Notices
ECU Flash

Open Loop Cruise - AFR leans over time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2014, 04:10 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Open Loop Cruise - AFR leans over time

Hey guys,

I recently switched over to open loop cruise and idle. Before switching I ensured my trims were within +/- 5%.

After tuning in my preferred AFR for idle and cruise, I am seeing something strange.... To me.

After extended driving, maybe 40+ minutes, the AFR will start to lean out between 0.5 and 0.8. Example cruise AFR was set and working at 15.6:1, however after driving for awhile it's starts to lean out to 16.4:1.

I figured the Walbro may be worn and so I bought and installed a new Walbro, unfortunately it did not resolve the problem.

Any ideas guys?

Last edited by tsitalon1; Apr 6, 2014 at 07:03 PM.
Old Apr 6, 2014, 05:18 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
charlie.tunah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Temp rising?
Old Apr 6, 2014, 05:52 PM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by charlie.tunah
Temp rising?

certainly seems like a compensation is having a effect. I cant recall all of the temperature compensations to IPW etc, but I would try to correlate it to the temperature of something changing. Whether it be fuel temp as IAT heatsoaking from return, or MAF (or post turbo for SD IAT).
Old Apr 6, 2014, 07:05 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Corrected the timeframe.. Usually requires 40+ minutes.

Temps stay consistent.

Do trims affect cruise afr (ipw) when in open loop?
Old Apr 6, 2014, 07:23 PM
  #5  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
I always thought they did. Which is part if the reason as close to zero as possible and letting them settle before tuning wot. But I had never seen that proactively reflected on here.

You can play with the hz crossover points andaybr achieve better results. Do you still have some closed loop happening ?
Old Apr 7, 2014, 04:11 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
I always thought they did. Which is part if the reason as close to zero as possible and letting them settle before tuning wot. But I had never seen that proactively reflected on here.

You can play with the hz crossover points andaybr achieve better results. Do you still have some closed loop happening ?
Nope, I'm in OL 100% of the time.

Maybe I'll re-enable closed loop and check trims for the third time

I vaguely remember a thread about trims affecting OL IPW, but that could have been for the Evo X I used to own and not the Evo IX I own now.
Old Apr 7, 2014, 10:57 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
r4p.t0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you used the periphery bit to switch to open loop?

Try to keep it on open loop by increasing the min temp required for closed loop to a value which wont be reached.

I can remember having some weird timing variations when switching to open loop via periphery bits, so I always used the min engine temp to stay in open loop.
With this method, AFR and timing were always dead-on, even on very long journeys with the engine running >7h non-stop...
(which gives you incredibly huge logfiles if you forget to stop/start logging for over half of the time )
Old Apr 8, 2014, 04:43 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I didn't use the periphery bit, I used the open loop rpm and load tables.

After switching back to closed loop I found my med trim at -10. I forgot I found a boost leak after my initial tuning.

I guess trims do affect open loop cruise!

Im back to dialing in the trims again and plan to report back to this thread.

Last edited by tsitalon1; Apr 8, 2014 at 04:54 AM.
Old Apr 8, 2014, 07:36 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
charlie.tunah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you guys are saying that even though you've disabled closed loop control that the ECU still records and stores LTFTs and changes open loop fueling? Seems odd...

Does this change if you disable the rear o2 with periphery? I dont think LTFTs change when you disable the rear 02 with periphery. Maybe it was another setting, but I remember having that issue before and wondering if a side benefit could could be to use that for this purpose.
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:09 AM
  #10  
Newbie
 
r4p.t0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC the ECU applies the last stored fuel trims to open loop but doesn't correct/change them any more. So you need to reset your trims to 0 (unplug the ecu or battery) before switching to full-time open loop. What happens if you change the "min temp for CL" value to stay in OL? does it still correct trims?
Old Apr 8, 2014, 12:56 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
charlie.tunah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding of the OP's explanation is that he is thinking that the -10 LTFT has an effect on open loop fueling. And pointing to that as a reason for his problem of AFRs leaning out during long cruise implies that the LTFTs are changing while he is driving.

Id be surprised if LTFT had any effect on open loop fueling and certainly shouldnt be changing when in open loop. But if they do...Id really like to know.
Old Apr 8, 2014, 02:34 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
That's my theory and I'm trying to prove it

Can anyone else confirm?
Old Apr 8, 2014, 03:40 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
Broke4speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an issue where my open loop cruise fueling starts out lean (where I set it 15.3:1), and richens up slightly (14.7-ish) by the end of my 30 min drive. My trims are completely zeroed, and the rear O2 is disabled in the peripheries, so that none of the trims are active. I like a closed loop idle, so I've altered the open loop tables accordingly. Over 1500rpm is all zeros so that I get STFTs still.

I had it tuned, trims zeroed, everything nice...then disabled the rear O2 in the peripheries...and had to retune?! It got richer, no idea why.
Old Apr 8, 2014, 03:58 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Broke4speed
I have an issue where my open loop cruise fueling starts out lean (where I set it 15.3:1), and richens up slightly (14.7-ish) by the end of my 30 min drive. My trims are completely zeroed, and the rear O2 is disabled in the peripheries, so that none of the trims are active. I like a closed loop idle, so I've altered the open loop tables accordingly. Over 1500rpm is all zeros so that I get STFTs still.

I had it tuned, trims zeroed, everything nice...then disabled the rear O2 in the peripheries...and had to retune?! It got richer, no idea why.
Exactly, something causes this!!

We're taking about 2006 cars here, so I'm sure someone has seen this before... Chime in and help
Old Apr 9, 2014, 05:30 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
tsitalon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm confused.

After switching back to closed loop and re-tuning for trims that are +/- 2%, I'm still seeing drifting O2's during open loop cruising.

During my daily commute today I saw 15.3 during the morning commute, and on my afternoon commute I saw it drift from 15.3 to 16.3 after 1 hour.

What can cause this?


Quick Reply: Open Loop Cruise - AFR leans over time



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 AM.