evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Advanced > Engine/Turbo
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 2, 2008, 07:37 PM   #1
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 17

Drives: 03 ZO6, 06 EVO IX

Stock 2.0L EVO IX with GT35R turbo kits come in..

Planning to go to the next level with the car 06 evo ix with stock motor. Im liking the HTA 35r kits.. can you guys please post any DYNOGRAPHS, track times, any info/vids, experiences, appreciated on 35R on STOCK 2.0 motors..
__________________
2003 ZO6
Heads/Cam 346 LS6 Factory shortblock!
498rwhp 427rwtq
600/600+ on the bottle


2006 EVO IX
Intake and Fuel pump only car.
313awhp 336awtq on dyno dynamics at "The Shop CT"
Tuned by the master Al Dynoflash.

Planning GT35R kit...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 07:47 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,324

Drives: 05 Evo8 SSL

Check out mellon's car.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 08:15 PM   #3
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
ep3a2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 63

Drives: 2005 Wicked White Evo8

i'm quite sure that a gt35r would be fun to have on a stock motor but it would not be the safest idea in regards to longterm useage. Unless you like the sound of Boooom, clink clink, burrrrr plipppll!!
__________________
My Evo > Yours
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 11:07 PM   #4
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (8)
 
esevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 613

Drives: WW IX RS

Send a message via AIM to esevo
Look at going twin scroll. AFI makes a great kit. It will be the most streetable. I have had a gt35r on stock block. I wish for stock I would have gone 20G at the time. In your case BBK or FPRED. Unless you plan in the future to build your block.

Its not that the stock block cant handle it, it just that the turbo will never see its full potential therefore making it a waste of time and money. You will only see true gains with a motor that can handle its power/high boost long term.

Same goes for big cams, without head work/porting, your not going to see full gains that the cams could have.

Also Race Gas, without tuning you will never see the true limit of the fuel.

But if you are planing on upgrading the motor why not, I would still stay twinscroll for response.

Good Luck

Evan Smith
__________________
Full build in the making!!!

MANY PARTS FOR SALE:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/sale-pa...ml#post6471348
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 11:57 AM   #5
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
booster9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: lewisville TX
Posts: 336

Drives: 06 GG evo 9, 09 RG lancer GTS

+2 im mostly stock and would like dyno results
im hoping it will last till next xmas so i can stroke that sucker out!! 2.3 hta35r = pretty badass little toy!
__________________
EVOLUTION DYNAMICS built and tuned
516hp 430tq @ 32psi -on stock block
ams 2.3L bottom FP top end, no dyno yet
Race it, Break it, Fix it, Repeat

xbox gamertag: TickleMehP1ckle -- on MW2 alllll dayyy long!
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2008, 02:36 PM   #6
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraZee EVO View Post
Planning to go to the next level with the car 06 evo ix with stock motor. Im liking the HTA 35r kits.. can you guys please post any DYNOGRAPHS, track times, any info/vids, experiences, appreciated on 35R on STOCK 2.0 motors..
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=...pr&view=videos

I have some vids of my car in action with the HTA35R .63 which I regulate to 30psi on 93 octane and 500awhp

I just upgraded to the buschur 2.0L, stage 3 head and BF 272 cams and picked up another 100awhp on pump and now I've gone to the HTA86 turbo.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2008, 12:26 AM   #7
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 17

Drives: 03 ZO6, 06 EVO IX

Quote:
Originally Posted by ep3a2 View Post
i'm quite sure that a gt35r would be fun to have on a stock motor but it would not be the safest idea in regards to longterm useage. Unless you like the sound of Boooom, clink clink, burrrrr plipppll!!
what does that have to do with turbo sizing?
just run less boost to make a safer power level is all you have to do is avoid that noise your talking about lol.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2008, 12:29 AM   #8
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 17

Drives: 03 ZO6, 06 EVO IX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning View Post
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=...pr&view=videos

I have some vids of my car in action with the HTA35R .63 which I regulate to 30psi on 93 octane and 500awhp

I just upgraded to the buschur 2.0L, stage 3 head and BF 272 cams and picked up another 100awhp on pump and now I've gone to the HTA86 turbo.
thank you very much for your info.
HTA should help with any lag. they say I should have full spool 3400-4000 on a 2.0
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2008, 07:01 AM   #9
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraZee EVO View Post
thank you very much for your info.
HTA should help with any lag. they say I should have full spool 3400-4000 on a 2.0
more like 4500-5000 on a 2.0 with the HTA 35R

I saw 10psi by 3500 and 20psi by 4500 then it would jump up to my 30psi set boost quickly after that.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2008, 06:13 PM   #10
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
 
20gmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: hershey pa/williamsport
Posts: 480

Drives: 06 gg mr

im using a precision pt 61 turbo wich is vary similar to a 35r. Full boost is around 5k. Im making 442 on a mustang dyno. I ran an 11.6 at 120. My car has the 6 speed tranny wich is hurting my trap speed. Ps I have 64k miles now and she is holden up like a CHAMP!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HobieKopek View Post
Technicallly it's French.

It's "douche".
GARAGE / EBAY turbo kit 428whp,350wtq. .......My EVO has a drinking problem

442whp CBRD Mustang Dynp 376 wtq

NEW NUMBERS 480whp 370 wtq Thanks to BLOUCH TURBO and CBRD!!!!

Next setup is in the works .....stay tuned

11.6 @ 120 mph....... IN A 6 SPEED
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2008, 04:41 PM   #11
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ocean County, NJ
Posts: 8

Drives: 06 TB IX

Full Race!!!

i have been on a stock motor for some time now using GT35r type turbos. The stock motor is definitely reliable at moderate boost levels. I have been fortunate enough to have experienced the twinscroll turbos Full Race is offering. Borgwarner's new offerings provide a great alternative to Garrett equivalents, while also being cost effective.

Twinscroll makes those bigger turbos more livable, the transient response is
impressive to say the least. I am able to get full spool around 4200 rpm while creating the same peak power as single scroll turbos. If drivability is a focus rather than 1/4 mile peak power, look into the twinscrolls Full Race is offering.

Also I believe there is a sale on there kits
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 15, 2008, 07:39 AM   #12
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (30)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,631

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

Quote:
Originally Posted by ofb73 View Post
i have been on a stock motor for some time now using GT35r type turbos. The stock motor is definitely reliable at moderate boost levels. I have been fortunate enough to have experienced the twinscroll turbos Full Race is offering. Borgwarner's new offerings provide a great alternative to Garrett equivalents, while also being cost effective.

Twinscroll makes those bigger turbos more livable, the transient response is
impressive to say the least. I am able to get full spool around 4200 rpm while creating the same peak power as single scroll turbos. If drivability is a focus rather than 1/4 mile peak power, look into the twinscrolls Full Race is offering.

Also I believe there is a sale on there kits
got any data we can see?
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane with stock ecu and mas

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85 with stock ecu & mas
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 15, 2008, 08:08 AM   #13
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (11)
 
Ph3n1x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,250

Drives: 05 Pum Pum Rider

Send a message via AIM to Ph3n1x Send a message via Yahoo to Ph3n1x
Quote:
Originally Posted by ep3a2 View Post
i'm quite sure that a gt35r would be fun to have on a stock motor but it would not be the safest idea in regards to longterm useage. Unless you like the sound of Boooom, clink clink, burrrrr plipppll!!
What evidence do you have to support this. I've had a 35r type turbo for almost a year of abuse and no issues. If you know what you are doing and take care of the car, you have nothing to worry about.
__________________
No sig....sighhh
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 15, 2008, 08:14 AM   #14
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (24)
 
xiaoni420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 1,667

Drives: Evo IX

Send a message via AIM to xiaoni420
Larger 35R type turbos FTW. I will never go any smaller.
__________________
DTMotorsport
www.dtminc.com
571-283-3166

ExtremeTurboSystems
www.extremeturbosystems.com
360-263-3748
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 15, 2008, 08:24 AM   #15
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (11)
 
Ph3n1x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,250

Drives: 05 Pum Pum Rider

Send a message via AIM to Ph3n1x Send a message via Yahoo to Ph3n1x
Don't let the Red fanatics hear you...^
__________________
No sig....sighhh
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
06, 14, 2006, complete, evo, gt35, gt35r, ix, kit, mile, power, stage, stock, turbo, turbos

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0