 |
|
Oct 6, 2008, 06:36 PM
|
#61
|
|
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 44)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,800
|
I can't believe I missed this entire thread.
It's been a great week with one more to go!
I am sure am having a great time.
Congrats on the accomplishments.
__________________
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
www.highboostforum.com
First 4g63 in the 12's, 11's, 10's, 9's, 8's and 7's.
WORLD'S FIRST EVO8 IN THE 8'S
WORLD'S FASTEST EVO8, 172.74 MPH.
WORLD's First EVO in the 9's on pump gas.
STOCK ECU's:
BR EVO X, pump gas, 11.71@124.01 mph
Project White, E85, 10.35@138.53 mph
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 10:50 PM
|
#63
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,418
Drives: 06 Evo IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
|
You are mistaken. The Fastest=highest trap speeds in which case 9sec9 and OKIX have beaten the previous record of 142mph. ANIBAL BBQ holds the "QUICKEST" stock appearing turbo record of 9.59 still but NOT the "FASTEST".
__________________
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
Stock Turbo/Stock Cams 11.388@119.92 Best MPH 120.38
10.805@125.97mph 1.574 60ft Stock turbo
Quickest Stock Turbo/Stock Block/Stock ECU
Worlds Quickest Stock Block Evo IX
FP Red/Stock Block 10.301@132 1.56 60ft
Stock Turbo 442WHP 482WTQ tuned by TTP
FP Red 590WHP 576WTQ tuned by TTP
Sponsored by
TTP Engineering
Judge Racing
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 11:00 PM
|
#64
|
Personal Sales Rating: ( 136)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,443
Drives: 2005 Evo RS.. 1st Street Evo in the 8's!!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
|
Last I checked 142 was not faster than 145.. So the title is correct.. Ohio does it again!!
Mike
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 11:09 PM
|
#65
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 65)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Back in SoCal!
Posts: 692
Drives: TURBO cars only !!!!!
|
Looks like I may have to ditch the Green for a Red after I have the Wilson V2 installed. Awesome!
Red River shoot-out, would like to go to that game some day!
__________________
Oz
2003 Tarmac Black Evo 8 (A.K.A Mr. Clean)
My Evo
Powered by Buschur Racing!
Reese Tuning- FP BLACK on the way!
ROBISPEC ///
"The boost-induced adrenaline rush that is an aggressively tuned TURBO
car pulling at the reigns in anger is profoundly tempting. Evan Griffey TM"
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 11:10 PM
|
#66
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 50)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Buren, OH
Posts: 1,336
Drives: 600 hp Buschur Evo 8, 99 Dodge Ram 5.9 (tow vehicle)
|
Welcome to Ohio, home of the fastest evos!
__________________
Buschur Built Monster! One of the Buschur freaks!
New Set-up: BR 2.1 on E-85
Street Tune: 640 hp / 485 tq
Race Tune: 708 hp / 552.6 tq: 9.44 @ 159.57
Winners COME here and STAY here:
WWW.BUSCHURRACING.COM
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 11:33 PM
|
#67
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,418
Drives: 06 Evo IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
Last I checked 142 was not faster than 145.. So the title is correct.. Ohio does it again!!
Mike
|
Didn't I just say that? 
Btw Mike you have a pm
__________________
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
Stock Turbo/Stock Cams 11.388@119.92 Best MPH 120.38
10.805@125.97mph 1.574 60ft Stock turbo
Quickest Stock Turbo/Stock Block/Stock ECU
Worlds Quickest Stock Block Evo IX
FP Red/Stock Block 10.301@132 1.56 60ft
Stock Turbo 442WHP 482WTQ tuned by TTP
FP Red 590WHP 576WTQ tuned by TTP
Sponsored by
TTP Engineering
Judge Racing
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2008, 11:42 PM
|
#68
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 63)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,327
Drives: Evo 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by inneedof
of course he was joking, they aren't shorter they are just down hill
|
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 09:47 AM
|
#69
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PUERTO RICO
Posts: 98
Drives: EVO 8
|
just to clear everything.. i am not part of any crew.. i am all alone!! so lets see when you get betters 60ft how the miles drops.. also wich is going to get first on the finish line? 9:59 or 9:77 hmmmmm lets do math??? for what? numbers speak for themselves!! sorry dudes..
GAME OVER!!
CONTINUE: YES NO ? jajaja
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 09:52 AM
|
#70
|
|
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 87)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norwalk,OH
Posts: 4,241
Drives: off the road at random and hits stuff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
just to clear everything.. i am not part of any crew.. i am all alone!! so lets see when you get betters 60ft how the miles drops.. also wich is going to get first on the finish line? 9:59 or 9:77 hmmmmm lets do math??? for what? numbers speak for themselves!! sorry dudes..
GAME OVER!!
CONTINUE: YES NO ? jajaja
|
One more time....
QUICKEST is the amount of time it takes to get from point A to point B. NOT speed.
FASTEST is the speed it takes you to get from point A to point B. NOT time.
Hard to figure out? For some... evidently it is.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 09:52 AM
|
#71
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Barbertucky, OH
Posts: 771
Drives: 2006 IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
just to clear everything.. i am not part of any crew.. i am all alone!! so lets see when you get betters 60ft how the miles drops.. also wich is going to get first on the finish line? 9:59 or 9:77 hmmmmm lets do math??? for what? numbers speak for themselves!! sorry dudes..
GAME OVER!!
CONTINUE: YES NO ? jajaja
|
WTF is jajaja? Before you do the math lets do English........
9:59am.......9:77pm :shrug:
__________________
2006 Evolution IX - 10.14 @ 136.75 mph -
(FP-Black / BR2.0 / AEM EMS / E85)
550 whp / 529 ft/lbs
Buschur Racing / Bushwacker Transmissions / Forced Performance
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 09:53 AM
|
#72
|
|
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 87)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norwalk,OH
Posts: 4,241
Drives: off the road at random and hits stuff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StreetThisEvo
9:59am....... 9:77pm :shrug: |
Wouldnt that be 10:17 pm?
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 10:01 AM
|
#73
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Barbertucky, OH
Posts: 771
Drives: 2006 IX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrod@Buschur
Wouldnt that be 10:17 pm?
|
 Dam me no not 2 smart
__________________
2006 Evolution IX - 10.14 @ 136.75 mph -
(FP-Black / BR2.0 / AEM EMS / E85)
550 whp / 529 ft/lbs
Buschur Racing / Bushwacker Transmissions / Forced Performance
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 10:01 AM
|
#74
|
|
Gold Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 87)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norwalk,OH
Posts: 4,241
Drives: off the road at random and hits stuff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StreetThisEvo
Dam me no not 2 smart |
Ah... i'll let it slide.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2008, 10:10 AM
|
#75
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 461
Drives: EVO IX RS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shangai
just to clear everything.. i am not part of any crew.. i am all alone!! so lets see when you get betters 60ft how the miles drops.. also wich is going to get first on the finish line? 9:59 or 9:77 hmmmmm lets do math??? for what? numbers speak for themselves!! sorry dudes..
GAME OVER!!
CONTINUE: YES NO ? jajaja
|
This is the title of the thread, read it twice if you have too."The fastest stock appearing turbo record has been broken"
Now like I said, go have someone help you understand the difference between being quicker and faster. I certainly acknowledge the Annibal guys being quicker than I at this point and I also understand what it takes to achieve that time. Many congrats should go out to them. That is something that you probably can not understand either. This is not a knock on you. Some people are just ignorant to certain things. Its ok, you will get it. 
Last edited by OKIX; Oct 7, 2008 at 10:53 AM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| | 
|
