evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > EcuFlash
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 18, 2009, 10:25 AM   #256
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 332

Drives: 04 RS

I tried the recent procedures on setting boost with the BEC zeroed out and BDEL adjusted for load. I was getting lower boost too so I went back to 159.4 all the way down in BDEL (all of them). That's how it used to be and it got me 4-5 psi back. I adjusted duty cycle for 20 psi and now I'm working on the BEC table.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 10:30 AM   #257
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
Evo_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,111

Drives: 01 Audi S4 (DD) 04 WW VIII RS (project/fun/track) 06 TB IX GSR (sold) 05 AS VIII GSR (sold)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z_Lancer_Man View Post
Following this thread's pill replacement procedure, I am only hitting ~15 PSI peak. I installed a #58 pill in the line between the turbo and Tee and removed the pill at the solenoid since I'm implementing the new ECU direct boost control ECUFlash mods. I have zeroed out my BEC table just to see what the car did - would this be the cause of the low boost? If I start adding values into the BEC table, should I expect the car to actually hit my target boost or do I also need to add more aggressive MWGDC values? Here is what I currently have programmed:

First, If your running the stock solenoid, you need both pills, a modified one near the turbo and the stock one near the solenoid (even if you are gonna use the direct boost control mod). Also, if your only hitting 15lbs and cant go higher, check your connections, you may have a leak. If you need additional help, Pm me.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 10:31 AM   #258
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
Evo_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,111

Drives: 01 Audi S4 (DD) 04 WW VIII RS (project/fun/track) 06 TB IX GSR (sold) 05 AS VIII GSR (sold)

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbolarry View Post
I tried the recent procedures on setting boost with the BEC zeroed out and BDEL adjusted for load. I was getting lower boost too so I went back to 159.4 all the way down in BDEL (all of them). That's how it used to be and it got me 4-5 psi back. I adjusted duty cycle for 20 psi and now I'm working on the BEC table.
Having 159.4 all the way down in the BDEL tables is the WRONG way to run/tune ECU boost control.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 11:21 AM   #259
EvoM Guru
Personal Sales Rating: (33)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 4,790

Drives: Evo IX MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z_Lancer_Man View Post
...

What value do you have in the Boost Adder setting?
__________________
Works drop-in :: AMS LICP :: English Racing ported EM and HS :: Titek v2 O2 :: Helix v2 DP :: MIL.SPEC 100 cps cat :: RRE Stealth Stainless :: Walbro :: FIC 1050s :: E85 :: self-tuned :: 26.5 psi :: 340wtq/375whp VDR 5.71 EvoM mode, 77°F
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 11:39 AM   #260
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (111)
 
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,154

Drives: 06 WW EVO IX w/ SSL

Send a message via AIM to Z_Lancer_Man
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid View Post
First, If your running the stock solenoid, you need both pills, a modified one near the turbo and the stock one near the solenoid (even if you are gonna use the direct boost control mod). Also, if your only hitting 15lbs and cant go higher, check your connections, you may have a leak. If you need additional help, Pm me.
I thought, based on all the reading I've done, that the stock restrictor by the solenoid was to merely help stabilize the boost and reduce spikes - both things which could be corrected by fine tuning the ECU. Am I understanding this wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfred View Post
What value do you have in the Boost Adder setting?
I have 13.3 in there as I work at 2500 feet and live at 3000 feet.
__________________
AMS 3" TBE w/ TP |GFB BOV | AMS UICP | Muse LICP | Walbro 255 Fuel Pump | Mini Battery | Amsoil air filter w/ Vibrant MAF adapter | Custom Boost Pill (#58) | Omni Power 4-Bar MAP Sensor | Powerslot Slotted Cryo Rotors | Swift Springs | MIL.SPEC TB Shaft Seals
---
325/310 WHP/TQ (VDR 5.7) - 24 PSI, 91 Pump - Self Tuned w/ECUFlash
---
Previous Lancers
- '09 Lancer GTS (traded 6/19/09)
- '03 Lancer OZ Rally (traded 1/18/09)

Last edited by Z_Lancer_Man; Aug 18, 2009 at 11:41 AM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 11:46 AM   #261
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 1,885

Drives: EVO, STI

Boost adder won't matter if you have error correction zeroed out.

What happens if you add duty cycle? Does the boost go up? If not you put the pill in the wrong line. It should go in the line off the black compressor housing outlet pipe.
__________________
GST Motorsports
2439 Industrial Pkwy. West Suite A
Hayward, CA 94545
510-264-9049

The original E85 Army

http://www.gstmotorsports.com
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 11:51 AM   #262
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (111)
 
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,154

Drives: 06 WW EVO IX w/ SSL

Send a message via AIM to Z_Lancer_Man
Quote:
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports View Post
Boost adder won't matter if you have error correction zeroed out.

What happens if you add duty cycle? Does the boost go up? If not you put the pill in the wrong line. It should go in the line off the black compressor housing outlet pipe.
I'll try adding duty cycle - that was a thought of mine that perhaps I was just being too conservative. However, I am still surprised by how far off it is from my target boost levels. I know that without any pills, you will only get between 12 - 14 PSI, so I don't know if me only seeing peaks around 15 PSI is a coincidence or if there is more there. I'll post up a log I took yesterday. I do know for a fact that I placed the pill in the right line, between the compressor outlet and the tee.
__________________
AMS 3" TBE w/ TP |GFB BOV | AMS UICP | Muse LICP | Walbro 255 Fuel Pump | Mini Battery | Amsoil air filter w/ Vibrant MAF adapter | Custom Boost Pill (#58) | Omni Power 4-Bar MAP Sensor | Powerslot Slotted Cryo Rotors | Swift Springs | MIL.SPEC TB Shaft Seals
---
325/310 WHP/TQ (VDR 5.7) - 24 PSI, 91 Pump - Self Tuned w/ECUFlash
---
Previous Lancers
- '09 Lancer GTS (traded 6/19/09)
- '03 Lancer OZ Rally (traded 1/18/09)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 11:54 AM   #263
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 1,885

Drives: EVO, STI

If the pill is in the right line, and the right size, then it looks like you just have too little duty cycle.
__________________
GST Motorsports
2439 Industrial Pkwy. West Suite A
Hayward, CA 94545
510-264-9049

The original E85 Army

http://www.gstmotorsports.com
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 12:07 PM   #264
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (111)
 
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,154

Drives: 06 WW EVO IX w/ SSL

Send a message via AIM to Z_Lancer_Man
Pill is there and is the #58 drill size. Now granted, the bore is not perfectly aligned with the center axis of the rod stock, but it is the right size for my boost levels (< 25 PSI on 91 pump). I'll add 15% to my WGDC across the board and see what happens to my boost. Thanks for the help!
__________________
AMS 3" TBE w/ TP |GFB BOV | AMS UICP | Muse LICP | Walbro 255 Fuel Pump | Mini Battery | Amsoil air filter w/ Vibrant MAF adapter | Custom Boost Pill (#58) | Omni Power 4-Bar MAP Sensor | Powerslot Slotted Cryo Rotors | Swift Springs | MIL.SPEC TB Shaft Seals
---
325/310 WHP/TQ (VDR 5.7) - 24 PSI, 91 Pump - Self Tuned w/ECUFlash
---
Previous Lancers
- '09 Lancer GTS (traded 6/19/09)
- '03 Lancer OZ Rally (traded 1/18/09)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 12:14 PM   #265
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
Evo_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,111

Drives: 01 Audi S4 (DD) 04 WW VIII RS (project/fun/track) 06 TB IX GSR (sold) 05 AS VIII GSR (sold)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z_Lancer_Man View Post
I thought, based on all the reading I've done, that the stock restrictor by the solenoid was to merely help stabilize the boost and reduce spikes - both things which could be corrected by fine tuning the ECU. Am I understanding this wrong?
Your right and wrong. Your right about what the restrictor by the solenoid does, but you should have it, as it will help make tuning easier. Removing it leads to more eradicate behavior (like your said), which is harder to tune.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2009, 12:16 PM   #266
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (111)
 
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,154

Drives: 06 WW EVO IX w/ SSL

Send a message via AIM to Z_Lancer_Man
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid View Post
Your right and wrong. Your right about what the restrictor by the solenoid does, but you should have it, as it will help make tuning easier. Removing it leads to more eradicate behavior (like your said), which is harder to tune.
Hmm, your reasoning does make sense. I knew when I lost the stock restrictor in the engine bay it would come back to haunt me

However, it appears then that not having it in would just make tuning more difficult, but not drop my PSI by almost 10 from target. I'm still gonna try upping my WGDC.
__________________
AMS 3" TBE w/ TP |GFB BOV | AMS UICP | Muse LICP | Walbro 255 Fuel Pump | Mini Battery | Amsoil air filter w/ Vibrant MAF adapter | Custom Boost Pill (#58) | Omni Power 4-Bar MAP Sensor | Powerslot Slotted Cryo Rotors | Swift Springs | MIL.SPEC TB Shaft Seals
---
325/310 WHP/TQ (VDR 5.7) - 24 PSI, 91 Pump - Self Tuned w/ECUFlash
---
Previous Lancers
- '09 Lancer GTS (traded 6/19/09)
- '03 Lancer OZ Rally (traded 1/18/09)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2009, 09:04 AM   #267
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Clemerson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Campinas - Brazil
Posts: 8

Drives: Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX MR

hi,

changed the stock to WG forge, is coming to 30psi.

I use 26psi, the problem that comes and 26psi in the rotation above 4500 up to 7000 falls to fixed 21psi.

I have to configure EcuFlash to maintain 26 psi between 4500 to 7000 rmp?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2009, 11:18 AM   #268
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (25)
 
detroit pistins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Raleigh/Detroit/London Ont
Posts: 820

Drives: tb ix gsr ssl

I haven't had the chance to completely read thru this nice write up/thread, but if it is possible to tune the car at higher boost using the stock solenoid, then why are people switching to mbc's or aftermarket ebc's?
Thanks
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2009, 11:50 AM   #269
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (111)
 
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,154

Drives: 06 WW EVO IX w/ SSL

Send a message via AIM to Z_Lancer_Man
Quote:
Originally Posted by detroit pistins View Post
I haven't had the chance to completely read thru this nice write up/thread, but if it is possible to tune the car at higher boost using the stock solenoid, then why are people switching to mbc's or aftermarket ebc's?
Thanks
It's much simpler to just drop in a MBC, set it and forget it. Direct tuning with the ECU takes much more work and time, and of course requires changing ECU maps, which just scares some people - the potential to catastrophically destroy your engine will always turn away the weak of heart
__________________
AMS 3" TBE w/ TP |GFB BOV | AMS UICP | Muse LICP | Walbro 255 Fuel Pump | Mini Battery | Amsoil air filter w/ Vibrant MAF adapter | Custom Boost Pill (#58) | Omni Power 4-Bar MAP Sensor | Powerslot Slotted Cryo Rotors | Swift Springs | MIL.SPEC TB Shaft Seals
---
325/310 WHP/TQ (VDR 5.7) - 24 PSI, 91 Pump - Self Tuned w/ECUFlash
---
Previous Lancers
- '09 Lancer GTS (traded 6/19/09)
- '03 Lancer OZ Rally (traded 1/18/09)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
25, 300zx, apr, boost, controller, ecu, evo, factory, fit, flash, gtr2009, mods, solenoid, stock, wastegate

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0