, and it's easily in my budget.
|
It is a very good deck, mostly, due to its tuning features. I run a 9887 and I've compared it directly to a 9873 - a deck less than half its cost. There was a difference in sound quality, but it was very subtle, almost nonexistent on a greater scale. I guess I'm trying to say that if you're not going to use 9887's x-overs, its PEQ and DSP, there's no real advantage to it. OTOH, if you feel like you may want to take the system further at a later date, might as well get a 9887 to begin with.
Quote:
As for personal taste in my setup, I'm a freak about quality. Even if the cars mechanical sounds and lack of sufficient sound deadening make a good system pointless, I'd still put it in.
Also, I'm not against the idea of adding things like dynamat or the cell foam insulation for better audio.
|
Take a very good look at the site I link'd in my other post. Don Sambook, the man behind sounddeadenershowdown.com, is the authority on deadening. His methodology, as well as his products, are the state of the art in the field.
Quote:
|
And thanks for the kickass response, I don't often get detail like that when I ask questions!
|
__________________
VDR5.6 EvoM Comparator - 347/321
STM Mustang Dyno - 320/302
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|