 |
Oct 20, 2009, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 4,346
Drives: 06 Rally Red MR
|
Speed Density airflow difference
I couldnt find the thread where I talked about this car before, so I decided to make one and show the power difference. I am also going to add the logs from tuning this car at the time to show what we were running into.
June/July-
At 26psi with a custom cold air 3" MAF setup the car made 480.39 and this was at the edge of timing (intermittent 1s and 2s). Taking the filter off with no changes to the tune (open turbo) it immediately picked up power and went to 493.09. It was late so we left, came back the next morning early and made some pulls. We installed a 4" filter pipe assembly and were able to get 2 more degrees into it and ended up at 512.
Logs to follow.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 03:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Near Water
Posts: 197
Drives: 04 EVO
|
So you switched to SD (stock ECU) and these were the gains from just pulling the Maf out of the equation? Impressive
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:10 PM
|
#3
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 166
|
Interesting. My gains were much smaller but I am also on a stock turbo and unfortunately I added a downpipe between track visits. With similar air going from MAF to SD and from stock downpipe to a 3" downpipe I gained 2.4mph in the quarter mile. I would guess 5-10 hp on a stock turbo style car.
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:19 PM
|
#4
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 4,346
Drives: 06 Rally Red MR
|
Dave posted earlier about 55whp from removing a MAF and fixing/replacing a BOV, so I wanted to share that we have seen very similar gains (well MAF removal) to back him up.
On the stock turbo we have seen a best of 11whp from switching to SD without cams, and one car that really seems to have picked up about 15whp over where an S2'd VIII would normally otherwise be.
0x, your 2.4 would be about 25whp going by the old rule of thumb so your guess of 5-10whp seems about right to me.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Near Water
Posts: 197
Drives: 04 EVO
|
^ John, the 55 HP David gained were not from the switch to SD as he had already switched to the AEm and documented those gains. He said (once the AEM was in) once he switched the BOV and intake pipe he then realized another 55 HP.
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:37 PM
|
#6
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,138
Drives: EVO 8, E46 BMW
|
Oh, so you added a 4" intake and picked up power over the open turbo?
In David's thread, I thought you were saying just some extra tuning on the open turbo got you up to 510 WHP.
I'd still like to see an AEM vs. a Speed Density patched stock ECU shootout.
All out power...
And driveability/fuel economy...
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:48 PM
|
#7
|
|
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: ( 3)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,599
Drives: WW EvoX GSR
|
good stuff.
SD was always going to benefit big turbo setups more than stock setups..
__________________
AUDM Black Evo IX 07 spec - writeoff thanks to someone that doesn't understand what a STOP sign is!
AUDM Yellow Evo IX - writeoff thanks to me rolling it at the Phillip Island Grand Prix Circuit :(
AUDM White Evo X - Powered by Colby@Tactrix, Richard@Aquamist
TephraMOD V7 - ECU mods AltMap, NLTS, KnockLight, Valet, Boost Mods, BIGMAP + more
yes - I have given up emptying my Inbox
Michael Jackson - RIP!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 04:52 PM
|
#8
|
|
Account Disabled
Personal Sales Rating: ( 44)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,534
|
Nice comparison. Looks like we've seen similar experiences.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 05:07 PM
|
#9
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 4,346
Drives: 06 Rally Red MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
Oh, so you added a 4" intake and picked up power over the open turbo?
In David's thread, I thought you were saying just some extra tuning on the open turbo got you up to 510 WHP.
I'd still like to see an AEM vs. a Speed Density patched stock ECU shootout.
All out power...
And driveability/fuel economy...
|
Our 4" intakes arent very restrictive. The 510/512 (darn my semi faulty memory) would have happened open turbo but I dont typically like running turbos open. The other thing is putting the filter on it moves the inlet out of the path of the hot air coming off the radiator and everything under the header/WG dump.
Intake-
Vs the 3" it had-
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 06:24 PM
|
#10
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 166
|
I should note that I'm still using the stock rubber intake snorkel. I just bought a PVC reducer from Lowes to replace the MAF, it is a $3 part, works great.
My BOV isn't leaking to 28psi during a boost leak test. Are you seeing a power gain just switching out a seemingly non leaking BOV? I'm running the stock metal evo IX BOV, not crushed, no gus mod, doesn't seem to need it.
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 20, 2009, 08:02 PM
|
#11
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 1,350
Drives: 2006 JDM Evo IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0xDEAD
I should note that I'm still using the stock rubber intake snorkel. I just bought a PVC reducer from Lowes to replace the MAF, it is a $3 part, works great.
My BOV isn't leaking to 28psi during a boost leak test. Are you seeing a power gain just switching out a seemingly non leaking BOV? I'm running the stock metal evo IX BOV, not crushed, no gus mod, doesn't seem to need it.
|
my stock evo ix BOV leaked at 10 psi - yes i pressure tested it.
i replaced it and it was an instant improvement. to justify it on my DD map i could only get 10/11 psi on WG boost, when i changed BOVs i got 12 psi. NOTE: i tightened some IC piping as well, but the BOV was leaking badly as per my test.
nice thread Aaron, i am currently looking for a neat MAFless intake setup for the stock turbo. if you got one let me know.
-Ravaal
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 21, 2009, 08:58 AM
|
#12
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,964
Drives: 05 Evo8 SSL
|
Hrm. I have s spare maf housing, gutting the hell out of it would be a cool sleeper look and potentially see the same benifits (on a stock/stock appearing turbo setup).
Awesome dyno numbers Aaron! I've been waiting for info like this. Def tempting.
|
|
Online
|
|
Nov 20, 2009, 01:51 PM
|
#13
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 4,346
Drives: 06 Rally Red MR
|
Guess it was actually the end of May that we did this test not June/july.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53 PM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
Tags
|
aem, air, car, density, evo, flow, grand, maf, mass, prix, set, speed, tuning  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|