evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > EcuFlash
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 6, 2009, 07:47 PM   #226
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Logic....did you remove the EVAP stuff as well???

Question: Can you dive a little deeper into the "Idle Stability Timing Control" table? I as because on the 94170008 the settings are WAY different from the 9653. Also there is still one section of it that is unknown.

I ask because I am curious if this table can get the car to get to it's idle setting faster, thus curing the 2K rev.

What are your theories on the 2k rev?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 08:25 PM   #227
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
My Garage
 
logic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aurora, IL USA
Posts: 733

Drives: 96530006

Send a message via ICQ to logic Send a message via AIM to logic Send a message via MSN to logic Send a message via Yahoo to logic
The FPR and EGR solenoids and lines, as well as evap canister and related items, are all long gone, with the EGR port plugged at the head. Everything is physically removed.

In my last round of changes (which accompanied getting rid of the 2000 RPM idle), I finally got back around to disabling lean spool (FBA bit 0), completely zeroed out the "Warmup Retard Control" table, copied the open loop load and throttle #1 and #2 tables from 96940011, and made a few final tweaks to "Initial Cranking IPW vs Coolant Temp" to help with cranking.

I'd probably be looking at either the "Warmup Retard Control" (ie. "Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs. Coolant Temp") or "Open Loop Load/Throttle" tables as good candidates for being the cause of the problem.
__________________
-Ed
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
My cars: Evo, WRX wagon, 2g DSM, 1g DSM
Learning: Evo ECU Wiki
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 08:59 PM   #228
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

So my only change tonight is that I made the Open Loop Load 1 & 2 match my original 94170008 rom. Test to come.

As for setting the open loop change over point....I don't seem to have that table. Can someone post the XML for me?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:24 PM   #229
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
My Garage
 
logic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aurora, IL USA
Posts: 733

Drives: 96530006

Send a message via ICQ to logic Send a message via AIM to logic Send a message via MSN to logic Send a message via Yahoo to logic
Here's the definition I have for 96530006:
PHP Code:
<scaling name="LT Trim Hz" units="Hz" toexpr="x*6.25" frexpr="x/6.25" format="%.2f" min="0" max="1593.75" inc="6.25" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
<
table name="Closed Loop - LT Trim Control" category="Fuel" address="35e5" type="2D" level="2" scaling="LT Trim Hz">
    <
table name="Conditions" type="Static Y Axis" elements="4">
    <
data>Low -> Mid</data>
    <
data>Mid -> Low</data>
    <
data>Mid -> High</data>
    <
data>High -> Mid</data>
    </
table>
</
table
For the record, I haven't touched these settings (haven't needed it).
__________________
-Ed
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
My cars: Evo, WRX wagon, 2g DSM, 1g DSM
Learning: Evo ECU Wiki
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:34 PM   #230
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

That isn't the one I was speaking of....I am looking for the "Min Temp For Closed Loop" table.

We can use it to make the car never use close loop if we want.

I think this is it....I created this from the 94170015

<table name="Min Coolant Temp for Closed Loop" category="Global Fuel Settings" address="15aa" type="1D" scaling="Temp"/>

It appears to be working in EcuFlash. The temp is 32* F.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:37 PM   #231
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 883

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Appauldd View Post
So my only change tonight is that I made the Open Loop Load 1 & 2 match my original 94170008 rom. Test to come.

As for setting the open loop change over point....I don't seem to have that table. Can someone post the XML for me?
Paul, the open loop change over point is the open loop load 1 & 2 tables, whatever rpm/load axis is listed in the table is when the map transitions to open loop... I am not to sure how the open loop throttle 1 & 2 play into the scheme though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by logic View Post
Here's the definition I have for 96530006:
PHP Code:
<scaling name="LT Trim Hz" units="Hz" toexpr="x*6.25" frexpr="x/6.25" format="%.2f" min="0" max="1593.75" inc="6.25" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
<
table name="Closed Loop - LT Trim Control" category="Fuel" address="35e5" type="2D" level="2" scaling="LT Trim Hz">
    <
table name="Conditions" type="Static Y Axis" elements="4">
    <
data>Low -> Mid</data>
    <
data>Mid -> Low</data>
    <
data>Mid -> High</data>
    <
data>High -> Mid</data>
    </
table>
</
table
For the record, I haven't touched these settings (haven't needed it).
Logic, I believe Paul was talking about open loop load 1 & 2... I could be wrong though...
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:39 PM   #232
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Sorry....I meant the Min Temperature for Closed loop.....I apologize for the confusion.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:39 PM   #233
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 883

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Appauldd View Post
That isn't the one I was speaking of....I am looking for the "Min Temp For Closed Loop" table.

We can use it to make the car never use close loop if we want.

I think this is it....I created this from the 94170015

<table name="Min Coolant Temp for Closed Loop" category="Global Fuel Settings" address="15aa" type="1D" scaling="Temp"/>

It appears to be working in EcuFlash. The temp is 32* F.
If you change all the load % values in the open loop load tables to 0 it will never go into closed loop either...
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:43 PM   #234
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 883

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Appauldd View Post
Sorry....I meant the Min Temperature for Closed loop.....I apologize for the confusion.
Here it is for 96530706

PHP Code:
<table name="Min Coolant Temp for Closed Loop" category="Global Fuel Settings" address="15aa" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Temp"/> 
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:50 PM   #235
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Woo Hoo....I derived my first piece of XML. I am so proud of myself.

Anyway,

It seems like we all have resolved any cold start & cold drivability issues. The problem now is an annoyance of the RPM climing to 2K after cold start. It does settle after a few seconds.

As I stated earlier about the Idle Stability Timing control......could the sensitivity or possibly the unknown portion of the table affect how quickly the car finds it's base idle settings????
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 09:58 PM   #236
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 883

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

I meant to mention that Paul, I switched the Idle stability timing control back to stock, I think 128 vice 146 what you had mentioned earlier also when I did my final change...
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 10:00 PM   #237
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Are you still getting the 2K rev?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2009, 10:08 PM   #238
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

In 96940011 the Idle Stablilty Timing Control (ISTC) has the following...

Sensitivity = 91 Timing limit = 10 Untested = 94

Where our v7 and the 9417xxxx roms have the following...

Sensitivity = 128 Timing limit = 8 Untested = 8

So now I am very confused as to what these numbers are for. The timing limit is pretty self explanitory....but the others ? ? ?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 08:03 AM   #239
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,245

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Anyone make any headway on the 2k rev ? ? ?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2009, 02:24 PM   #240
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,396

Drives: 03 Evo 8, 08 RAV4/Sport/V6

I've had the same 2k rpm cold start for ever, using 9417 rom, if I immediatly release the clutch in neutral rpm goes down to 1400rpm. Thinking the clutch switch [triggers a flag that] has something to do with the 2k rpm spikeat startup.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
base, car, civic, cold, evo, fast, idle, poor, range, rav4, rpm, start, warms

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0