Ugly rough fuel map
#1
Ugly rough fuel map
Hi guys,
I want some feedback on my fuel map. It's not done but I don't like the shape it's taking. There are areas where the values in the cells a far apart from each other in order to get the same or close actual AFR from wideband.... it seems it wants to be rough.
What is the best workflow for tuning on the street? Do you guys use map tracer in evoscan to make tuning changes or do you look at the raw csv log and make changes based on looking at that in ecuflash?
I want some feedback on my fuel map. It's not done but I don't like the shape it's taking. There are areas where the values in the cells a far apart from each other in order to get the same or close actual AFR from wideband.... it seems it wants to be rough.
What is the best workflow for tuning on the street? Do you guys use map tracer in evoscan to make tuning changes or do you look at the raw csv log and make changes based on looking at that in ecuflash?
#3
I just got my 2.3L running a few days ago so I'm working on the tune now using my old 2.0L tune as a base. I've pulled timing almost everywhere, and lowered boost. It's 10:1 on CA 91 octane + meth.
Is it normal for a fuel map to look rough like mine or am I doing something wrong?
Why do you and other tuners prefer to look at the raw log? Isn't it more difficult/time consuming or does map tracer not yield good results?
#5
So is it ok to leave my MAF scaling stock even with a 3" hardpipe intake, 2.3L, etc. ??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboTylerIX
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
15
Nov 3, 2013 10:49 PM