|
View Poll Results: POLL: Front and Rear Spring Rate Ratio
|
|
Lighter in front than rear
|
  
|
44 |
58.67% |
|
Same front and back
|
  
|
5 |
6.67% |
|
Stronger in front than rear
|
  
|
26 |
34.67% |
 |
|
Jul 31, 2007, 09:42 AM
|
#31
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 16)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,641
Drives: '04 EVO VIII, '06 EVO IX RS, '90 1JZ-TT Supra
|
I would try going up another 100# in the rear. You should notice a difference with that. One thing to keep in mind is -- will your shocks have enough damening to control the extra spring rate. You may want to call Stance to get their input on that.
From what I've found, going stiffer in the rear will help some with the inside front wheel spin, but you really need an LSD for best performance.
I think, depending on how you are set up now you could also try spacing out the front wheels 10mm or so, or raising the rear ride height a little bit.
Anyone else have any input??
EVOlutionary
__________________
Many thanks to:
Andy @ Showcase Mitsubishi
Keith @ Pure Tuning
David @ DHP Composites
Jon @ TRE
Wayne @ Paradigm Performance
Evan @Exedy Clutch
for your contributions to the EVOlutionary EVO9 Project:
2008 - one car - 20+ wins
2008 - Solo2 XPL National Champ
2008 - Solo2 SM National Champ
2009 - the sky's the limit!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Aug 1, 2007, 01:34 PM
|
#32
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 752
Drives: 03 EVO
|
I now have 8k front 10k rear and am pretty happy with the handling. I used the vishnu/chronohunter formula. I could have higher overall rates but did not want to sacrifice the daily drivability.
I also put in a mitsu helical diff. BIG difference there!
I have a stock rear sway bar and 13mm spacers in front. I would have gone with less but I had huge issues with my Helix (borchuan/meagan/BC etc) coilovers and the 275s rubbing.
I have been winning BSP with this new setup vs last year being somewhere in the middle. Hopefully my driving is improving too...
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 9, 2009, 10:35 AM
|
#33
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103
|
What would you guys recommend for a track car? I want to run 275 or 285 R888/NT01s. I'm at 8/9 now and am thinking of going to:
9/10
9/11
10/11
10/12
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 10, 2009, 01:36 PM
|
#34
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 17)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 752
Drives: 03 EVO
|
I would go as high as you can live with. The big thing is how much you want the car to be loose (oversteer) The higher spring rate you go in the rear relative to the front will give you more rotation.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 11, 2009, 01:17 PM
|
#35
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chmodlf
I would go as high as you can live with. The big thing is how much you want the car to be loose (oversteer) The higher spring rate you go in the rear relative to the front will give you more rotation.
|
I understand that and I'm also trying to reduce body roll. I also don't want a fast breakaway if possible. To get the rear loose I'd rather go with a diff, like Carbonetic (I know, expensive). The higher rates are fine for me, but the girls I date always complain about the suspension. As they like to tell me, "It's not just about what you want." 
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 11, 2009, 07:13 PM
|
#36
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lexington, MA
Posts: 215
Drives: Evolution 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockEvoIX
I understand that and I'm also trying to reduce body roll. I also don't want a fast breakaway if possible. To get the rear loose I'd rather go with a diff, like Carbonetic (I know, expensive). The higher rates are fine for me, but the girls I date always complain about the suspension. As they like to tell me, "It's not just about what you want."  
|
Upgrading your rear diff to a more limited slip will transfer more power to the rear and help you get your rear loose on corner exit. For that, I recommend TRE's rebuild of the OEM rear diff. It turned my car from understeering on corner exit to oversteering ferociously. I spent the next six months fixing the oversteer, which was a good thing in the long run, believe me!
As for fast breakaway, there is no free lunch. The stiffer your springs, the less body roll you have, but the faster it breaks away. (Watch an F1 car spin for example.) It's all about the resonant frequency of your suspension.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 13, 2009, 03:30 PM
|
#37
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 0)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 136
Drives: Lowered IX, Raised Tacoma, wrecked CBR 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockEvoIX
What would you guys recommend for a track car? I want to run 275 or 285 R888/NT01s. I'm at 8/9 now and am thinking of going to:
9/10
9/11
10/11
10/12
|
I've got 10/12k springs on my car now, front and rear. (I think that's what your numbers are referring to). I use the car for street driving and autocross. They have worked well for both. That being said, I do adjust damping dramatically for auto cross events.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 13, 2009, 10:57 PM
|
#38
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103
|
Thanks guys! I haven't been able to get into contact with TRE but haven't tried in a couple of months and gave up. I think I'm going with 10kg/11kg as I will get a rollbar at some point which will stiffen the car up.
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
|
Tags
|
cr, effect, evo, front, higher, husqvarna, increasing, motion, rate, ratio, rear, s2000, set, spring, versus  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|