evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > EcuFlash
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 24, 2009, 07:32 PM   #1
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

sudden enrichment and stalling

looking through all the threads about stalling there are suggestions covering BOV, ISCV tables, MAF scaling, BISS, ROMs etc etc that all could contribute to stalling issues (very overwhelming). in my case when one does a quickish start from standstill and immediately depress the clutch, the idle will suddenly drop and afr goes rich. it does catch itself sometimes and may peg to 2K rpm after slowly coming down. Most times it just goes rich and stalls or hovers at 10 afr and comes back up. it seems to be happening more and more often. it's almost as if the MAF detects more air than really present and fuel is dumped. below is evoscan log, notice the odd 96 load area and increased airflow once the stumbling starts even though off throttle (14% is off throttle). any pointers would really help. i've done a boost leak test and switched back to stock plastic bov with no changes. the car is a 2.3 with revolvers and an intake.


Last edited by nitz; Jun 24, 2009 at 07:34 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 07:46 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,500

Drives: 2005 EVO VIII

Typical maf overrun at throttle close, which can be due to many things, such as intake pipe, turbo, cams, filter, etc, etc.

I'm sure some people can give you various pointers to make it better, but I would recommend converting to SD if you could. It will completely eliminate the problem, as the root cause is MAF based.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 08:12 PM   #3
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

thanks.. i don't have an iat or map sensor at this time. however i do have an autronic which i came off to get better startup, idle, drivability, and knock control. ironically i now have problems with phantom knock, idle, and startup..lol. well looks like i'll be tossing in a standalone until i've got those sensors and ready for oem ecu SD, cuz these problems are taking the fun out of driving my car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by l2r99gst View Post
Typical maf overrun at throttle close, which can be due to many things, such as intake pipe, turbo, cams, filter, etc, etc.

I'm sure some people can give you various pointers to make it better, but I would recommend converting to SD if you could. It will completely eliminate the problem, as the root cause is MAF based.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 08:19 PM   #4
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 148

Drives: AUDM_EVO IX, R33_GTST

Suggest you borrow or try one of the silicon hi-flow intake pipes, they work well and (usually) dont upset the MAF.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 08:43 PM   #5
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

well this intake ran perfectly on a stock motor/turbo setup.. so i think it's more a function of extra flow from the cams, stroker, and fpred turbo + the intake. either way do you have a link to what ur suggesting (it's for an evo VI with the battery relocated).
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin.oz View Post
Suggest you borrow or try one of the silicon hi-flow intake pipes, they work well and (usually) dont upset the MAF.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 09:26 PM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 148

Drives: AUDM_EVO IX, R33_GTST

ah, the 6 intake is quite different shape to the 9 I think, probably wont suite.
My intake came from MEEK in Sydney, its a SAMCO copy (supposedly).
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 09:37 PM   #7
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
casper980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 381

Drives: '03 Evo VIII, '91 240sx HB

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitz View Post
looking through all the threads about stalling there are suggestions covering BOV, ISCV tables, MAF scaling, BISS, ROMs etc etc that all could contribute to stalling issues (very overwhelming). in my case when one does a quickish start from standstill and immediately depress the clutch, the idle will suddenly drop and afr goes rich. it does catch itself sometimes and may peg to 2K rpm after slowly coming down. Most times it just goes rich and stalls or hovers at 10 afr and comes back up. it seems to be happening more and more often. it's almost as if the MAF detects more air than really present and fuel is dumped. below is evoscan log, notice the odd 96 load area and increased airflow once the stumbling starts even though off throttle (14% is off throttle). any pointers would really help. i've done a boost leak test and switched back to stock plastic bov with no changes. the car is a 2.3 with revolvers and an intake.

Upgrade the CPU Autronic in Nice...as long as you have someone reputable to tune it.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2009, 09:56 PM   #8
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

of course i do, myself
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper980 View Post
Upgrade the CPU Autronic in Nice...as long as you have someone reputable to tune it.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 06:25 AM   #9
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (29)
 
gfng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 864

Drives: evo VII evo VII

can this be the tps ????
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 06:43 AM   #10
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

how so? i adjusted it to within mitsu spec using a voltmeter. not sure what else can be done to eliminate possible tps issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gfng View Post
can this be the tps ????
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 06:50 AM   #11
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: montgomery, al
Posts: 253

Drives: volvo 740 turbo

Send a message via AIM to linuxman51
Screen still in the maf or no? I have a similar issue that wouldn't scale out and apparently won't tune out without causing an issue driving off... but mine didn't do it until I yanked the (mostly failing) screen out of the maf. I let off the gas and I can see the load spike 120 with the throttle closed, so I leaned that spot out at 1000rpms and 120 load, it made it better, but I still get stumbling reasonably frequently.

The problem becomes when you pull off from really low rpms it hits that spot on the map with it actually being in 'load' and goes really lean. I suspect I'm going to have to go to SD to fix it, but I'd really like to get mine tuned out 'normally' first.
__________________
03 TB EvoVIII, ams 35r, fmic, cams, etc. 440whp
90 Volvo 740 16v, t67, blah blah blah 512whp
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 07:46 AM   #12
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

i initially had the screen out but felt that was causing it. put the screen back in and the frequency of it happening decreased quite a bit. now without rhyme or reason it has gotten worse even with the screen in. i tried another maf with screen just to make sure i didn't have a failing maf but same result.

Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxman51 View Post
Screen still in the maf or no? I have a similar issue that wouldn't scale out and apparently won't tune out without causing an issue driving off... but mine didn't do it until I yanked the (mostly failing) screen out of the maf. I let off the gas and I can see the load spike 120 with the throttle closed, so I leaned that spot out at 1000rpms and 120 load, it made it better, but I still get stumbling reasonably frequently.

The problem becomes when you pull off from really low rpms it hits that spot on the map with it actually being in 'load' and goes really lean. I suspect I'm going to have to go to SD to fix it, but I'd really like to get mine tuned out 'normally' first.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 08:06 AM   #13
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 1,244

Drives: 2003 Mitsu EVO (white)

Looking at your airflow you can see that it hardly goes low enough to allow the LTFT low to adjust and stay consistant. You need to get the idle Hz to be lower.

Your base idle RPM is a bit low for Revolvers. Anything below 1K and it will have issues. Mine are set at 1070 and idle great.

your wide band is showing that it is running rather rich for idle.

your timing is a bit low for the revolvers as well.

SOOOO....

To get the MAF Hz down......on the bottom of the MAF there is a small rubber plug. Remove the rubber and turn out the ecrew until the hole it cloeses into is flush and wide open. This should lower the Hz enough to get the LTFT low to read.

Set your idle to about 1025 to 1070

In the fuel table in the 1000 rpm and below and 60 hz and below cells, set them to stock values

In the timing table same 1000 rpm and below and 60Hz and below cells raise the timing to about 8 degrees

Increase the idle stability timing control to 146 from the stock 128 value


These should help. Give them a shot and get back to us.

Paul
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 08:58 AM   #14
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (27)
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 881

Drives: '05 Tarmac Black SSL VIII

^ Freaking Idle/maf based problems guru right there....
__________________
FP Red*Greddy ProfecB Spec II*HKS TT*Nesei Short Route IC Piping*Synapse BOV*COMP 272s*Injen Intercooler*AFE Power Dry Filter*R/TErnie Intake*R/TErnie FULL 3" O2 housing with V-band*R/TErnie Modified DCsports 3" Down/Test/Flexpipe with V-Band*Greddy Ti-C Exhaust*255lph*Tein S-Techs*18" Volk LE-28s*Progress 25mm Rear Sway*Project Mu pads*JDM Tails*Cusco Heat Shield*Mishimoto Radiator hoses/Cap*ARC shift knob*Injector Dynamics 1000cc...
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2009, 09:49 AM   #15
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MIA
Posts: 367

Drives: 2005 EVO RS

the LTFT do adjust and eventually settle just didn't show there cuz i had recently disconnected the battery. However I agree that it is higher than should be (usually hovers at 43hz and sometimes 50hz), but doesn't seem to be outside the cutover for low mid LT as shown below. i see a bunch of silicone and not a rubber plug, so i'll just scrape it out and adjust the screw. for reference here are the Closed Loop - LT Trim Control Values
low->mid 75
mid->low 62.5
mid->high 1587.5
high->mid 1581.25


forgive my ignorance; i am a bit confused by the reference to Hz in the fuel and timing tables you made below. did you mean load instead?
for what it's worth my fuel and timing load axes are scaled as follows.. so if you mean't 60 load and below I would have to do 80 load and below for fuel.

fuel: 10 30 50 80 100....
time: 0 20 40 60 80 100...

i am also not sure what table you mean by idle stability timing control as I do not have a table by this name just the usual idle stepper look-up table which is rpm vs tps and has values below (i am on ROM 96260009):

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62
65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
67 68 68 68 68 68 68 69
70 70 70 70 70 70 71 72
72 72 73 73 73 73 74 76
74 75 75 75 75 76 77 79
76 77 77 77 77 78 79 82
78 79 79 79 79 81 85 89
81 81 81 82 83 86 92 104
83 83 84 85 86 90 99 140
85 86 87 88 90 95 115 160
87 88 90 91 93 102 140 160
89 90 92 94 97 111 160 160
92 93 95 97 101 133 160 160
94 95 98 103 111 146 160 160
96 98 101 110 120 160 160 160
98 100 108 120 120 160 160 160
100 105 115 133 140 160 160 160
104 110 120 160 160 160 160 160
136 130 160 160 160 160 160 160



Quote:
Originally Posted by Appauldd View Post
Looking at your airflow you can see that it hardly goes low enough to allow the LTFT low to adjust and stay consistant. You need to get the idle Hz to be lower.

Your base idle RPM is a bit low for Revolvers. Anything below 1K and it will have issues. Mine are set at 1070 and idle great.

your wide band is showing that it is running rather rich for idle.

your timing is a bit low for the revolvers as well.

SOOOO....

To get the MAF Hz down......on the bottom of the MAF there is a small rubber plug. Remove the rubber and turn out the ecrew until the hole it cloeses into is flush and wide open. This should lower the Hz enough to get the LTFT low to read.

Set your idle to about 1025 to 1070

In the fuel table in the 1000 rpm and below and 60 hz and below cells, set them to stock values

In the timing table same 1000 rpm and below and 60Hz and below cells raise the timing to about 8 degrees

Increase the idle stability timing control to 146 from the stock 128 value


These should help. Give them a shot and get back to us.

Paul

Last edited by nitz; Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
control, idle, stability, timing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0