evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > EcuFlash
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 17, 2009, 06:30 AM   #31
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfred View Post
Jamie, the weight adjustment does not seem to be having an effect of the whp and wtq numbers.
Only the driver weight makes a difference with the Mustang dyno sim's. The standard weight is used for Mustang simulation is 3400 lbs with a 175lb driver included. If the driver is lighter or heavier it changes but the base vehicle weight is modal. It has to do with the simulated pre-loading of the Eddy Current dyno's and the fact that almost all Mustang dyno shops stick with one vehicle weight for all Evo customers unless extreme weight reduction has been done. If you want to lower it, just lower the passenger weight below 175 lbs. Trust me, it works well enough lol.

I will edit the passenger weight box to allow negative values with the next revision but I really don't think its necessary since I compared a car that weighed 2700 lbs to factory weight cars and had LITTLE difference on the mustang dyno with pre-loading.
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Jun 17, 2009 at 08:10 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 08:50 AM   #32
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: (33)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 4,788

Drives: Evo IX MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades View Post
Only the driver weight makes a difference with the Mustang dyno sim's. The standard weight is used for Mustang simulation is 3400 lbs with a 175lb driver included. If the driver is lighter or heavier it changes but the base vehicle weight is modal. It has to do with the simulated pre-loading of the Eddy Current dyno's and the fact that almost all Mustang dyno shops stick with one vehicle weight for all Evo customers unless extreme weight reduction has been done. If you want to lower it, just lower the passenger weight below 175 lbs. Trust me, it works well enough lol.

I will edit the passenger weight box to allow negative values with the next revision but I really don't think its necessary since I compared a car that weighed 2700 lbs to factory weight cars and had LITTLE difference on the mustang dyno with pre-loading.
It doesn't work like that with road dyno data. The weight of the vehicle is required to calculate the correct power levels because it is the vehicle (and not the rollers) that is being accelerated. Doesn't matter if you are attempting to simulate MD numbers.
__________________
Works drop-in :: AMS LICP :: English Racing ported EM and HS :: Titek v2 O2 :: Helix v2 DP :: MIL.SPEC 100 cps cat :: RRE Stealth Stainless :: Walbro :: FIC 1050s :: E85 :: self-tuned :: 26.5 psi :: 340wtq/375whp VDR 5.71 EvoM mode, 77°F
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 09:05 AM   #33
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

Well, so far it seems to work pretty accurately between the MD dyno results and the street results of the same car on the same day that I logged, 3 cars from 3 MD dynos so far have had the same results on the street vs. the MD dyno. *shrug* Trust me, I dont know how it works but so far its the most consistent thing I could get to work thus far for the MD simulations. Once I see more hard data showing differently I will most certainly update the program to reflect it as much as possible.

Bryan @ GSTMotorsports is going to supply us some MD dyno vs. road dyno data soon so we can have more data to compare. The more data we compile, the more we can dial everything in. The more the merrier in this case!
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Jun 17, 2009 at 09:58 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:24 AM   #34
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (11)
 
crewdawg130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC via Puerto Rico
Posts: 357

Drives: 1955 VDub Turbo <best 9.97@132, 1956 VDub <0-60MPH eventually, 03 EVO OCHO

very helpfull
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:02 AM   #35
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: (33)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 4,788

Drives: Evo IX MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades View Post
Well, so far it seems to work pretty accurately between the MD dyno results and the street results of the same car on the same day that I logged, 3 cars from 3 MD dynos so far have had the same results on the street vs. the MD dyno. *shrug* Trust me, I dont know how it works but so far its the most consistent thing I could get to work thus far for the MD simulations. Once I see more hard data showing differently I will most certainly update the program to reflect it as much as possible.

Bryan @ GSTMotorsports is going to supply us some MD dyno vs. road dyno data soon so we can have more data to compare. The more data we compile, the more we can dial everything in. The more the merrier in this case!
I think its working ok because Evo 8/9s all are within about 100 lbs of each other (except for some prepared cars). Its still not right though. It would be more correct to multiply the road dyno acceleration whp component times the ratio of MD vehicle weight to actual weight. Then add in the drag whp.
__________________
Works drop-in :: AMS LICP :: English Racing ported EM and HS :: Titek v2 O2 :: Helix v2 DP :: MIL.SPEC 100 cps cat :: RRE Stealth Stainless :: Walbro :: FIC 1050s :: E85 :: self-tuned :: 26.5 psi :: 340wtq/375whp VDR 5.71 EvoM mode, 77°F
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 11:46 AM   #36
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 389

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Is there anyway of getting AEM logs to work on this? If so someone tell me how please id like to try it out!
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:21 PM   #37
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

attach a log on here and I'll take a look or email it to me at punkdivo78@hotmail.com
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:39 PM   #38
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfred View Post
I think its working ok because Evo 8/9s all are within about 100 lbs of each other (except for some prepared cars). Its still not right though. It would be more correct to multiply the road dyno acceleration whp component times the ratio of MD vehicle weight to actual weight. Then add in the drag whp.
Wanna throw up an example of how I should calculate that?

Bryan also said he would do multiple pulls with a wide range of vehicle weights inputted into the dyno software (as well as the vehicles ACTUAL weight)to see how much the numbers vary. He has said that he's seen little difference with large weight changes entered into the dyno but I'd still like to see the results for my own curiosity.
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 01:51 PM   #39
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 389

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Well i manually entered it in from my AEM logs and it worked I just wish there was a way to put the AEM log in a excel file so you didnt have to manually do it as it takes some time! lol. But non the less very nicely done Jack!!
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 01:55 PM   #40
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

Send me a log, I'll see if I can find a way to open it in excel so its easier for you.
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 02:01 PM   #41
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 389

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Im on it.. you will have it in a few moments
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 02:12 PM   #42
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 389

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Ok i sent it to your email u listed above.
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 02:48 PM   #43
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
Thoe99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,684

Drives: '03 Lancer Evolution 8

How does this compare to Data Log Lab's dyno readings?
__________________
CarDomain pics
Mods: GSC S1 cams, QTP 3" electric cutout downpipe, Hallman Pro MBC @22psi, Walbro 255 fuel pump, Vibrant cone air filter, Nisei LICP, custom self-tune, RobiSpec KW Club Sports, 18x9½+40 Enkei NTO3-M, 285/30/18 Yokohama Neova AD08
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 02:54 PM   #44
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (6)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 389

Drives: 03 EVO VIII some mods, 91 AWD Talon built motor sc61 turbo etc, 2006 GSXR1000 low long and modified

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thoe99 View Post
How does this compare to Data Log Lab's dyno readings?
When i compared it to my DLLs and had it turned on "Dyno jet" it was very close actually.
__________________
EVO VIII AMS 2.0, 850R, Jun 272s, VSR, AEM, E85 powered
700+AWHP DAILY DRIVEN
www.Automotosports.com
www.TeamRip.com
www.sparktechignitions.net
www.magnusmotorsports.com
Fathouse Fabrications
Blevins Tuning THE SNAKE TUNAR!
BFF Racing
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 02:58 PM   #45
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,998

Drives: '03 evo VIII BBY(sold!), '95 Talon ESI-Turbo'd, '90 Mirage 4g63

Ok, so no dice yet but all you need to transfer over is the RPM value closest to each 250 RPM increment anywhere between 2750-8000 RPM and the recorded time interval for that RPM. Much faster than copying the ENTIRE log over at least lol. I'll try to work on it. Try the AEM forums and ask if there is a way to output your data into an excel "friendly" file.
__________________
New VDR 5.71 Launched on 9/04/2009!! Now can be used for ANY vehicle, presets for all Evo 7,8,9,10 models!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 'Virtual Dyno Room v5.71' !

'90 Mirage hatchback 4g63 and Evo8 ECU powered!
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=300whp/268wtq (thru stock 1.5" exhaust!)

'03 BBY Evo 8 (sold)
VDR 5.71 (EvoM Mode)=339whp/335wtq
Best 1/4 Mile: 12.2@113mph

'95 Eagle Talon non-turbo ATX......turbo'd
Best 1/4 Mile: 13.99@101mph
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
build, dyno, engine, evo, free, graph, jack, online, room, simulation, small, trades, virtial, virtual, vurtual

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0