evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > ECU +
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 3, 2007, 08:31 AM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
mad_VIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,539

Drives: Curzio's mom

Ideas on Ecu+ Knock Sensing / control

Tom,

I just wanted to open up a discussion about knock detection and correction now that you are working away on new features.

As you have previously mentioned, MUT-II knocksum is only reported at max 100 times persecond and the Ecu+ dsp unit logs voltage at every fire event. When tuning evo's it is all about keeping the ecu happy from a knock sum perspective. From working with several tuners it seems that in many cases the stock ecu detects knock well before an actual knock event may occure.

From what I understand, products like the Exede attenuate the factory knock sensor signal by some percentage, due to this, they are able to consistently produce more power than a re-flash because they are able to run a little more timing than you would with a reflash (and still keep the ecu happy.

One of the problems with voltage based kncok detection (as i see it) is that the level of background noise, and therefore output voltage, changes through the rev range. There are a few products (UTEC, and KnockLite, come to mind) that allow you to program the knock sensitivity by rpm range (http://www.turboxs.com/more_info.php?ID=212). This process involves running the engine through various rpm ranges and establishing a baseline voltage from each range then setting the detection curve rather than a fixed value.

Now, what I would like to propose for Ecu+ is the ability to attenuate the knock sensor output that goes to the ecu AND implement an rpm range based knock detection similar to the products mentioned above.

I think this would allow Ecu+ users to extract a little more power and still have a good safety net to fall back on.

Obviously, is the signal is over attenuated and the user did not setup the Ecu+ knock control strategy properly, there would be a serious risk of trashing your motor.

Thoughts????
__________________
Wicked White GSR SSS
93pump - 363 awhp @ DYNO4MANCE Dyno Dynamics with 1.0 C.F. (448 hp shootout)
Blouch Dominator 1 | Cosworth MX1's | HKS EVC VI | Ultimate Racing 02 Back | RC 750cc | DYNO4MANCE EcuTek Tune
Old Whip: 93pump 21psi - 340 awhp @ DYNO4MANCE Dyno Dynamics with 1.0 C.F. (~392 dynojet)
L.Y. VIII | DYNO4MANCE Tuned AEM EMS | HKS 272's | FPGreen | Cusco Twin | Shep Stg2 TC | KW V3's | TE-37's
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2007, 08:15 PM   #2
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (9)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Odenton, MD
Posts: 302

Drives: 2005 blue EVO VIII

About attenuating the knock signal - I'd need special hardware to do that, and the ECU+ doesn't contain anything that could be used for that right now. An alternative would be to make an external circuit to do it, and I'd probably need a bunch of interest for this to be worthwhile.

Doing an RPM-based knock voltage correction table is feasible. I think Jeff Jeske mentioned that in another thread. Post some thoughts as to how it might work from the user's perspective - that'd be a good start on getting it implemented in this or the next feature cycle.

Tom
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2007, 05:29 AM   #3
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (5)
 
mad_VIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,539

Drives: Curzio's mom

So the table would just be user defined voltage at various points. In order to find your starting point, you would start up Ecu+ and slowly run the car through the rev ranges to log the knockvoltage and establish the base lines.

Not sure if you would want to do rate or change based detection (spike detection) or absolute voltage or voltage delta from the range setpoint.

Code:
   0-1000     0.5v
1001-2000     0.6v
2001-3000     0.7v
3001-4000     1.2v
4001-5000     1.3v
5001-6000     1.6v
6001-7000     1.5v
7001-8000     1.4v
I think one setting for the reaction would be sufficient (like what you already have, pull x degrees and y fuel).

Thing is without knock signal attenuation, I'm not sure it would be worth the extra time and effort on your part since the stock Ecu is already good at pulling timing.

If we had this feature though it would allow some of use to work on figureing out the stock knock sensor filters while still having a margine of safety.
__________________
Wicked White GSR SSS
93pump - 363 awhp @ DYNO4MANCE Dyno Dynamics with 1.0 C.F. (448 hp shootout)
Blouch Dominator 1 | Cosworth MX1's | HKS EVC VI | Ultimate Racing 02 Back | RC 750cc | DYNO4MANCE EcuTek Tune
Old Whip: 93pump 21psi - 340 awhp @ DYNO4MANCE Dyno Dynamics with 1.0 C.F. (~392 dynojet)
L.Y. VIII | DYNO4MANCE Tuned AEM EMS | HKS 272's | FPGreen | Cusco Twin | Shep Stg2 TC | KW V3's | TE-37's
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0