evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Advanced > Brakes and Suspension
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


View Poll Results: POLL: Front and Rear Spring Rate Ratio
Lighter in front than rear 44 58.67%
Same front and back 5 6.67%
Stronger in front than rear 26 34.67%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 31, 2007, 09:42 AM   #31
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (16)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
EVOlutionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,641

Drives: '04 EVO VIII, '06 EVO IX RS, '90 1JZ-TT Supra

I would try going up another 100# in the rear. You should notice a difference with that. One thing to keep in mind is -- will your shocks have enough damening to control the extra spring rate. You may want to call Stance to get their input on that.

From what I've found, going stiffer in the rear will help some with the inside front wheel spin, but you really need an LSD for best performance.

I think, depending on how you are set up now you could also try spacing out the front wheels 10mm or so, or raising the rear ride height a little bit.

Anyone else have any input??

EVOlutionary
__________________
Many thanks to:

Andy @ Showcase Mitsubishi
Keith @ Pure Tuning
David @ DHP Composites
Jon @ TRE
Wayne @ Paradigm Performance
Evan @Exedy Clutch

for your contributions to the EVOlutionary EVO9 Project:

2008 - one car - 20+ wins
2008 - Solo2 XPL National Champ
2008 - Solo2 SM National Champ
2009 - the sky's the limit!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2007, 01:34 PM   #32
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 752

Drives: 03 EVO

I now have 8k front 10k rear and am pretty happy with the handling. I used the vishnu/chronohunter formula. I could have higher overall rates but did not want to sacrifice the daily drivability.

I also put in a mitsu helical diff. BIG difference there!

I have a stock rear sway bar and 13mm spacers in front. I would have gone with less but I had huge issues with my Helix (borchuan/meagan/BC etc) coilovers and the 275s rubbing.

I have been winning BSP with this new setup vs last year being somewhere in the middle. Hopefully my driving is improving too...
__________________
2003 GSR -- Not the same as shipped
For Sale:
Swift Coilover Springs 16K
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 10:35 AM   #33
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103

What would you guys recommend for a track car? I want to run 275 or 285 R888/NT01s. I'm at 8/9 now and am thinking of going to:

9/10
9/11
10/11
10/12
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2009, 01:36 PM   #34
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (17)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 752

Drives: 03 EVO

I would go as high as you can live with. The big thing is how much you want the car to be loose (oversteer) The higher spring rate you go in the rear relative to the front will give you more rotation.
__________________
2003 GSR -- Not the same as shipped
For Sale:
Swift Coilover Springs 16K
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2009, 01:17 PM   #35
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103

Quote:
Originally Posted by chmodlf View Post
I would go as high as you can live with. The big thing is how much you want the car to be loose (oversteer) The higher spring rate you go in the rear relative to the front will give you more rotation.
I understand that and I'm also trying to reduce body roll. I also don't want a fast breakaway if possible. To get the rear loose I'd rather go with a diff, like Carbonetic (I know, expensive). The higher rates are fine for me, but the girls I date always complain about the suspension. As they like to tell me, "It's not just about what you want."
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2009, 07:13 PM   #36
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lexington, MA
Posts: 215

Drives: Evolution 8

Send a message via AIM to point&shoot
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockEvoIX View Post
I understand that and I'm also trying to reduce body roll. I also don't want a fast breakaway if possible. To get the rear loose I'd rather go with a diff, like Carbonetic (I know, expensive). The higher rates are fine for me, but the girls I date always complain about the suspension. As they like to tell me, "It's not just about what you want."
Upgrading your rear diff to a more limited slip will transfer more power to the rear and help you get your rear loose on corner exit. For that, I recommend TRE's rebuild of the OEM rear diff. It turned my car from understeering on corner exit to oversteering ferociously. I spent the next six months fixing the oversteer, which was a good thing in the long run, believe me!

As for fast breakaway, there is no free lunch. The stiffer your springs, the less body roll you have, but the faster it breaks away. (Watch an F1 car spin for example.) It's all about the resonant frequency of your suspension.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2009, 03:30 PM   #37
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 136

Drives: Lowered IX, Raised Tacoma, wrecked CBR 600

Quote:
Originally Posted by stockEvoIX View Post
What would you guys recommend for a track car? I want to run 275 or 285 R888/NT01s. I'm at 8/9 now and am thinking of going to:

9/10
9/11
10/11
10/12
I've got 10/12k springs on my car now, front and rear. (I think that's what your numbers are referring to). I use the car for street driving and autocross. They have worked well for both. That being said, I do adjust damping dramatically for auto cross events.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2009, 10:57 PM   #38
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103

Thanks guys! I haven't been able to get into contact with TRE but haven't tried in a couple of months and gave up. I think I'm going with 10kg/11kg as I will get a rollbar at some point which will stiffen the car up.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cr, effect, evo, front, higher, husqvarna, increasing, motion, rate, ratio, rear, s2000, set, spring, versus

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0