 |
|
Oct 7, 2009, 11:54 PM
|
#1
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 308
Drives: 06 Evo MR
|
248.3 Miles to one tank of E-85
Once again I have to say that Tobz is the Man! With FIC 1350's and the FP Red, I am getting better mileage then I was with the stock turbo and PTE 880's!!!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 12:12 AM
|
#2
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 9)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lake In The HIlls
Posts: 1,339
Drives: 05 Electric Blue Evo VIII, 1997 "Torque Monster" Talon
|
Really? I get 195 miles to the tank on 93. I am not tuned but have mods. My afr gets down to 9.6.
__________________
- Ebay Catback with Turbo XS downpipe
- Hallman manual boost controller
- Walbro 255 fuel pump
- Perrin Intake
- Turbo XS front mount
- Defi blue racer boost gauge
|
|
Online
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 12:20 AM
|
#3
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 32)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Morton Grove (Chicago)
Posts: 976
Drives: 06 Blue EVO IX
|
Define a tank of gas?
Example: Usually the light comes on close to 12 gallons of gas being filled. So in this case if you travelled 248.3 miles and filled exactly 12 gallons then you got 20.69 mpg. Other people might be filling up a little earlier maybe they have 10 gallons to fill to full and some might be going for record breaking fumes left etc...
So when you say a tank, how many gallons are you filling up with that reaches full tank?
I am currently getting 19-21 mpg depending on city or highway mixtures. I calculate miles driven / gallons filled to full. I dont necessarily go down to empty and you dont have to either. As long as you are consisten in filling up to full each time so you start close to same amount of gas each to calculate from where you left off.
But if your only filling 10 gallons then your getting 24 mpg on E85 and thats very impressive. But if its 20 mpg thats very good as well for e85.
__________________
2006 Blue EVO IX
3" Down Pipe & Testpipe w/ Stock Catback
TTP Swain o2 housing & Vibrant Cone filter
Forge WGA & Hallman RX Pro (cabin)
CCI Stage 3 clutch
Blox Motor Mount
ShepTrans
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 09:32 AM
|
#4
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 308
Drives: 06 Evo MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluEVOIX
Define a tank of gas?
So when you say a tank, how many gallons are you filling up with that reaches full tank?
I am currently getting 19-21 mpg depending on city or highway mixtures. I calculate miles driven / gallons filled to full. I dont necessarily go down to empty and you dont have to either. As long as you are consisten in filling up to full each time so you start close to same amount of gas each to calculate from where you left off.
But if your only filling 10 gallons then your getting 24 mpg on E85 and thats very impressive. But if its 20 mpg thats very good as well for e85.
|
The light was on for about 10 miles, I put in 13.157 Gallons of E-85 when I filled up. That means, I averaged 18.872 MPG!!! Not to bad if you ask me!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:07 AM
|
#5
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 22)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 644
Drives: a Black 3wd Beast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuslimEvoFreak
Really? I get 195 miles to the tank on 93. I am not tuned but have mods. My afr gets down to 9.6. 
|
Maybe you should get tuned?
Anyway, I've averaged 21-23 mpg on the highway on E85 travelling on multiple occasions. This is driving an average of 70mph +/- and getting into boost 1-3 times. Gotta love it! Only a $1.75 a gallon here and it's been that price for over a month now.
__________________
ROBISPEC///
Buschur Racing
E85
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:11 AM
|
#6
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,438
Drives: TB EVO IX MR, 2001 Integra Type-R, Porsche 1974 914 1.8 liter
|
Running with mods untuned is pretty non-sensical
__________________
331 WHP & 300 WTQ FPgreen w/ stock cams with a 100 Cell HFC on a Mustang Dyno on 91 octane
CBRD BBK installed and waiting for some Bryan@GST magic :P
t00ned by Bryan@GST Motorsports
Proud supporter of SPEEDELEMENT
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:41 AM
|
#7
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 1,885
Drives: EVO, STI
|
18.8 is pretty good. So far my best on my personal Evo that runs E85 24/7 is 20.5 mpg with mixed hwy/street. I still haven't done 100% hwy with E85.
- Bryan
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:45 AM
|
#8
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 9)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,564
Drives: RX7 GSL-SE turbo, 05 MR Graphite Gray,02 GSXR-750, 88 supra turbo
|
I got 282 miles on one tank, all highway and factory closed loop with scaling that was half decent on 880's.. I just switched back to gasoline and went 358 miles with scaling that leaves a bit to be desired.. Driving smart does wonders for mileage...
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 AM
|
#9
|
|
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 9)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,564
Drives: RX7 GSL-SE turbo, 05 MR Graphite Gray,02 GSXR-750, 88 supra turbo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
18.8 is pretty good. So far my best on my personal Evo that runs E85 24/7 is 20.5 mpg with mixed hwy/street. I still haven't done 100% hwy with E85.
- Bryan
|
I noticed "the original" in your sig, I was wondering what was goin on when I saw those stickers I was like WTF haha, good times
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 11:54 AM
|
#10
|
Personal Sales Rating: ( 168)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 2,432
|
Got 21mpg around town on one tank of e85. Im on 1450cc Bluemaxs with stock turbo too. But that from being kind of easy on the throttle. Who wants to be easy on the throttle with e85 though! Not me.
Last edited by maperformance; Oct 8, 2009 at 02:07 PM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 02:26 PM
|
#11
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 325
Drives: '06 MR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I still haven't done 100% hwy with E85.
- Bryan
|
Understandably. Who wants to cruise around in vacuum when all that boost is available. I avoid highways as much as possible just so I have excuses to accelerate quickly.
On topic: I am seeing a more common 15-16mpg on E-85. Of course, a lot of that has been with lots of datalog runs as I try things out and see what kind of changes occur.
__________________
-Jon
'06 Lancer Evolution IX MR
'97 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 02:37 PM
|
#12
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 6)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 229
Drives: 03 Lancer Evo 8
|
I can't wait until there is one close to me so I can convert, this is the magic fuel.
__________________
----------____
------t_ /---l---Y ----p {
------L (@)_]__(@)_j [ ] <---- guard rail
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 02:44 PM
|
#13
|
|
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: ( 2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteyTurbo
I got 282 miles on one tank, all highway and factory closed loop with scaling that was half decent on 880's.. I just switched back to gasoline and went 358 miles with scaling that leaves a bit to be desired.. Driving smart does wonders for mileage...
|
I can drive my Insight (2000 Manual) to 65mpg in city for over 600 miles on a tank yet I can't for the life of me get over about 260-270 for 93 Octane on all highway miles or much much worse for E85... Wonder if the car makes a difference?
Dan
__________________
Professional Awesome Time Attack
2001 Mitsubishi Evolution VII
2nd Overall 2009 Redline Street AWD East Coast
www.ProfessionalAwesome.com
MA Performance
T1 Race Development
JRZ Suspension
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 02:57 PM
|
#14
|
|
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: ( 1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 62
Drives: 2006 Evolution MR SE
|
I wish they had a pump nearby too. I would think that if you ran a car the same way back to back from E-85 and gas the gas would give you better gas mileage based off this excerpt:
Quote:
|
Using E85 in a gasoline engine has the drawback of achieving lower fuel economy as more fuel is needed per unit air (stoichiometric fuel ratio) to run the engine in comparison with gasoline.
|
Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E85. Not saying I am in the know, just stating what I read and how it doesn't appear to make sense to what was stated in this thread. Can anyone clarify this?
|
|
Offline
|
|
Oct 8, 2009, 03:34 PM
|
#15
|
|
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: ( 40)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution My Garage
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,812
Drives: '04 evo8 daily driver, '03 evo8 time attack car, 08 outlander
|
358 miles on a tank? must be hypermileing it or something. i rarely get on it, with the slow spooling 35r, running in closed loop nearly all the time, mix highway/city and get 280 tops (typically 250-270). 330 on one tank was my best. coming out of the mountains in colorado, with the wind behind me, all highway.
E85 if you are driving the same distance/driving style, and don't change the closed loop target you WILL use 20-30% more fuel. 18 for e85 is on par with 24mpg on 93.
|
|
Offline
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|